Chemical modification can significantly enrich the structural and functional repertoire of ribonucleic acids and endow them with new outstanding properties. Here, we report the syntheses of novel 2'-azido cytidine and 2'-azido guanosine building blocks and demonstrate their efficient site-specific incorporation into RNA by mastering the synthetic challenge of using phosphoramidite chemistry in the presence of azido groups. Our study includes the detailed characterization of 2'-azido nucleoside containing RNA using UV-melting profile analysis and CD and NMR spectroscopy. Importantly, the X-ray crystallographic analysis of 2'-azido uridine and 2'-azido adenosine modified RNAs reveals crucial structural details of this modification within an A-form double helical environment. The 2'-azido group supports the C3'-endo ribose conformation and shows distinct water-bridged hydrogen bonding patterns in the minor groove. Additionally, siRNA induced silencing of the brain acid soluble protein (BASP1) encoding gene in chicken fibroblasts demonstrated that 2'-azido modifications are well tolerated in the guide strand, even directly at the cleavage site. Furthermore, the 2'-azido modifications are compatible with 2'-fluoro and/or 2'-O-methyl modifications to achieve siRNAs of rich modification patterns and tunable properties, such as increased nuclease resistance or additional chemical reactivity. The latter was demonstrated by the utilization of the 2'-azido groups for bioorthogonal Click reactions that allows efficient fluorescent labeling of the RNA. In summary, the present comprehensive investigation on site-specifically modified 2'-azido RNA including all four nucleosides provides a basic rationale behind the physico- and biochemical properties of this flexible and thus far neglected type of RNA modification.
Chemical modification can significantly enrich the structural and functional repertoire of ribonucleic acids and endow them with new outstanding properties. Here, we report the syntheses of novel 2'-azido cytidine and 2'-azido guanosine building blocks and demonstrate their efficient site-specific incorporation into RNA by mastering the synthetic challenge of using phosphoramidite chemistry in the presence of azido groups. Our study includes the detailed characterization of 2'-azido nucleoside containing RNA using UV-melting profile analysis and CD and NMR spectroscopy. Importantly, the X-ray crystallographic analysis of 2'-azido uridine and 2'-azido adenosine modified RNAs reveals crucial structural details of this modification within an A-form double helical environment. The 2'-azido group supports the C3'-endo ribose conformation and shows distinct water-bridged hydrogen bonding patterns in the minor groove. Additionally, siRNA induced silencing of the brain acid soluble protein (BASP1) encoding gene in chicken fibroblasts demonstrated that 2'-azido modifications are well tolerated in the guide strand, even directly at the cleavage site. Furthermore, the 2'-azido modifications are compatible with 2'-fluoro and/or 2'-O-methyl modifications to achieve siRNAs of rich modification patterns and tunable properties, such as increased nuclease resistance or additional chemical reactivity. The latter was demonstrated by the utilization of the 2'-azido groups for bioorthogonal Click reactions that allows efficient fluorescent labeling of the RNA. In summary, the present comprehensive investigation on site-specifically modified 2'-azido RNA including all four nucleosides provides a basic rationale behind the physico- and biochemical properties of this flexible and thus far neglected type of RNA modification.
The structural and functional
repertoire of ribonucleic acids (RNA) can be significantly manipulated
by chemical modifications. This is of particular importance for two
major tools in current RNA research, namely, RNA interference (RNAi)
and RNA bioconjugation. RNAi is a post-transcriptional gene silencing
mechanism induced by small interfering RNA (siRNA) and micro-RNA (miRNA).[1,2] It has become one of the major tools for gene function analysis
and has also been confronted with high expectations for the development
of siRNA and miRNA as therapeutic agents to treat diseases.[3,4] However, for applications of siRNA as therapeutic agents, chemical
modification is obligatory to enhance nuclease resistance, to prevent
immune activation, to decrease off-target effects, and to improve
pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties.[5−9] Additionally, the modifications should help these
agents to penetrate cell membranes and improve siRNA delivery which
remains one of the major challenges.[10] This
latter issue closes the circle from siRNAs to bioconjugation since
many approaches require an attachment of the nucleic acid portion
to transporter units of diverse structure (such as peptides, lipids
or cofactors) or labeling with fluorescence dyes to track the siRNAs
in the cell. Both types of conjugates are accessible via modern bioorthogonal
conjugation reactions.[11,12]In a recent communication,
we have originally reported on 2′-azido
modified RNA.[13] Surprisingly, this modification
had previously been neglected in the context of siRNA, most likely
because of expected synthetic difficulties[14] with standard solid-phase RNA phosphoramidite chemistry based on
the inherent reactivity between phosphor-III species and azides. Nevertheless,
the prospect of possible siRNA applications,[6] but also of promising applications in modern bioconjugation chemistry,[11,12] prompted us to target 2′-azido RNA. We synthesized phosphodiester
building blocks of 2′-azido-2′-deoxyuridine and 2′-azido-2′-deoxyadenosine
and demonstrated that their coupling under standard conditions of
RNA phosphotriester chemistry together with standard phosphoramidite
chemistry for assembly of the other nucleotides works sufficiently
well to achieve these RNA derivatives.[13]Here, we present the synthesis of the novel phosphodiester
building
blocks of 2′-azido-2′-deoxycytidine 7 and
2′-azido-2′-deoxyguanosine 17 and expand
the site-specific introduction of the 2′-azido modification
into RNA to all four canonical nucleosides (Figure 1). Our study includes the detailed characterization of the
2′-azido modified RNA using UV, CD, and NMR spectroscopy. Importantly,
we have solved the X-ray structures of 2′-azido containing
model double helices at atomic resolution and we performed a series
of experiments to evaluate their siRNA performance and potential for
labeling using Click chemistry.
