Literature DB >> 20688810

Recovery of upper-limb function due to enhanced use-dependent plasticity in chronic stroke patients.

Satoko Koganemaru1, Tatsuya Mima, Mohamed Nasreldin Thabit, Tomoko Ikkaku, Kenji Shimada, Madoka Kanematsu, Kazuko Takahashi, Gharib Fawi, Ryosuke Takahashi, Hidenao Fukuyama, Kazuhisa Domen.   

Abstract

Patients with chronic stroke often show increased flexor hypertonia in their affected upper limbs. Although an intervention strategy targeting the extensors of the affected upper limb might thus be expected to have benefits for functional recovery, conventional repetitive motor training has limited clinical utility. Recent studies have shown that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation could induce motor recovery. The present study tested whether 5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the upper-limb area of the primary motor cortex, combined with extensor motor training, had a greater effect on motor recovery than either intervention alone in stroke hemiparesis. Nine patients with chronic subcortical stroke and nine age-matched healthy subjects completed the crossover study. In separate sessions, we examined the single intervention effect of repetitive wrist and finger extension exercises aided by neuromuscular stimulation, the single intervention effect of 5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and the combined effect of the two interventions. The motor functions were evaluated behaviourally in patients (Experiment 1) and electrophysiologically in healthy subjects (Experiment 2), both before and after the intervention. In addition, we tested the long-term effect by repeating the combined interventions 12 times in patients (Experiment 3). The motor functions were measured again 2 weeks after the end of the repetitive intervention period. In Experiment 1, the combined intervention, but neither of the single interventions, resulted in an improvement of extensor movement (P < 0.0001) and grip power (P < 0.05), along with a reduction of flexor hypertonia (P < 0.01), in their paretic upper limbs. In Experiment 2, only the combined intervention resulted in selective plastic changes of cortico-spinal excitability (P < 0.01), motor threshold (P < 0.001) and silent period (P < 0.01) for the extensors. In Experiment 3, we also confirmed long-term beneficial effects of the combined intervention in patients. These findings indicate that combining motor training with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can facilitate use-dependent plasticity and achieve functional recovery of motor impairments that cannot be attained by either intervention alone. This method could be a powerful rehabilitative approach for patients with hemiparetic stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20688810     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awq193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  26 in total

1.  Human motor plasticity induced by mirror visual feedback.

Authors:  Ippei Nojima; Tatsuya Mima; Satoko Koganemaru; Mohamed Nasreldin Thabit; Hidenao Fukuyama; Toshio Kawamata
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the prediction and enhancement of rehabilitation treatment effects.

Authors:  Michelle Harris-Love
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 3.  Noninvasive brain stimulation in neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

4.  Targeted, activity-dependent spinal stimulation produces long-lasting motor recovery in chronic cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jacob G McPherson; Robert R Miller; Steve I Perlmutter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A Comparison of Primed Low-frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatments in Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Jessica M Cassidy; Haitao Chu; David C Anderson; Linda E Krach; LeAnn Snow; Teresa J Kimberley; James R Carey
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 6.  Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  Michael A Dimyan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 42.937

7.  Timing of motor cortical stimulation during planar robotic training differentially impacts neuroplasticity in older adults.

Authors:  Crystal L Massie; Shailesh S Kantak; Priya Narayanan; George F Wittenberg
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 8.  New modalities of brain stimulation for stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  M A Edwardson; T H Lucas; J R Carey; E E Fetz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Combined Brain and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Moderate to Severe Motor Impairment.

Authors:  Isabella S Menezes; Leonardo G Cohen; Eduardo A Mello; André G Machado; Paul Hunter Peckham; Sarah M Anjos; Inara L Siqueira; Juliana Conti; Ela B Plow; Adriana B Conforto
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-10-25

10.  Evidence of neuroplasticity with robotic hand exoskeleton for post-stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Neha Singh; Megha Saini; Nand Kumar; M V Padma Srivastava; Amit Mehndiratta
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.