Literature DB >> 22286536

Modeling the anti-masking effects of the olivocochlear reflex in auditory nerve responses to tones in sustained noise.

Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli1, Skyler G Jennings, Michael G Heinz, Elizabeth A Strickland.   

Abstract

The medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) has been hypothesized to provide benefit for listening in noise. Strong physiological support for an anti-masking role for the MOCR has come from the observation that auditory nerve (AN) fibers exhibit reduced firing to sustained noise and increased sensitivity to tones when the MOCR is elicited. The present study extended a well-established computational model for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired AN responses to demonstrate that these anti-masking effects can be accounted for by reducing outer hair cell (OHC) gain, which is a primary effect of the MOCR. Tone responses in noise were examined systematically as a function of tone level, noise level, and OHC gain. Signal detection theory was used to predict detection and discrimination for different spontaneous rate fiber groups. Decreasing OHC gain decreased the sustained noise response and increased maximum discharge rate to the tone, thus modeling the ability of the MOCR to decompress AN fiber rate-level functions. Comparing the present modeling results with previous data from AN fibers in decerebrate cats suggests that the ipsilateral masking noise used in the physiological study may have elicited up to 20 dB of OHC gain reduction in addition to that inferred from the contralateral noise effects. Reducing OHC gain in the model also extended the dynamic range for discrimination over a wide range of background noise levels. For each masker level, an optimal OHC gain reduction was predicted (i.e., where maximum discrimination was achieved without increased detection threshold). These optimal gain reductions increased with masker level and were physiologically realistic. Thus, reducing OHC gain can improve tone-in-noise discrimination even though it may produce a “hearing loss” in quiet. Combining MOCR effects with the sensorineural hearing loss effects already captured by this computational AN model will be beneficial for exploring the implications of their interaction for the difficulties hearing-impaired listeners have in noisy situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22286536      PMCID: PMC3298613          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-011-0310-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  40 in total

1.  Quantifying the implications of nonlinear cochlear tuning for auditory-filter estimates.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of anesthesia on efferent-mediated adaptation of the DPOAE.

Authors:  K P Boyev; M C Liberman; M C Brown
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-02-27

3.  An auditory-periphery model of the effects of acoustic trauma on auditory nerve responses.

Authors:  Ian C Bruce; Murray B Sachs; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers. II. Nonlinear tuning with a frequency glide.

Authors:  Qing Tan; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Response to noise of auditory nerve fibers in the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  M A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Antimasking effect of crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation with loud clicks in guinea pig.

Authors:  P Nieder; I Nieder
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Nonlinearities in auditory-nerve fiber responses to bandlimited noise.

Authors:  T B Schalk; M B Sachs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Evaluating adaptation and olivocochlear efferent feedback as potential explanations of psychophysical overshoot.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Michael G Heinz; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-26

10.  Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a noninvasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength.

Authors:  S F Maison; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  20 in total

1.  Effect of human auditory efferent feedback on cochlear gain and compression.

Authors:  Ifat Yasin; Vit Drga; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The effects of ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral broadband noise on the mid-level hump in intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The use of confusion patterns to evaluate the neural basis for concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Modeling the time-varying and level-dependent effects of the medial olivocochlear reflex in auditory nerve responses.

Authors:  Christopher J Smalt; Michael G Heinz; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-12-05

5.  Computational modeling of individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-30

6.  Notched-noise precursors improve detection of low-frequency amplitude modulation.

Authors:  Ali Almishaal; Gavin M Bidelman; Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Evaluating the effects of olivocochlear feedback on psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Level-dependent changes in perception of speech envelope cues.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Xin Wang; Amy R Horwitz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-08

9.  Computational model predictions of cues for concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-07-08

10.  Accounting for nonmonotonic precursor duration effects with gain reduction in the temporal window model.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.