Figure 1
Structure of RNA with site-specifically
2′-azido-modified
nucleosides. Such derivatives carry high potential for bioconjugations
and applications in RNA interference.
Structure of RNA with site-specifically
2′-azido-modified
nucleosides. Such derivatives carry high potential for bioconjugations
and applications in RNA interference.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis of 2′-Azido Nucleoside Building Blocks
For building block 7 (Scheme 1), we started the synthesis from the 2′-azido-2′-deoxyuridine
derivative 1,[13] which was
readily obtained from uridine. The 3′-OH of compound 1 was protected applying TBDMS chloride and imidazole in DMF
to furnish derivative 2. Then, reaction of 2 with 2,4,6-triisopropylbenzenesulfonyl chloride in the presence
of triethylamine and DMAP in dichloromethane resulted in regioselective O4-trisylation. After workup, the trisylated
derivative 3 can be used without further purification
and directly converted into 4 upon treatment with aqueous
ammonium hydroxide in THF in 80% yield over the two steps (which is
significantly higher compared to when compound 3 is isolated
and purified by column chromatography). We also note that we applied
aqueous ammonium hydroxide conditions based on our experience from
a previous study where treatment of the 2′-methylseleno analog
of 3 with 7 M NH3 in anhydrous methanol resulted
in the corresponding O4-methyluridine
derivative.[15] Acetylation of the amino
function was then achieved with acetic anhydride in pyridine to provide 5, followed by cleavage of the 3′-O-TBDMS group with 1 M TBAF and 0.5 M acetic acid in THF to give 6. Finally, conversion into the corresponding phosphodiester 7 was achieved in good yields by reaction with in situ generated
2-chlorophenyl chlorophosphorotriazolide in analogy to a general procedure
in the literature.[17] Starting with compound 1, our route provides 7 in a 43% overall yield
in six steps with four chromatographic purifications; in total, 2.1
g of 7 was obtained in the course of this study.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of 2′-Azido Cytidine Building Block 7
Reaction conditions:
(a) 2.0
equiv TBDMSCl, 4.0 equiv imidazole, in DMF, RT, 16 h, 95%; (b) 1.5
equiv 2,4,6-triisopropylbenzenesulfonyl chloride, 10.0 equiv NEt3, 0.12 equiv DMAP, in CH2Cl2, RT, 1
h, 60%; (c) 32% aqueous NH3, in THF, RT, 16 h, 95%; (d)
2.5 equiv acetic anhydride, in pyridine, 0°C to RT, 90 min, 97%;
(e) 1 M TBAF/0.5 M acetic acid, in THF, RT, 2.5 h, 100%; (f) 5.5 equiv
1,2,4-triazole, 5.0 equiv NEt3, 2.5 equiv 2-chlorophenyl
phosphorodichloridate, 4.0 equiv 1-methylimidazole in THF, RT, 1 h,
82%.
Synthesis of 2′-Azido Cytidine Building Block 7
Reaction conditions:
(a) 2.0
equiv TBDMSCl, 4.0 equiv imidazole, in DMF, RT, 16 h, 95%; (b) 1.5
equiv 2,4,6-triisopropylbenzenesulfonyl chloride, 10.0 equiv NEt3, 0.12 equiv DMAP, in CH2Cl2, RT, 1
h, 60%; (c) 32% aqueous NH3, in THF, RT, 16 h, 95%; (d)
2.5 equiv acetic anhydride, in pyridine, 0°C to RT, 90 min, 97%;
(e) 1 M TBAF/0.5 M acetic acid, in THF, RT, 2.5 h, 100%; (f) 5.5 equiv
1,2,4-triazole, 5.0 equiv NEt3, 2.5 equiv 2-chlorophenyl
phosphorodichloridate, 4.0 equiv 1-methylimidazole in THF, RT, 1 h,
82%.For building block 17 (Scheme 2), our route began with the tetraisopropyldisiloxane
(TIPDS) 3′-
and 5′-protected guanosine derivative 8,[16] followed by protection of the exocyclic guanine
2-amino group using N,N-dimethylformamide
dimethyl acetal to furnish derivative 9 and protection
of the guanine lactam moiety with a O6-(4-nitrophenyl)ethyl group introduced under Mitsunobu conditions
to give 10. Then, triflation of the ribose 2′-OH
resulted in intermediate 11, which was converted into
the arabino nucleoside 12 in diastereoselective manner
by treatment with potassium trifluoroacetate and 18-crown-6-ether.
