Literature DB >> 11802084

Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system.

David Feeny1, William Furlong, George W Torrance, Charles H Goldsmith, Zenglong Zhu, Sonja DePauw, Margaret Denton, Michael Boyle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) is a generic multiattribute preference-based measure of health status and health-related quality of life that is widely used as an outcome measure in clinical studies, in population health surveys, in the estimation of quality-adjusted life years, and in economic evaluations. HUI3 consists of eight attributes (or dimensions) of health status: vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, cognition, and pain with 5 or 6 levels per attribute, varying from highly impaired to normal.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives are to present a multiattribute utility function and eight single-attribute utility functions for the HUI3 system based on community preferences. STUDY
DESIGN: Two preference surveys were conducted. One, the modeling survey, collected preference scores for the estimation of the utility functions. The other, the direct survey, provided independent scores to assess the predictive validity of the utility functions. MEASURES: Preference measures included value scores obtained on the Feeling Thermometer and standard gamble utility scores obtained using the Chance Board. RESPONDENTS: A random sample of the general population (> or =16 years of age) in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
RESULTS: Estimates were obtained for eight single-attribute utility functions and an overall multiattribute utility function. The intraclass correlation coefficient between directly measured utility scores and scores generated by the multiattribute function for 73 health states was 0.88.
CONCLUSIONS: The HUI3 scoring function has strong theoretical and empirical foundations. It performs well in predicting directly measured scores. The HUI3 system provides a practical way to obtain utility scores based on community preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11802084     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200202000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  414 in total

1.  The effect of weight loss on changes in health-related quality of life among overweight and obese women with urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Angela Marinilli Pinto; Leslee L Subak; Sanae Nakagawa; Eric Vittinghoff; Rena R Wing; John W Kusek; William H Herman; Delia Smith West; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) demonstrated construct validity in a Nigerian population with hypertension.

Authors:  Obinna Ikechukwu Ekwunife; Cletus Nze Aguwa; Nneka Uchenna Igboeli
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Metabolic syndrome and quality of life in the elderly: age and gender differences.

Authors:  Alice Laudisio; Emanuele Marzetti; Livia Antonica; Francesco Pagano; Davide L Vetrano; Roberto Bernabei; Giuseppe Zuccalà
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 5.614

4.  Construct validity of the RAND-12 and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and 3 in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Sheri L Maddigan; David H Feeny; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Is the Health Utilities Index valid in total hip arthroplasty patients?

Authors:  Chris Blanchard; David Feeny; Jeffrey L Mahon; Robert Bourne; Cecil Rorabeck; Larry Stitt; Susan Webster-Bogaert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Estimation and comparison of derived preference scores from the SF-36 in lung transplant patients.

Authors:  Francis S Lobo; Cynthia R Gross; Barbara J Matthees
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Comparison of health state utility values derived using time trade-off, rank and discrete choice data anchored on the full health-dead scale.

Authors:  John Brazier; Donna Rowen; Yaling Yang; Aki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-09-30

8.  A comparison of the ICECAP-O with EQ-5D in a falls prevention clinical setting: are they complements or substitutes?

Authors:  Jennifer C Davis; Teresa Liu-Ambrose; Chris G Richardson; Stirling Bryan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Impact of impairment and secondary health conditions on health preference among Canadians with chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Catharine Craven; Sander L Hitzig; Nicole Mittmann
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Systematic Review of the Costs and Benefits of Prescribed Cannabis-Based Medicines for the Management of Chronic Illness: Lessons from Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Samuel Herzog; Marian Shanahan; Peter Grimison; Anh Tran; Nicole Wong; Nicholas Lintzeris; John Simes; Martin Stockler; Rachael L Morton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.