Literature DB >> 31100487

Reliable preparation of agarose phantoms for use in quantitative magnetic resonance elastography.

Grace McIlvain1, Elahe Ganji2, Catherine Cooper3, Megan L Killian1, Babatunde A Ogunnaike4, Curtis L Johnson5.   

Abstract

Agarose phantoms are one type of phantom commonly used in developing in vivo brain magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) sequences because they are inexpensive and easy to work with, store, and dispose of; however, protocols for creating agarose phantoms are non-standardized and often result in inconsistent phantoms with significant variability in mechanical properties. Many magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound studies use phantoms, but often these phantoms are not tailored for desired mechanical properties and as such are too stiff or not mechanically consistent enough to be used in MRE. In this work, we conducted a systematic study of agarose phantom creation parameters to identify those factors that are most conducive to producing mechanically consistent agarose phantoms for MRE research. We found that cooling rate and liquid temperature affected phantom homogeneity. Phantom stiffness is affected by agar concentration (quadratically), by final liquid temperature and salt content in phantoms, and by the interaction of these two metrics each with stir rate. We captured and quantified the implied relationships with a regression model that can be used to estimate stiffness of resulting phantoms. Additionally, we characterized repeatability, stability over time, impact on MR signal parameters, and differences in agar gel microstructure. This protocol and regression model should prove beneficial in future MRE development studies that use phantoms to determine stiffness measurement accuracy.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agarose; Magnetic resonance elastography; Phantoms; Stiffness; Viscoelasticity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31100487      PMCID: PMC6699912          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  45 in total

1.  Three-dimensional subzone-based reconstruction algorithm for MR elastography.

Authors:  E E Van Houten; M I Miga; J B Weaver; F E Kennedy; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  New insight into agarose gel mechanical properties.

Authors:  V Normand; D L Lootens; E Amici; K P Plucknett; P Aymard
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.988

3.  Characterization of a hyper-viscoelastic phantom mimicking biological soft tissue using an abdominal pneumatic driver with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE).

Authors:  Gwladys E Leclerc; Laëtitia Debernard; Félix Foucart; Ludovic Robert; Kay M Pelletier; Fabrice Charleux; Richard Ehman; Marie-Christine Ho Ba Tho; Sabine F Bensamoun
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Double dissociation of structure-function relationships in memory and fluid intelligence observed with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Curtis L Johnson; Hillary Schwarb; Kevin M Horecka; Matthew D J McGarry; Charles H Hillman; Arthur F Kramer; Neal J Cohen; Aron K Barbey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Use of a Rayleigh damping model in elastography.

Authors:  Matthew D J McGarry; Elijah E W Van Houten
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  High-resolution mechanical imaging of the human brain by three-dimensional multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography at 7T.

Authors:  Jürgen Braun; Jing Guo; Ralf Lützkendorf; Jörg Stadler; Sebastian Papazoglou; Sebastian Hirsch; Ingolf Sack; Johannes Bernarding
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Tuning acoustic and mechanical properties of materials for ultrasound phantoms and smart substrates for cell cultures.

Authors:  A Cafarelli; A Verbeni; A Poliziani; P Dario; A Menciassi; L Ricotti
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Nonlinear multiscale regularisation in MR elastography: Towards fine feature mapping.

Authors:  Eric Barnhill; Lyam Hollis; Ingolf Sack; Jürgen Braun; Peter R Hoskins; Pankaj Pankaj; Colin Brown; Edwin J R van Beek; Neil Roberts
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  Modification of agarose with carboxylation and grafting dopamine for promotion of its cell-adhesiveness.

Authors:  Yixue Su; Bin Chu; Yuan Gao; Chaoxi Wu; Lingmin Zhang; Peng Chen; Xiaoying Wang; Shunqing Tang
Journal:  Carbohydr Polym       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 9.381

10.  Observation of direction-dependent mechanical properties in the human brain with multi-excitation MR elastography.

Authors:  Aaron T Anderson; Elijah E W Van Houten; Matthew D J McGarry; Keith D Paulsen; Joseph L Holtrop; Bradley P Sutton; John G Georgiadis; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2016-03-18
View more
  7 in total

1.  Quantitative effects of off-resonance related distortion on brain mechanical property estimation with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Grace McIlvain; Matthew D J McGarry; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Correlated noise in brain magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Ariel J Hannum; Grace McIlvain; Damian Sowinski; Matthew D J McGarry; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Insertion mechanics of amorphous SiC ultra-micro scale neural probes.

Authors:  Negar Geramifard; Behnoush Dousti; Christopher Nguyen; Justin Abbott; Stuart F Cogan; Victor D Varner
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Lorentz force induced shear waves for magnetic resonance elastography applications.

Authors:  Guillaume Flé; Guillaume Gilbert; Pol Grasland-Mongrain; Guy Cloutier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Physical imaging phantoms for simulation of tumor heterogeneity in PET, CT, and MRI: An overview of existing designs.

Authors:  Alejandra Valladares; Thomas Beyer; Ivo Rausch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Nanobubble Liposome Complexes for Diagnostic Imaging and Ultrasound-Triggered Drug Delivery in Cancers: A Theranostic Approach.

Authors:  Ameya Prabhakar; Rinti Banerjee
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2019-09-12

7.  Soft, Conductive, Brain-Like, Coatings at Tips of Microelectrodes Improve Electrical Stability under Chronic, In Vivo Conditions.

Authors:  Arati Sridharan; Jit Muthuswamy
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.891

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.