After triflation of the arabinose 2′-OH, compound 13 was reacted with lithium azide, producing key derivative 14 in high yields. Deprotection of the TIPDS moiety proceeded straightforward
using tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) and acetic acid. Finally,
derivative 15 was transformed into the dimethoxytritylated
compound 16, and conversion into the corresponding phosphodiester 17 was achieved in good yields by reaction with in situ generated
2-chlorophenyl chlorophosphorotriazolide in analogy to a general procedure
in the literature.[17] Starting with compound 8, our route provides 17 in a 5% overall yield
in nine steps with seven chromatographic purifications; in total,
0.5 g of 17 was obtained in the course of this study.
A recent report on the synthesis of 2′-methylselenoguanosine[18] suggested that protection of O6 could be omitted to shorthen the synthesis of 17; however, in our hands, we observed significant triflation
at O6 when the lactam moiety was unprotected.
For the incorporation
of the 2′-azido-modified nucleoside phosphodiester building
blocks 7 and 17 into RNA, we conducted strand
assembly by automated standard RNA solid-phase synthesis using 2′-O-TOM protected nucleoside phosphoramidites[19] up to the position of the intended azide modification.
The synthesis was interrupted after the detritylation step that liberated
the terminal 5′-hydroxyl group. Then, coupling of the phosphodiester
building block 7 or 17 was achieved manually
by activation with 1-(mesitylene-2-sulfonyl)-3-nitro-1,2,4-triazole
(MSNT)[20] in yields up to 95%. After capping,
strand elongation was continued by automated RNA phosphoramidite chemistry.
Up to an elongation of about 25 nucleotides we had no indication (from
inspection of oligonucleotide byproduct by LC–ESI mass spectrometry)
that the ribose 2′-azido group reacted with the phosphoramidite
moiety under the coupling conditions used. For deprotection, the oligoribonucleotides
containing 2′-azido groups were first treated with syn-2-pyridine aldoxime/tetramethylguanidine in dioxane/water
to cleave the 2-chlorophenyl phosphate protecting groups.[20] Then, standard deprotection conditions using
CH3NH2 in ethanol/water followed by treatment
with 1 M TBAF in THF were applied. We point out that the O6-(4-nitrophenyl)ethyl groups are stable during the first
deprotection step (CH3NH2 in ethanol/water)
but become cleaved during the second step of deprotection (TBAF in
THF) when fluorine anions induce β-elimination to release the
lactam moieties of the guanine nucleobases.[21−23] After purification
by anion-exchange HPLC (Supporting Figure 1), the expected molecular weights were confirmed for all RNAs by
LC–ESI mass spectrometry (Table 1, Supporting Figure 1).
Table 1
Selection of 2′-Azido Modified
RNAsa
molecular weight [amu]
sequence (5′→3′)
yield [nmol]
calcd
obsd
GGCN3UAGCC
90
2549.6
2550.0
GAAGGGCAACCN3UUCG
159
4838.9
4838.9
GGUCUCUGCCN3AAUAAGACATT
26
6678.1
6677.8
GGUCUCUGCN3CAAUAAGACATT
15
6678.1
6677.4
UGUCUUAUUGGCN3AGAGACCTdG
332
6697.1
6696.7
UGUCUUAUUGGCAGAGACCN3TdG
394
6697.1
6697.2
GGCUAGN3CC
110
2549.6
2549.6
UGUCUUAUUGN3GCAGAGACCTdG
90
6697.1
6696.5
UGUCUUAUUGGN3CAGAGACCTdG
42
6697.1
6696.5
UGUCUUAUUGGCAGN3AGACCTdG
10
6697.1
6696.6
C, 2′-N3 cytidine; G, 2′-N3 guanosine
C, 2′-N3 cytidine; G, 2′-N3 guanosine
Pairing Stability of 2′-Azido Modified RNA
Next,
we investigated the influence of the 2′-azido group on the
thermal stability of RNA double helices by temperature-dependent UV
spectroscopy (Supporting Figure 2). At
150 mM NaCl and 10 mM Na2HPO4 (pH 7.0), the
non-modified, self-complementary RNA 5′-GGCUAGCC-3′
melted at 62.2 ± 0.5 °C (cRNA = 16 μM), while the 2′-azido guanosine modified counterpart
5′-GGCUAGCC-3′
displayed a Tm value of 59.3 ± 0.5
°C (cRNA = 16 μM) (Supporting Figure 2A). This demonstrated that
the 2′-azido group causes a slight decrease in thermal stability,
about −1.4 °C per modification since the influence stems
from two isolated 2′-N3-G/C base
pairs (bp) within the palindromic duplex. A detailed determination
of the thermodynamic stabilities based on the concentration dependence
of their melting points[24] provided a ΔG° of −13.7 ± 0.3 kcal/mol for the unmodified
duplex and −13.3 ± 0.3 kcal/mol for the 2′-N3-G containing duplex (Supporting Figure
3). Additionally, we evaluated the influence on the thermal
stability of the corresponding 2′-azido cytidine nucleoside
and therefore compared the hairpin forming RNA 5′-GAAGGGCAACCUUCG
to its 2′-azido cytidine modified counterpart 5′-GAAGGGCAACCUUCG. While the non-modified
RNA melted at 71.7 ± 0.5 °C, the modified hairpin showed
a minimally increased Tm value of 72.3
± 0.5 °C (Supporting Figure 2C). As expected for a monomolecular melting transition, the melting
points did not change in response to varying concentration (cRNA = 2–32 μM). Shape analysis
of the melting curves[24] provided the thermodynamic
stabilities of a ΔG° of −6.6 ±
0.3 kcal/mol for the unmodified duplex and −6.5 ± 0.3
kcal/mol for the 2′-N3-C containing duplex (Supporting Figure 4).
