Literature DB >> 25632079

Improving motor performance without training: the effect of combining mirror visual feedback with transcranial direct current stimulation.

Erik von Rein1, Maike Hoff1, Elisabeth Kaminski1, Bernhard Sehm1, Christopher J Steele1, Arno Villringer2, Patrick Ragert3.   

Abstract

Mirror visual feedback (MVF) during motor training has been shown to improve motor performance of the untrained hand. Here we thought to determine if MVF-induced performance improvements of the left hand can be augmented by upregulating plasticity in right primary motor cortex (M1) by means of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) while subjects trained with the right hand. Participants performed a ball-rotation task with either their left (untrained) or right (trained) hand on two consecutive days (days 1 and 2). During training with the right hand, MVF was provided concurrent with two tDCS conditions: group 1 received a-tDCS over right M1 (n = 10), whereas group 2 received sham tDCS (s-tDCS, n = 10). On day 2, performance was reevaluated under the same experimental conditions compared with day 1 but without tDCS. While baseline performance of the left hand (day 1) was not different between groups, a-tDCS exhibited stronger MVF-induced performance improvements compared with s-tDCS. Similar results were observed for day 2 (without tDCS application). A control experiment (n = 8) with a-tDCS over right M1 as outlined above but without MVF revealed that left hand improvement was significantly less pronounced than that induced by combined a-tDCS and MVF. Based on these results, we provide novel evidence that upregulating activity in the untrained M1 by means of a-tDCS is capable of augmenting MVF-induced performance improvements in young normal volunteers. Our findings suggest that concurrent MVF and tDCS might have synergistic and additive effects on motor performance of the untrained hand, a result of relevance for clinical approaches in neurorehabilitation and/or exercise science.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mirror visual feedback; motor learning; primary motor cortex; transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25632079      PMCID: PMC4416593          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00832.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  28 in total

1.  Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Astrid Schauenburg; Nicolas Lang; David Liebetanz; Cornelia Exner; Walter Paulus; Frithjof Tergau
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Human motor plasticity induced by mirror visual feedback.

Authors:  Ippei Nojima; Tatsuya Mima; Satoko Koganemaru; Mohamed Nasreldin Thabit; Hidenao Fukuyama; Toshio Kawamata
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Bradley W Vines; Dinesh G Nair; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Three-dimensional locations and boundaries of motor and premotor cortices as defined by functional brain imaging: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mary A Mayka; Daniel M Corcos; Sue E Leurgans; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Heidi M Schambra; Leonardo G Cohen; Ethan R Buch; Brita Fritsch; Eric Zarahn; Pablo A Celnik; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non-invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects.

Authors:  M C Ridding; U Ziemann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Mirror visual feedback can induce motor learning in patients with callosal disconnection.

Authors:  Ippei Nojima; Tatsuhide Oga; Hidenao Fukuyama; Toshio Kawamata; Tatsuya Mima
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Illusory movements of the paralyzed limb restore motor cortex activity.

Authors:  P Giraux; A Sirigu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Graded motor imagery is effective for long-standing complex regional pain syndrome: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  G L Moseley
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Degree of handedness affects intermanual transfer of skill learning.

Authors:  Cori Chase; Rachael Seidler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  13 in total

1.  Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Virtual Reality-Based Paradigm for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Individuals with Restricted Movements. A Feasibility Study with a Chronic Stroke Survivor with Severe Hemiparesis.

Authors:  María Antonia Fuentes; Adrián Borrego; Jorge Latorre; Carolina Colomer; Mariano Alcañiz; María José Sánchez-Ledesma; Enrique Noé; Roberto Llorens
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  The Modulatory Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in Combination With Mirror Hand Motor Training on Functional Connectivity: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Authors:  Jack Jiaqi Zhang; Kenneth N K Fong
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.492

3.  The Influence of Mirror-Visual Feedback on Training-Induced Motor Performance Gains in the Untrained Hand.

Authors:  Paola Reissig; Rohan Puri; Michael I Garry; Jeffery J Summers; Mark R Hinder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Modulating Motor Learning through Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation: An Integrative View.

Authors:  Claudia Ammann; Danny Spampinato; Javier Márquez-Ruiz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-23

5.  Neural Correlates of Mirror Visual Feedback-Induced Performance Improvements: A Resting-State fMRI Study.

Authors:  Viola Rjosk; Jöran Lepsien; Elisabeth Kaminski; Maike Hoff; Bernhard Sehm; Christopher J Steele; Arno Villringer; Patrick Ragert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Effects of High-Definition and Conventional Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation on Motor Learning in Children.

Authors:  Lauran Cole; Adrianna Giuffre; Patrick Ciechanski; Helen L Carlson; Ephrem Zewdie; Hsing-Ching Kuo; Adam Kirton
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over S1 Differentially Modulates Proprioceptive Accuracy in Young and Old Adults.

Authors:  Toni Muffel; Franziska Kirsch; Pei-Cheng Shih; Benjamin Kalloch; Sara Schaumberg; Arno Villringer; Bernhard Sehm
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Mirror Visual Feedback-Induced Performance Improvement and the Influence of Hand Dominance.

Authors:  Viola Rjosk; Elisabeth Kaminski; Maike Hoff; Bernhard Sehm; Christopher J Steele; Arno Villringer; Patrick Ragert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Effect of visual feedback during laparoscopic basic training using a box trainer with a transparent top.

Authors:  Kosei Maemura; Yuko Mataki; Hiroshi Kurahara; Yota Kawasaki; Shinichirou Mori; Satoshi Iino; Masahiko Sakoda; Shinichi Ueno; Hiroyuki Shinchi; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2017-06-07

10.  Effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation on laparoscopic surgical skill acquisition.

Authors:  P Ciechanski; A Cheng; O Damji; S Lopushinsky; K Hecker; Z Jadavji; A Kirton
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.