Literature DB >> 28196765

Visual illusion of tool use recalibrates tactile perception.

Luke E Miller1, Matthew R Longo2, Ayse P Saygin3.   

Abstract

Brief use of a tool recalibrates multisensory representations of the user's body, a phenomenon called tool embodiment. Despite two decades of research, little is known about its boundary conditions. It has been widely argued that embodiment requires active tool use, suggesting a critical role for somatosensory and motor feedback. The present study used a visual illusion to cast doubt on this view. We used a mirror-based setup to induce a visual experience of tool use with an arm that was in fact stationary. Following illusory tool use, tactile perception was recalibrated on this stationary arm, and with equal magnitude as physical use. Recalibration was not found following illusory passive tool holding, and could not be accounted for by sensory conflict or general interhemispheric plasticity. These results suggest visual tool-use signals play a critical role in driving tool embodiment.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body representation; Embodiment; Multisensory; Plasticity; Psychophysics; Somatosensory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28196765      PMCID: PMC5992321          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  76 in total

1.  Organization of visual inputs to the inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in macaques.

Authors:  J S Baizer; L G Ungerleider; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Interhemispheric transfer of plasticity in the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  M B Calford; R Tweedale
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-08-17       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema.

Authors:  Lucilla Cardinali; Francesca Frassinetti; Claudio Brozzoli; Christian Urquizar; Alice C Roy; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Interval bias in 2AFC detection tasks: sorting out the artifacts.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Rocío Alcalá-Quintana
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Visual bias of unseen hand position with a mirror: spatial and temporal factors.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Weber's illusion and body shape: anisotropy of tactile size perception on the hand.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The representation of tool use in humans and monkeys: common and uniquely human features.

Authors:  R Peeters; L Simone; K Nelissen; M Fabbri-Destro; W Vanduffel; G Rizzolatti; G A Orban
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  When mirrors lie: "visual capture" of arm position impairs reaching performance.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Gemma Crozier; Charles Spence
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Kathryn E Lee; James V Haxby; Alex Martin
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Scaling space with the mirror illusion: the influence of body plasticity on perceived affordances.

Authors:  Sarah H Creem-Regehr; Brandon S Payne; Kristina M Rand; Grace Hansen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04
View more
  14 in total

1.  The recalibration of tactile perception during tool use is body-part specific.

Authors:  Luke E Miller; Andrew Cawley-Bennett; Matthew R Longo; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Different tool training induces specific effects on body metric representation.

Authors:  Daniele Romano; Elena Uberti; Pietro Caggiano; Gianna Cocchini; Angelo Maravita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  The Influence of Auditory Cues on Bodily and Movement Perception.

Authors:  Tasha R Stanton; Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-17

4.  Same action in different spatial locations induces selective modulation of body metric representation.

Authors:  Pietro Caggiano; Elena Bertone; Gianna Cocchini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  No evidence for sex differences in tactile distance anisotropy.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Tactile distance illusions reflect a coherent stretch of tactile space.

Authors:  Federico Fiori; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Experimentally induced pain does not influence updating of peripersonal space and body representations following tool-use.

Authors:  Axel D Vittersø; Monika Halicka; Gavin Buckingham; Michael J Proulx; Janet H Bultitude
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  A Conceptual Model of Tactile Processing across Body Features of Size, Shape, Side, and Spatial Location.

Authors:  Luigi Tamè; Elena Azañón; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-26

9.  Hand Posture Modulates Perceived Tactile Distance.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effects of prolonged exposure to feedback delay on the qualitative subjective experience of virtual reality.

Authors:  Loes C J van Dam; Joey R Stephens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.