CD and NMR Spectroscopic Analysis
We applied CD spectroscopy
to the duplex and hairpin systems, and the spectra clearly indicated
that the overall conformation of a typical A-form double helical architecture
was retained for the RNA double helices with 2′-azido-C or
2′-azido-G containing base pairs (Supporting
Figure 2B,D).The 1H NMR spectra of the duplex
and hairpin systems described above were recorded, and we observed
that the chemical shift as well as the line shape of the imino proton
resonances were again hardly affected by the modification (Figure 2). As these resonances reflect the integrity of
Watson–Crick base pairs, the 1H NMR data suggests
that 2′-azido-C or 2′-azido-G containing base pairs
are well tolerated within RNA double helices in aqueous buffer solution.
Figure 2
1H NMR imino proton spectra of 2′-azido-modified
oligoribonucleotides. (A) GGCUAGCC (top) and GGCUAGCC (bottom). (B) GAAGGGCAACCUUCG (top)
and GAAGGGCAACCUUCG
(bottom); conditions: cRNA = 0.1 mM, 25
mM Na2HAsO4, pH 7.0. C, 2′-N3 cytidine; G, 2′-N3 guanosine.
1H NMR imino proton spectra of 2′-azido-modified
oligoribonucleotides. (A) GGCUAGCC (top) and GGCUAGCC (bottom). (B) GAAGGGCAACCUUCG (top)
and GAAGGGCAACCUUCG
(bottom); conditions: cRNA = 0.1 mM, 25
mM Na2HAsO4, pH 7.0. C, 2′-N3 cytidine; G, 2′-N3 guanosine.
X-ray Analysis of a 2′-Azido Containing RNA
Encouraged by the NMR spectroscopic results, we set out for the X-ray
analysis of a 2′-azido modified RNA. We focused on the 27 nt
fragment of E. coli 23 S rRNA sarcin-ricin loop (SRL)
region[25,26] as a crystallization scaffold. The modification
of interest was placed in the double helical region of this scaffold
to obtain insights on the impact of a 2′-azido group within
an A-form RNA double helix. Analysis of the SRL structure (Protein
Data Bank [PDB] identification no. 483D) revealed that the 2′-OH groups
of U2650 and A2670 are not involved in crystal contacts and hence
should be available for modifications. Moreover, these two nucleotides
are forming a Watson–Crick base pair in a double helical region.
Three SRL sequences were therefore synthesized: an unmodified SRL
(used as a control for crystallization and diffraction) and two modified
sequences with the introduction of a 2′-azido group into U2650
or A2670 (Figure 3, Supporting
Figure 5 and Supporting Figure 6). Crystallization trials revealed
that both 2′-azido modified RNAs crystallized, providing crystals
diffracting to atomic resolution (Supporting Table
2). X-ray structure determinations showed that the azido groups
are well-defined in the electron density maps for both 2′-azido
modified RNAs (Figure 3). Superimpositions
of both azido-modified RNA structures with the unmodified RNA revealed
a root-mean-square deviation (rmsd) of 0.07 and 0.14 Å. These
values were within the errors on coordinates (0.13 and 0.11 Å),
thus showing that the 2′-azido group does not affect the RNA
structure (Figure 4). However, detailed analysis
of the RNA hydration pattern disclosed a displacement of several water
molecules from the RNA major groove in presence of the 2′-azido
group (Figure 4B,C). In addition, a water molecule
appears to be involved into an intraresidue U(O2)/water/2′-azido
interaction in the 2′-N3-U2650 structure (Figure 3B). These modifications of the RNA hydration shell
might be responsible for the slight changes in melting temperatures
compared to the unmodified RNA. Additionally, another possible contribution
of the decrease in thermal stability could also be a small, but significant,
influence of the azido group on the nucleobase polarization, as recently
postulated for a 2′-F-modified RNA.[27]
Figure 3
X-ray
structure of 2′-azido modified RNA at atomic resolution.
