Literature DB >> 10871716

Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients.

P Taenzer1, B D Bultz, L E Carlson, M Speca, T DeGagne, K Olson, R Doll, Z Rosberger.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to determine if providing patient specific Quality of Life (QL) information to clinic staff before a clinic appointment improved patient care in a lung cancer outpatient clinic. Patients were sequentially assigned to either a usual care control group or the experimental group, which completed a computerized version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire in order to provide the clinic staff with QL information prior to the clinic appointment. The control group completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 paper version after the clinic appointment. Outcome measures were patient satisfaction, the degree to which issues identified on the QL questionnaire were addressed in the appointment, and a chart audit, which measured charting of QL issues and actions taken by the clincian relating to QL. In the experimental group, more QL issues identified by the patient on the EORTC QLQ-C30 were addressed during the clinic appointment than in the control group. As well, marginally more categories were charted and a trend towards more actions being taken was seen in the experimental group. Patients reported being equally and highly satisfied with the treatment in both groups. The clinical implication is that the computerized administration of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and providing staff with a report highlighting patient-specific QL deficits is a simple, time-effective and acceptable means of improving patient-provider communication in a busy outpatient clinic. Large trials studying its effectiveness in different patient populations and regions would further elucidate the nature of this effect and potentially improve the overall quality of care that patients receive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10871716     DOI: 10.1002/1099-1611(200005/06)9:3<203::aid-pon453>3.0.co;2-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  88 in total

1.  Oncologists' use of quality of life information: results of a survey of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group physicians.

Authors:  A Bezjak; P Ng; R Skeel; A D Depetrillo; R Comis; K M Taylor
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The impact of individual quality of life assessment on psychosocial attention in patients with chest malignancies: a randomized study.

Authors:  Mercedes Nicklasson; Magnus L Elfström; Jan Olofson; