Literature DB >> 22284992

Characterization of a hyper-viscoelastic phantom mimicking biological soft tissue using an abdominal pneumatic driver with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE).

Gwladys E Leclerc1, Laëtitia Debernard, Félix Foucart, Ludovic Robert, Kay M Pelletier, Fabrice Charleux, Richard Ehman, Marie-Christine Ho Ba Tho, Sabine F Bensamoun.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to create a polymer phantom mimicking the mechanical properties of soft tissues using experimental tests and rheological models. Multifrequency Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MMRE) tests were performed on the present phantom with a pneumatic driver to characterize the viscoelastic (μ, η) properties using Voigt, Maxwell, Zener and Springpot models. To optimize the MMRE protocol, the driver behavior was analyzed with a vibrometer. Moreover, the hyperelastic properties of the phantom were determined using compressive tests and Mooney-Rivlin model. The range of frequency to be used with the round driver was found between 60 Hz and 100 Hz as it exhibits one type of vibration mode for the membrane. MRE analysis revealed an increase in the shear modulus with frequency reflecting the viscoelastic properties of the phantom showing similar characteristic of soft tissues. Rheological results demonstrated that Springpot model better revealed the viscoelastic properties (μ=3.45 kPa, η=6.17 Pas) of the phantom and the Mooney-Rivlin coefficients were C(10)=1.09.10(-2) MPa and C(01)=-8.96.10(-3) MPa corresponding to μ=3.95 kPa. These studies suggest that the phantom, mimicking soft tissue, could be used for preliminary MRE tests to identify the optimal parameters necessary for in vivo investigations. Further developments of the phantom may allow clinicians to more accurately mimic healthy and pathological soft tissues using MRE. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22284992      PMCID: PMC3310328          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  25 in total

1.  Noninvasive assessment of the rheological behavior of human organs using multifrequency MR elastography: a study of brain and liver viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Dieter Klatt; Uwe Hamhaber; Patrick Asbach; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  In vivo mechanical characterization of human liver.

Authors:  A Nava; E Mazza; M Furrer; P Villiger; W H Reinhart
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Quantitative viscoelasticity mapping of human liver using supersonic shear imaging: preliminary in vivo feasibility study.

Authors:  Marie Muller; Jean-Luc Gennisson; Thomas Deffieux; Mickaël Tanter; Mathias Fink
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Magnetic resonance elastography with a phased-array acoustic driver system.

Authors:  Yogesh K Mariappan; Phillip J Rossman; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Rapid magnetic resonance elastography of muscle using one-dimensional projection.

Authors:  Sabine F Bensamoun; Kevin J Glaser; Stacie I Ringleb; Qingshan Chen; Richard L Ehman; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Diffraction-biased shear wave fields generated with longitudinal magnetic resonance elastography drivers.

Authors:  Meng Yin; Olivier Rouvière; Kevin J Glaser; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  MR elastography of the liver: preliminary results.

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Meng Yin; M Alex Dresner; Phillip J Rossman; Lawrence J Burgart; Jeff L Fidler; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Assessment of liver viscoelasticity using multifrequency MR elastography.

Authors:  Patrick Asbach; Dieter Klatt; Uwe Hamhaber; Jürgen Braun; Rajan Somasundaram; Bernd Hamm; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Copolymer-in-oil phantom materials for elastography.

Authors:  J Oudry; C Bastard; V Miette; R Willinger; L Sandrin
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Meng Yin; Jayant A Talwalkar; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Roger C Grimm; Phillip J Rossman; Jeff L Fidler; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 11.382

View more
  4 in total

1.  Reliable preparation of agarose phantoms for use in quantitative magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Grace McIlvain; Elahe Ganji; Catherine Cooper; Megan L Killian; Babatunde A Ogunnaike; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-05-03

2.  Phantom evaluations of nonlinear inversion MR elastography.

Authors:  Ligin M Solamen; Matthew D McGarry; Likun Tan; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Parameter identification in a generalized time-harmonic Rayleigh damping model for elastography.

Authors:  Elijah E W Van Houten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Ex-vivo quantification of ovine pia arachnoid complex biomechanical properties under uniaxial tension.

Authors:  Gabryel Conley Natividad; Sophia K Theodossiou; Nathan R Schiele; Gordon K Murdoch; Alkiviadis Tsamis; Bertrand Tanner; Gabriel Potirniche; Martin Mortazavi; David A Vorp; Bryn A Martin
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2020-11-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.