(A) E. coli Sarcin-ricin stem-loop (SRL) RNA used
for crystallization; secondary structure. (B) 2Fobs – Fcalc electron density
map showing the 2′-N3-U2650/A2670 base pair. Water
molecules are shown as red spheres. (C) 2Fobs – Fcalc electron density map
showing the U2650/2′-N3-A2670 base pair.
Figure 4
Structure comparison of 2′-azido modified and unmodified
SRL RNA. (A) Stereoview showing a superposition of unmodified (gray),
2′-N3-A2670 (red), and 2′-N3-U2650
(blue) RNA; arrows indicate positions of 2′-N3 groups.
(B, C) Detailed views (two different orientations) of the U2650-A2670
base pair and hydration in superposed RNA structures with and without
2′-N3 modification. A water molecule hydrogen-bonded
with 2′-OH and O2 of U2650 is shifted in the 2′-N3-U2650 SRL structure (green arrow).
X-ray
structure of 2′-azido modified RNA at atomic resolution.
(A) E. coli Sarcin-ricin stem-loop (SRL) RNA used
for crystallization; secondary structure. (B) 2Fobs – Fcalc electron density
map showing the 2′-N3-U2650/A2670 base pair. Water
molecules are shown as red spheres. (C) 2Fobs – Fcalc electron density map
showing the U2650/2′-N3-A2670 base pair.Structure comparison of 2′-azido modified and unmodified
SRL RNA. (A) Stereoview showing a superposition of unmodified (gray),
2′-N3-A2670 (red), and 2′-N3-U2650
(blue) RNA; arrows indicate positions of 2′-N3 groups.
(B, C) Detailed views (two different orientations) of the U2650-A2670
base pair and hydration in superposed RNA structures with and without
2′-N3 modification. A water molecule hydrogen-bonded
with 2′-OH and O2 of U2650 is shifted in the 2′-N3-U2650 SRL structure (green arrow).
RNA Interference of 2′-Azido Modified siRNA
We have recently pointed at the promising potential of 2′-azido
modified RNA for RNA interference, exemplified by using siRNA duplexes
with single and double 2′-azidouridine and/or 2′-azido
adenosine derivatizations.[13] Here, we expand
these investigations toward 2′-azido cytidine and 2′-azidoguanosine to further evaluate 2′-azido-modified oligoribonucleotides
for siRNA applications. For reasons of comparability, we employed
the same model system used previously to knock down the brain acid
soluble protein 1 (BASP1) encoding gene by transient siRNA nucleofection
in the chickenDF-1 cell line.[13,28] Expression of the BASP1 gene is specifically suppressed by Myc, an evolutionary
conserved oncoprotein;[29] conversely, the
BASP1 protein is an efficient inhibitor of Myc-induced
cell transformation.[28] First,
we synthesized six siRNA duplexes for the BASP1 target
gene with the sequence organization depicted in Figure 5A (see also Supporting Table 1),
three of them with a single 2′-azido-2′-deoxycytidine
and three of them with a single 2′-azido-2′-deoxyguanosine
modification, all of the modifications in either very close vicinity,
or directly at the cleavage site. The modified siRNAs caused significant
gene silencing as observed for the non-modified reference duplex (Figure 5B), with the highest remaining level of expression
of about 10% observed for “SIR Az-G14 as”. Remarkably,
the 2′-azido group is very well tolerated in the guide strand,
even when the site of modification is directly at the cleavage site
(positions 10, 11). As expected, the modification caused increased
nuclease resistance (Supporting Figure 7). Moreover, we compared the 2′-azido modified siRNAs to their
2′-fluoro and 2′-O-methyl counterparts
and found comparable silencing efficiencies (Figure 5C). Additionally, we mixed 2′-azido, 2′-fluoro
and 2′-O-methyl modifications up to a number
of seven within the antisense strand (Figure 5C). Some of these modified duplexes showed more reduced efficiencies
and remaining expression levels of about 25–35%, even for non-azido
siRNA species. Reduced efficiency was also observed for a siRNA type
with a total of two 2′-fluoro (positions 9, 11) and three 2′-O-methyl groups (positions 3, 7, 15). When we added two
2′-azido modifications to either positions 8 and 12 or 8 and
13, the expression levels were slightly increased, thereby less for
the first mentioned substitution pattern. In a further experiment,
we demonstrated that the level of suppression of these highly modified
siRNAs was dose-dependent (Supporting Figure 8). Moreover, time-course experiments showed a significant level of
suppression even after 2 days of incubation for the unmodified as
well as the highly modified siRNA duplexes, whereas after 9 days full
expression levels were reached again for all four duplexes tested
(Supporting Figure 9). Taken together,
our siRNA data demonstrates that the 2′-azido group represents
an interesting and powerful alternative that complements the existing
repertoire of 2′-modifications for siRNA applications.
