Literature DB >> 10844039

Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a noninvasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength.

S F Maison1, M C Liberman.   

Abstract

Permanent noise-induced damage to the inner ear is a major cause of hearing impairment, arising from exposures occurring during both work- and pleasure-related activities. Vulnerability to noise-induced hearing loss is highly variable: some have tough, whereas others have tender ears. This report documents, in an animal model, the efficacy of a simple nontraumatic assay of normal ear function in predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury. The assay measures the strength of a sound-evoked neuronal feedback pathway to the inner ear, the olivocochlear efferents, by examining otoacoustic emissions created by the normal ear, which can be measured with a microphone in the external ear. Reflex strength was inversely correlated with the degree of hearing loss after subsequent noise exposure. These data suggest that one function of the olivocochlear efferent system is to protect the ear from acoustic injury. This assay, or a simple modification of it, could be applied to human populations to screen for individuals most at risk in noisy environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10844039      PMCID: PMC6772446     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  33 in total

1.  Effects of chronic cochlear de-efferentation on auditory-nerve response.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Unique postsynaptic signaling at the hair cell efferent synapse permits calcium to evoke changes on two time scales.

Authors:  T S Sridhar; M C Brown; W F Sewell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.

Authors:  E Veuillet; L Collet; R Duclaux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Stimulation of efferent olivocochlear bundle causes release from low level masking.

Authors:  P Nieder; I Nieder
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-07-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Effects of electric stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on single auditory-nerve fibers in the cat.

Authors:  M L Wiederhold; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Variations in the effects of electric stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on cat single auditory-nerve-fiber responses to tone bursts.

Authors:  M L Wiederhold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Neurotransmitters and neuromodulators of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  M Eybalin
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  Cochlear mechanics: implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations.

Authors:  D O Kim
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Conditioning-related protection from acoustic injury: effects of chronic deefferentation and sham surgery.

Authors:  S G Kujawa; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Variability of noise-induced damage in the guinea pig cochlea: electrophysiological and morphological correlates after strictly controlled exposures.

Authors:  A R Cody; D Robertson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  102 in total

1.  Variation in inter-animal susceptibility to noise damage is associated with alpha 9 acetylcholine receptor subunit expression level.

Authors:  Anne E Luebke; Paul K Foster
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Sound-evoked olivocochlear activation in unanesthetized mice.

Authors:  Anna R Chambers; Kenneth E Hancock; Stéphane F Maison; M Charles Liberman; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-13

3.  Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-22

4.  A multifrequency method for determining cochlear efferent activity.

Authors:  Anne E Luebke; Paul K Foster; Barden B Stagner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-03

Review 5.  Protection from acoustic trauma is not a primary function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system.

Authors:  E Christopher Kirk; David W Smith
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06-06

Review 6.  [Diagnostics of the cochlear amplifier by means of DPOAE growth functions].

Authors:  T Janssen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Current aspects of hearing loss from occupational and leisure noise.

Authors:  S Plontke; H-P Zenner
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-12-28

8.  What is the role of the medial olivocochlear system in speech-in-noise processing?

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; A Roger D Thornton; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Contralateral-noise effects on cochlear responses in anesthetized mice are dominated by feedback from an unknown pathway.

Authors:  Stéphane F Maison; Hajime Usubuchi; Douglas E Vetter; A Bélen Elgoyhen; Steven A Thomas; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Slow build-up of cochlear suppression during sustained contralateral noise: central modulation of olivocochlear efferents?

Authors:  Erik Larsen; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.