Literature DB >> 21672920

Genomic, genetic and functional dissection of bitter taste responses to artificial sweeteners.

Natacha Roudnitzky1, Bernd Bufe, Sophie Thalmann, Christina Kuhn, Howard C Gunn, Chao Xing, Bill P Crider, Maik Behrens, Wolfgang Meyerhof, Stephen P Wooding.   

Abstract

Bitter taste perception is initiated by TAS2R receptors, which respond to agonists by triggering depolarization of taste bud cells. Mutations in TAS2Rs are known to affect taste phenotypes by altering receptor function. Evidence that TAS2Rs overlap in ligand specificity suggests that they may also contribute joint effects. To explore this aspect of gustation, we examined bitter perception of saccharin and acesulfame K, widely used artificial sweeteners with aversive aftertastes. Both substances are agonists of TAS2R31 and -43, which belong to a five-member subfamily (TAS2R30-46) responsive to a diverse constellation of compounds. We analyzed sequence variation and linkage structure in the ∼140 kb genomic region encoding TAS2R30-46, taste responses to the two sweeteners in subjects, and functional characteristics of receptor alleles. Whole-gene sequences from TAS2R30-46 in 60 Caucasian subjects revealed extensive diversity including 34 missense mutations, two nonsense mutations and high-frequency copy-number variants. Thirty markers, including non-synonymous variants in all five genes, were associated (P< 0.001) with responses to saccharin and acesulfame K. However, linkage disequilibrium (LD) in the region was high (D', r(2) > 0.95). Haplotype analyses revealed that most associations were spurious, arising from LD with variants in TAS2R31. In vitro assays confirmed the functional importance of four TAS2R31 mutations, which had independent effects on receptor response. The existence of high LD spanning functionally distinct TAS2R loci predicts that bitter taste responses to many compounds will be strongly correlated even when they are mediated by different genes. Integrative approaches combining phenotypic, genetic and functional analysis will be essential in dissecting these complex relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21672920     DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddr252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  38 in total

1.  Human bitter perception correlates with bitter receptor messenger RNA expression in taste cells.

Authors:  Sarah V Lipchock; Julie A Mennella; Andrew I Spielman; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Preference for sucralose predicts behavioral responses to sweet and bittersweet tastants.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ann-Marie Torregrossa; Chris Carballo; Lisa A Eckel
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 3.  Genetics of taste receptors.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; Cailu Lin; Ichiro Matsumoto; Makoto Ohmoto; Danielle R Reed; Theodore M Nelson
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

4.  Class I odorant receptors, TAS1R and TAS2R taste receptors, are markers for subpopulations of circulating leukocytes.

Authors:  Agne Malki; Julia Fiedler; Kristina Fricke; Ines Ballweg; Michael W Pfaffl; Dietmar Krautwurst
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 4.962

Review 5.  Evaluation of Sweetener Synergy in Humans by Isobole Analyses.

Authors:  M Michelle Reyes; Stephen A Gravina; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Taste Exam: A Brief and Validated Test.

Authors:  Jennifer E Douglas; Corrine J Mansfield; Charles J Arayata; Beverly J Cowart; Lauren R Colquitt; Ivy W Maina; Mariel T Blasetti; Noam A Cohen; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Determinants of taste preference and acceptability: quality versus hedonics.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ginger D Blonde; Lisa A Eckel; Alan C Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Ingestion of bacterial lipopolysaccharide inhibits peripheral taste responses to sucrose in mice.

Authors:  X Zhu; L He; L P McCluskey
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Examination of the perception of sweet- and bitter-like taste qualities in sucralose preferring and avoiding rats.

Authors:  A-M Torregrossa; G C Loney; J C Smith; L A Eckel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-10

10.  Taste function in early stage treated and untreated Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Richard L Doty; Michael T Nsoesie; Inna Chung; Allen Osman; Ian Pawasarat; Julie Caulfield; Howard Hurtig; Jonathan Silas; Jacob Dubroff; John E Duda; Gui-Shuang Ying; Hakan Tekeli; Fidias E Leon-Sarmiento
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.