Literature DB >> 22279214

Human motor plasticity induced by mirror visual feedback.

Ippei Nojima1, Tatsuya Mima, Satoko Koganemaru, Mohamed Nasreldin Thabit, Hidenao Fukuyama, Toshio Kawamata.   

Abstract

The clinical use of mirror visual feedback (MVF) was initially introduced to alleviate phantom pain, and has since been applied to the improvement of hemiparesis following stroke. However, it is not known whether MVF can restore motor function by producing plastic changes in the human primary motor cortex (M1). Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation to test whether M1 plasticity is a physiological substrate of MVF-induced motor behavioral improvement. MVF intervention in normal volunteers using a mirror box improved motor behavior and enhanced excitatory functions of the M1. Moreover, behavioral and physiological measures of MVF-induced changes were positively correlated with each other. Improved motor performance occurred after observation of a simple action, but not after repetitive motor training of the nontarget hand without MVF, suggesting the crucial importance of visual feedback. The beneficial effects of MVF were disrupted by continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over the M1, but not the control site in the occipital cortex. However, MVF following cTBS could further improve the motor functions. Our findings indicate that M1 plasticity, especially in its excitatory connections, is an essential component of MVF-based therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22279214      PMCID: PMC6796271          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5364-11.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  64 in total

1.  Magnetic stimulation: motor evoked potentials. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.

Authors:  J C Rothwell; M Hallett; A Berardelli; A Eisen; P Rossini; W Paulus
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1999

2.  The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses.

Authors:  G R Fink; J C Marshall; P W Halligan; C D Frith; J Driver; R S Frackowiak; R J Dolan
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  A Ferbert; A Priori; J C Rothwell; B L Day; J G Colebatch; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by the social dimension of observed actions.

Authors:  Luisa Sartori; Andrea Cavallo; Giulia Bucchioni; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway.

Authors:  H Devanne; B A Lavoie; C Capaday
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Recovery of upper-limb function due to enhanced use-dependent plasticity in chronic stroke patients.

Authors:  Satoko Koganemaru; Tatsuya Mima; Mohamed Nasreldin Thabit; Tomoko Ikkaku; Kenji Shimada; Madoka Kanematsu; Kazuko Takahashi; Gharib Fawi; Ryosuke Takahashi; Hidenao Fukuyama; Kazuhisa Domen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Graded motor imagery is effective for long-standing complex regional pain syndrome: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  G L Moseley
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Human motor associative plasticity induced by paired bihemispheric stimulation.

Authors:  Satoko Koganemaru; Tatsuya Mima; Masahiro Nakatsuka; Yoshino Ueki; Hidenao Fukuyama; Kazuhisa Domen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  A controlled pilot study of the utility of mirror visual feedback in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (type 1).

Authors:  C S McCabe; R C Haigh; E F J Ring; P W Halligan; P D Wall; D R Blake
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.580

10.  Effects of diphenylhydantoin on motor potentials evoked with magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  N Mavroudakis; J M Caroyer; E Brunko; D Zegers de Beyl
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-12
View more
  52 in total

1.  Altered visual feedback modulates cortical excitability in a mirror-box-like paradigm.

Authors:  Irene Senna; Cristina Russo; Cesare Valerio Parise; Irene Ferrario; Nadia Bolognini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Role of the mirror-neuron system in cross-education.

Authors:  Tjerk Zult; Glyn Howatson; Endre E Kádár; Jonathan P Farthing; Tibor Hortobágyi
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Exploring the impact of visual and movement based priming on a motor intervention in the acute phase post-stroke in persons with severe hemiparesis of the upper extremity.

Authors:  Jigna Patel; Qinyin Qiu; Mathew Yarossi; Alma Merians; Supriya Massood; Eugene Tunik; Sergei Adamovich; Gerard Fluet
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  Visual illusion of tool use recalibrates tactile perception.

Authors:  Luke E Miller; Matthew R Longo; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-02-11

5.  Improving motor performance without training: the effect of combining mirror visual feedback with transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Erik von Rein; Maike Hoff; Elisabeth Kaminski; Bernhard Sehm; Christopher J Steele; Arno Villringer; Patrick Ragert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Determining the potential sites of neural adaptation to cross-education: implications for the cross-education of muscle strength.

Authors:  Ashlyn K Frazer; Alan J Pearce; Glyn Howatson; Kevin Thomas; Stuart Goodall; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Mirror illusion reduces motor cortical inhibition in the ipsilateral primary motor cortex during forceful unilateral muscle contractions.

Authors:  Tjerk Zult; Stuart Goodall; Kevin Thomas; Tibor Hortobágyi; Glyn Howatson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Biomarkers and predictors of restorative therapy effects after stroke.

Authors:  Erin Burke; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.081

9.  Mirror visual feedback can induce motor learning in patients with callosal disconnection.

Authors:  Ippei Nojima; Tatsuhide Oga; Hidenao Fukuyama; Toshio Kawamata; Tatsuya Mima
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Removing visual feedback for a single limb alters between-limb force tremor relationships during isometric bilateral contractions.

Authors:  Leanne C Kenway; Leanne M Bisset; Justin J Kavanagh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.