Figure 5
Gene silencing
by 2′-azido modified siRNAs. (A) Sequence
of the brain acid soluble protein 1 (BASP1)[13,28] targeting siRNA duplex used in this study; nucleosides in red indicate
positions for 2′-azido modification tested. (B) Biological
activities of 2′-azido cytidine or 2′-azido guanosine
modified siRNAs. (C) Biological activities of 2′-OMe (green),
2′-F (blue), and 2′-N3 (red) modified siRNAs,
directed against BASP1 mRNA. Chicken DF-1 cells grown
on 60 mm dishes were transiently nucleofected with 0.12 nmol (∼1.5
μg) aliquots of unmodified (SIR) or modified siRNAs (SIR Az,
SIR OMe, SIR F) containing azido, methoxy, or fluoro groups at the
indicated nucleotides on sense (s) or antisense (as) strands. An equal
aliquot of siRNA with a shuffled (random) nucleotide sequence was
used as a control. Total RNAs were isolated 2 days after siRNA delivery,
and 5-μg aliquots were analyzed by Northern hybridization using
a DNA probe specific for the chicken BASP1 gene,
and subsequently a probe specific for the housekeeping quail GAPDH gene.[28] The levels (%)
of BASP1 expression were determined using a phosphorimager
and are depicted as bars relative to mock transfections (no SIR, 100%).
The electrophoretic positions of rRNAs are indicated in the margin.
All siRNAs depicted contain overhangs of 2′-deoxynucleosides
(lower case letters). SIR random: 5′-UCUGGGUCUAAGCCAAACAUT/5′-UGUUUGGCUUAGACCCAGAUdG.
Gene silencing
by 2′-azido modified siRNAs. (A) Sequence
of the brain acid soluble protein 1 (BASP1)[13,28] targeting siRNA duplex used in this study; nucleosides in red indicate
positions for 2′-azido modification tested. (B) Biological
activities of 2′-azido cytidine or 2′-azido guanosine
modified siRNAs. (C) Biological activities of 2′-OMe (green),
2′-F (blue), and 2′-N3 (red) modified siRNAs,
directed against BASP1 mRNA. ChickenDF-1 cells grown
on 60 mm dishes were transiently nucleofected with 0.12 nmol (∼1.5
μg) aliquots of unmodified (SIR) or modified siRNAs (SIR Az,
SIR OMe, SIR F) containing azido, methoxy, or fluoro groups at the
indicated nucleotides on sense (s) or antisense (as) strands. An equal
aliquot of siRNA with a shuffled (random) nucleotide sequence was
used as a control. Total RNAs were isolated 2 days after siRNA delivery,
and 5-μg aliquots were analyzed by Northern hybridization using
a DNA probe specific for the chickenBASP1 gene,
and subsequently a probe specific for the housekeeping quail GAPDH gene.[28] The levels (%)
of BASP1 expression were determined using a phosphorimager
and are depicted as bars relative to mock transfections (no SIR, 100%).
The electrophoretic positions of rRNAs are indicated in the margin.
All siRNAs depicted contain overhangs of 2′-deoxynucleosides
(lower case letters). SIR random: 5′-UCUGGGUCUAAGCCAAACAUT/5′-UGUUUGGCUUAGACCCAGAUdG.
Labeling of 2′-Azido RNA: Click Chemistry
To
further underline the high chemical flexibility of 2′-azido
modified RNA strands, we demonstrated their amenability to one of
the most widely used bioconjugation reaction, namely ,the azide–alkyne
1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction, commonly referred to as Click
chemistry.[11,12] We chose the copper-catalyzed version with
acetonitrile as cosolvent acting as ligand of the CuI complex,
thereby stabilizing the oxidation state.[30] Applying this setup, 2′-azido modified BASP1 siRNA at 1 mM concentration was efficiently reacted with a commercially
available, alkyne-modified 5-carboxytetramethylrhodamine dye (F545)
(2 mM) in the presence of sodium ascorbate and analyzed by anion exchange
chromatography (Figure 6A,B).
