Literature DB >> 25632077

Mirror illusion reduces motor cortical inhibition in the ipsilateral primary motor cortex during forceful unilateral muscle contractions.

Tjerk Zult1, Stuart Goodall2, Kevin Thomas2, Tibor Hortobágyi3, Glyn Howatson4.   

Abstract

Forceful, unilateral contractions modulate corticomotor paths targeting the resting, contralateral hand. However, it is unknown whether mirror-viewing of a slowly moving but forcefully contracting hand would additionally affect these paths. Here we examined corticospinal excitability and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) of the right-ipsilateral primary motor cortex (M1) in healthy young adults under no-mirror and mirror conditions at rest and during right wrist flexion at 60% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). During the no-mirror conditions neither hand was visible, whereas in the mirror conditions participants looked at the right hand's reflection in the mirror. Corticospinal excitability increased during contractions in the left flexor carpi radialis (FCR) (contraction 0.41 mV vs. rest 0.21 mV) and extensor carpi radialis (ECR) (contraction 0.56 mV vs. rest 0.39 mV), but there was no mirror effect (FCR: P = 0.743, ηp (2) = 0.005; ECR: P = 0.712, ηp (2) = 0.005). However, mirror-viewing of the contracting and moving wrist attenuated SICI relative to test pulse in the left FCR by ∼9% compared with the other conditions (P < 0.05, d ≥ 0.62). Electromyographic activity in the resting left hand prior to stimulation was not affected by the mirror (FCR: P = 0.255, ηp (2) = 0.049; ECR: P = 0.343, ηp (2) = 0.035) but increased twofold during contractions. Thus viewing the moving hand in the mirror and not just the mirror image of the nonmoving hand seems to affect motor cortical inhibitory networks in the M1 associated with the mirror image. Future studies should determine whether the use of a mirror could increase interlimb transfer produced by cross-education, especially in patient groups with unilateral orthopedic and neurological conditions.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cross-education; mirror training; primary motor cortex; strength training; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25632077      PMCID: PMC4416555          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00686.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  73 in total

1.  Time-varying changes in corticospinal excitability accompanying the triphasic EMG pattern in humans.

Authors:  C D MacKinnon; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Changes in segmental and motor cortical output with contralateral muscle contractions and altered sensory inputs in humans.

Authors:  Tibor Hortobágyi; Janet L Taylor; Nicolas T Petersen; Gabrielle Russell; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Vision modulates corticospinal suppression in a functionally specific manner during movement of the opposite limb.

Authors:  Richard G Carson; Kathy L Ruddy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The origin of activity in the biceps brachii muscle during voluntary contractions of the contralateral elbow flexor muscles.

Authors:  Inge Zijdewind; Jane E Butler; Simon C Gandevia; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Mechanisms underlying functional changes in the primary motor cortex ipsilateral to an active hand.

Authors:  Monica A Perez; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Dominance of vision over proprioception on motor programming: evidence from ERP.

Authors:  Pascale Touzalin-Chretien; Solange Ehrler; André Dufour
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Cross-exercise on quadriceps deficit after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Maria Papandreou; Evdokia Billis; George Papathanasiou; Panagiotis Spyropoulos; Nikos Papaioannou
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Disinhibition in the human motor cortex is enhanced by synchronous upper limb movements.

Authors:  James W Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  The corticospinal tract from the viewpoint of brain rehabilitation.

Authors:  Sung Ho Jang
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Mirror training to augment cross-education during resistance training: a hypothesis.

Authors:  Glyn Howatson; Tjerk Zult; Jonathan P Farthing; Inge Zijdewind; Tibor Hortobágyi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Determining the potential sites of neural adaptation to cross-education: implications for the cross-education of muscle strength.

Authors:  Ashlyn K Frazer; Alan J Pearce; Glyn Howatson; Kevin Thomas; Stuart Goodall; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The TMS Motor Map Does Not Change Following a Single Session of Mirror Training Either with Or without Motor Imagery.

Authors:  Mark van de Ruit; Michael J Grey
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  The Cross-Education Phenomenon: Brain and Beyond.

Authors:  Ashlee M Hendy; Séverine Lamon
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Ipsilateral Lower-to-Upper Limb Cross-Transfer Effect on Muscle Strength, Mechanical Power, and Lean Tissue Mass after Accentuated Eccentric Loading.

Authors:  Hashish R Magdi; Sergio Maroto-Izquierdo; José Antonio de Paz
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.