Literature DB >> 21267622

Evaluating adaptation and olivocochlear efferent feedback as potential explanations of psychophysical overshoot.

Skyler G Jennings1, Michael G Heinz, Elizabeth A Strickland.   

Abstract

Masked detection threshold for a short tone in noise improves as the tone's onset is delayed from the masker's onset. This improvement, known as "overshoot," is maximal at mid-masker levels and is reduced by temporary and permanent cochlear hearing loss. Computational modeling was used in the present study to evaluate proposed physiological mechanisms of overshoot, including classic firing rate adaptation and medial olivocochlear (MOC) feedback, for both normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss conditions. These theories were tested using an established model of the auditory periphery and signal detection theory techniques. The influence of several analysis variables on predicted tone-pip detection in broadband noise was evaluated, including: auditory nerve fiber spontaneous-rate (SR) pooling, range of characteristic frequencies, number of synapses per characteristic frequency, analysis window duration, and detection rule. The results revealed that overshoot similar to perceptual data in terms of both magnitude and level dependence could be predicted when the effects of MOC efferent feedback were included in the auditory nerve model. Conversely, simulations without MOC feedback effects never produced overshoot despite the model's ability to account for classic firing rate adaptation and dynamic range adaptation in auditory nerve responses. Cochlear hearing loss was predicted to reduce the size of overshoot only for model versions that included the effects of MOC efferent feedback. These findings suggest that overshoot in normal and hearing-impaired listeners is mediated by some form of dynamic range adaptation other than what is observed in the auditory nerve of anesthetized animals. Mechanisms for this adaptation may occur at several levels along the auditory pathway. Among these mechanisms, the MOC reflex may play a leading role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21267622      PMCID: PMC3085687          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-011-0256-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  52 in total

1.  Intensity discrimination in forward masking.

Authors:  F G Zeng; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of masker level on overshoot.

Authors:  S P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of masker spectral asymmetry on overshoot in simultaneous masking.

Authors:  S Schmidt; E Zwicker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of masker level on overshoot in running- and frozen-noise maskers.

Authors:  R von Klitzing; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A model for the responses of low-frequency auditory-nerve fibers in cat.

Authors:  L H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of efferent stimulation on basilar membrane displacement in the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  E Murugasu; I J Russell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.

Authors:  T Kawase; B Delgutte; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Overshoot in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Authors:  S P Bacon; G A Takahashi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Dynamic range adaptation to sound level statistics in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Bo Wen; Grace I Wang; Isabel Dean; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A phenomenological model of the synapse between the inner hair cell and auditory nerve: long-term adaptation with power-law dynamics.

Authors:  Muhammad S A Zilany; Ian C Bruce; Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  27 in total

1.  Auditory enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude stems from more than one source.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-06

2.  Recording and labeling at a site along the cochlea shows alignment of medial olivocochlear and auditory nerve tonotopic mappings.

Authors:  M Christian Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Modeling the anti-masking effects of the olivocochlear reflex in auditory nerve responses to tones in sustained noise.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Skyler G Jennings; Michael G Heinz; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04

4.  Modeling the time-varying and level-dependent effects of the medial olivocochlear reflex in auditory nerve responses.

Authors:  Christopher J Smalt; Michael G Heinz; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-12-05

5.  Computational modeling of individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-30

6.  Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Investigating the auditory enhancement phenomenon using behavioral temporal masking patterns.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Evaluating the effects of olivocochlear feedback on psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  New perspectives on the measurement and time course of auditory enhancement.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.