Figure 6
Internal labeling of
selectively 2′-azido modified RNAs
with a fluorescent dye (F545) using Click chemistry. (A) Reaction
scheme: (a) 5 mM CuSO4, 10 mM sodium ascorbate, 50 °C,
3 h; cRNA = 1 mM, cDye = 2 mM, H2O/CH3CN = 4/1; 60 μL
total reaction volume. (B) Reaction analysis of F545-alkyne and UGUCUUAUUGGCAGAGAC(C19)TdG followed
by anion exchange chromatography. (C) Activities of G11-, C12-, and
C19-labeled BASP1 siRNA and corresponding controls
(unmodified siRNA and siRNA with 3′-end F545-labeled sense
strand); for conditions see Figure 5. (D) BASP1 siRNA with internal (G11) 2′-azido-clicked
F545 dye at the antisense strand (bottom) and BASP1 control siRNA with standard 3′-end sense strand labeling
(top) show cytoplasmic localization in DF1 cells visualized by fluorescence
microscopy. The amounts of nucleofected siRNAs were 0.24 nmol (C)
or 0.48 nmol (D), respectively.
Internal labeling of
selectively 2′-azido modified RNAs
with a fluorescent dye (F545) using Click chemistry. (A) Reaction
scheme: (a) 5 mM CuSO4, 10 mM sodium ascorbate, 50 °C,
3 h; cRNA = 1 mM, cDye = 2 mM, H2O/CH3CN = 4/1; 60 μL
total reaction volume. (B) Reaction analysis of F545-alkyne and UGUCUUAUUGGCAGAGAC(C19)TdG followed
by anion exchange chromatography. (C) Activities of G11-, C12-, and
C19-labeled BASP1 siRNA and corresponding controls
(unmodified siRNA and siRNA with 3′-end F545-labeled sense
strand); for conditions see Figure 5. (D) BASP1 siRNA with internal (G11) 2′-azido-clicked
F545 dye at the antisense strand (bottom) and BASP1 control siRNA with standard 3′-end sense strand labeling
(top) show cytoplasmic localization in DF1 cells visualized by fluorescence
microscopy. The amounts of nucleofected siRNAs were 0.24 nmol (C)
or 0.48 nmol (D), respectively.While the siRNA labeled in standard fashion at
the 3′-end
of the sense strand was of the same activity compared
to the unmodified reference, siRNAs with the fluorophore attached
to the antisense strand at internal nucleoside positions
exhibited reduced activities (Figure 6C). The
latter is not unexpected due to the stringent structural requirements
for strand recognition within the RISC complex.[6] However, since a very recent study has reported on successful
examples of fluorescent labeling of the antisense strand,[31] we also evaluated our type of labeling for three
selected internal antisense positions. We observed significant but
reduced efficiencies for two of the corresponding siRNAs (C19, G11),
while the C12-labeled counterpart had less activity (Figure 6C). Nevertheless, the fluorescently labeled siRNAs
allowed their reliable localization within the chicken DF1 cells by
fluorescence microscopy (Figure 6D). Taken
together, this set of experiments demonstrates that the 2′-azido
group of our RNA derivatives can efficiently react under Click conditions
and is therefore open to the wide field of bioconjugation and applications.
Summary, Reflection, and Conclusion
This study reports
clear evidence of the accessibility of site-specifically 2′-azido
modified RNA with respect to all four standard nucleosides. Importantly,
the azido nucleosides, once incorporated into RNA by individual cycles
of phosphotriester chemistry, are compatible with subsequent strand
assembly using phosphoramidite chemistry. It is precisely this point
that has caused confusion in the recent literature with reports explicitely
claiming that phosphoramidite chemistry would not work in the presence
of azide functionalities.[14,32] On the basis of our
studies, we can confirm incompatibility only at the level of nucleosides,
as experienced by unsuccessful trials to synthesize 2′-azidonucleosidephosphoramidite building blocks; however, we and others
observed clear compatibility with strand elongation of azide containing
DNA[33,34] and RNA.[35] We
further consider that the combination of phosphotriester chemistry
for azido nucleoside building blocks and phosphoramidite chemistry
for strand elongation could, in principle, be replaced by a uniform
phosphonate strategy (see also ref (33)). Nevertheless, we believe that a combined approach
(as used here) is highly attractive due to the widespread use of phosphoramidite
chemistry in most synthetic nucleic acid laboratories, and therefore
one may expect a more rapid dissemination. We also mention that for
RNA targets carrying multiple azido groups a uniform phosphonate chemistry
is expected to be of higher efficiency due to straightforward synthesis
automatization.With the synthetic tool in hands to generate
2′-azido modified RNA at any of the four nucleosides, we were
able to study their structural features in detail. The crystal structure
revealed that the modification is very well tolerated and accommodated
in the minor groove, with the formation of water-bridged hydrogen
bonding networks to the azide. Compared to the structure of the unmodified
RNA, the spine of hydration is altered slightly, in a way that the
larger azide group replaces a water molecule. These minor structural
changes are in line with the hardly affected biophysical characteristics
obtained from CD and NMR spectroscopy. Also, the influence on thermodynamic
stabilites (analyzed by UV melting curve analysis) were rather small.To address the functional repertoire of 2′-azido modified
RNA, we explored two aspects, namely, siRNA applications and bioconjugation.
