| Literature DB >> 33183314 |
Gabryel Conley Natividad1, Sophia K Theodossiou1, Nathan R Schiele1, Gordon K Murdoch2, Alkiviadis Tsamis3, Bertrand Tanner4, Gabriel Potirniche5, Martin Mortazavi6, David A Vorp7, Bryn A Martin8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The pia arachnoid complex (PAC) is a cerebrospinal fluid-filled tissue conglomerate that surrounds the brain and spinal cord. Pia mater adheres directly to the surface of the brain while the arachnoid mater adheres to the deep surface of the dura mater. Collagen fibers, known as subarachnoid trabeculae (SAT) fibers, and microvascular structure lie intermediately to the pia and arachnoid meninges. Due to its structural role, alterations to the biomechanical properties of the PAC may change surface stress loading in traumatic brain injury (TBI) caused by sub-concussive hits. The aim of this study was to quantify the mechanical and morphological properties of ovine PAC.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33183314 PMCID: PMC7664091 DOI: 10.1186/s12987-020-00229-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Fluids Barriers CNS ISSN: 2045-8118
Fig. 1Anatomical drawing of pia arachnoid complex showing the a dura mater, b arachnoid mater, c subarachnoid space containing the arachnoid trabeculae fibers and blood vessels, d pia mater, and e brain tissue
Fig. 2Procedure for dissection of the ovine PAC tissue. a Initial midline incision is made on superior and inferior aspect of the skull with lower mandible removes. Cuts are made sequentially (1–4). b Location of dissection of occipital and frontal PAC tissue sample removal and visual image of dissected ovine brain
Fig. 3a PAC with brain matter removed and placed in C-shaped template used for fixture into the load cell. b Bioreactor apparatus with mounted sample within grips and orientation of load cell unixial tension
Fig. 4Stress–strain curves of the ovine PAC specimens when subjected to uniaxial tension. Average curve shown in dark blue
Fig. 5a Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) imaging of the PAC at 860 nm. b Anti-Von Willebrand Factor applied at a concentration by volume of 1:1000 to view the membrane lining of endothelial cells in blood vessels. c DAPI applied at concentration by volume of 1:1000 to view cell nuclei
Fig. 6Single image of the SHG image stack from fiber analysis code developed by Koch et al. Blue lines depict fiber analysis result (skeleton) used to compute fiber-related parameters (see methods) [24]
Review of previously published literature documenting PAC mechanical properties and comparison of results to the present study
| Ref | Tissue | Species | Young’s modulus (MPa) | Test method | Strain rate (s−1) | Ult. stress (MPa) | Ult. strain (%) | Extraction location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conley et al. 2020 (present study) | PAC | Ovine | 7.68 ± 3.0 | Tensile | 0.59 | 2.69 ± 0.76 | 0.60 ± 0.13 | Brain |
| Jin et al. [ | PAC | Bovine | 6.75 ± 0.75 | Tensile | 0.05 | 1.05 ± 0.04 | 35.5 ± 3.9 | Brain |
| Jin et al. [ | PAC | Bovine | 7.52 ± 0.59 | Tensile | 0.5 | 1.17 ± 0.13 | 37.1 ± 2.2 | Brain |
| Jin et al. [ | PAC | Bovine | 10.78 ± 0.58 | Tensile | 5 | 1.53 ± 0.11 | 30.0 ± 3.3 | Brain |
| Jin et al. [ | PAC | Bovine | 40.19 ± 3.54 | Tensile | 100 | 3.48 ± 0.25 | 21.0 ± 1.6 | Brain |
| Kimpara et al. [ | PAC | Porcine | 26.5 ± 3.51 | Tensile | 0.005 | 9.8 ± 1.7 | 43.2 ± 5.6 | Spinal Cord—Denticulate ligament |
| Kimpara et al. [ | PAC | Porcine | 30.6 ± 7.35 | Tensile | 0.05 | 10.7 ± 3.1 | 45.6 ± 12.7 | |
| Kimpara et al. [ | PAC | Porcine | 63.9 ± 13.0 | Tensile | 0.5 | 20.1 ± 3.4 | 37.7 ± 11.0 | |
| Kimpara et al. [ | PAC | Porcine | 21.7 ± 2.88 | Tensile | 0.005 | 6.0 ± 1.8 | 29.2 ± 5.6 | Spinal cord—Posterior median septum |
| Kimpara et al. [ | PAC | Porcine | 25.4 ± 3.61 | Tensile | 0.05 | 7.2 ± 1.2 | 35.0 ± 4.8 | |
| Kimpara et al. [ | PAC | Porcine | 39.3 ± 10.4 | Tensile | 0.5 | 9.7 ± 2.5 | 31.6 ± 6.3 | |
| Kimpara et al. [ | PAC | Porcine | 10.8 ± 1.74 | Tensile | 0.005 | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 23.2 ± 5.5 | Spinal Cord—Posterolateral sulcus |
| Kimpara et al. [ | PAC | Porcine | 12.4 ± 1.13 | Tensile | 0.05 | 2.3 ± 0.4 | 21.6 ± 5.1 | |
| Kimpara et al. [ | PAC | Porcine | 13.2 ± 0.98 | Tensile | 0.5 | 2.6 ± 0.6 | 23.4 ± 6.5 | |
| Ozawa et al. [ | PAC | Rabbit | 2.3 | Tensile | N/A | N/A | N/A | Spinal Cord |
Fig. 7Relation of Young’s Modulus and strain rate computed for previous studies published in the literature based on isolated PAC in the spine and brain across bovine, ovine, porcine, and rabbit