Concerning the first matter, the azide modification accounts for a
structurally non-perturbing alteration, such as 2′-OCH3 and 2′-F, and like these behaves in comparable manner
with respect to its performance in the siRNA system tested. In particular,
the 2′-azido group possesses the extraordinary property of
being well accepted in the guide (antisense) strand, while most other
modifications are much better tolerated in the passenger (sense) strand.[8,31,36−38] The 2′-azido
modification hence complements the existing set of ribose modifications
so far used in siRNA technologies, however, with the major advantage
that it brings in additional chemical reactivity. This reactivity
can be exploited for labeling of the RNA as exemplified here by introduction
of fluorescent dyes.So far, the use of the Click reaction for
RNA labeling has relied
predominantly on alkyne modified nucleic acids, while the labeling
partner was modified with an azide.[39−45] The feasibility of the present synthetic approach now opens reverse
attachment of the required functional groups, thereby increasing flexibility.
This will be of high significance for selective and internal nucleic
acid labeling with multiple dyes on the same RNA, as for example requested
by multicolor single-molecule FRET techniques[46] or for nucleic acid cyclization,[47] lariat
formation or branching.[48] The possibility
of reverse attachments will be of further interest in the emerging
field of RNA nanotechnologies.[49,50]The 2′-azido
modification accounts for the rare and exceptional
type of RNA modification that on the one hand is well accommodated
within the RNA, thereby leaving biological recognition processes in
cellular systems largely unhindered, and on the other hand confers
bioorthogonal reactivity to the system. Allocating this functional
group and its properties at the ribose 2′ position that is
equivalent in any of the four canonical nucleosides makes this modification
a highly reliable and flexible tool for RNA chemical biologists.
Methods
For the synthesis of 2′-azido building
blocks 7 and 17 and for solid-phase synthesis,
deprotection,
purification, and mass spectrometry of 2′-azido modified RNA,
see the Supporting Information.
X-ray Crystallography
The 27-nucleotide SRL hairpin
was crystallized as described.[25] This sequence
was chosen as a test case since crystallization conditions easily
produce well-diffracting crystals. Crystals were grown for 3 days
at 20 °C for unmodified SRL sequence, but 3 months were required
for 2′-N3-A2670-modified SRL and 1 year for 2′-N3-U2650-modified SRL. Crystals were cryoprotected for about
5 min in a reservoir solution containing 15% (v/v) of glycerol and
3.5 M ammonium sulfate and flash-frozen in liquid ethane for data
collection. The significant increase in time required for growing
crystals of both 2′-azido modified SRL sequences led to an
important non-merohedral crystal twinning that could be detected only
during X-ray diffraction (splitting of diffraction spots). Reasonably
good data could however be collected using the highly focused beam
of the X06SA beamline at the SLS synchrotron. Data were processed
with the XDS Package.[51] Structures were
refined with PHENIX.[52] A significant twinning
fraction (20.5%) was detected for 2′-N3-U2650-modified
SRL crystals. The structure was refined against twinned data using
PHENIX.
Click Labeling
For labeling, 2′-azido modified
RNA (60 nmol) was lyophilized in a 1 mL Eppendorf tube. Then, aqueous
solutions of F545 (Acetylene-Fluor 545, Click Chemistry Tools), CuSO4, and sodium ascorbate were added consecutively; acetonitrile
was added as cosolvent[30] to reach final
concentrations of 1 mM RNA, 2 mM dye, 5 mM CuSO4, 10 mM
sodium ascorbate, and a H2O/acetonitrile ratio of 4:1 in
a total reaction volume of 60 μL. The reaction mixture was degassed
and stirred for 3–4 h under argon atmosphere at 50 °C.
To monitor the reaction and to purify the reaction mixtures, anion
exchange HPLC was used as described in the Supporting
Information.
Authors: Thazha P Prakash; Charles R Allerson; Prasad Dande; Timothy A Vickers; Namir Sioufi; Russell Jarres; Brenda F Baker; Eric E Swayze; Richard H Griffey; Balkrishen Bhat Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2005-06-30 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Pirkko Muhonen; Tuula Tennilä; Elena Azhayeva; Ranga N Parthasarathy; Anthony J Janckila; H Kalervo Väänänen; Alex Azhayev; Tiina Laitala-Leinonen Journal: Chem Biodivers Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Feng Li; Pradeep S Pallan; Martin A Maier; Kallanthottathil G Rajeev; Steven L Mathieu; Christoph Kreutz; Yupeng Fan; Jayodita Sanghvi; Ronald Micura; Eriks Rozners; Muthiah Manoharan; Martin Egli Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2007-09-18 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Sarah Nainar; Samantha Beasley; Michael Fazio; Miles Kubota; Nan Dai; Ivan R Corrêa; Robert C Spitale Journal: Chembiochem Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 3.164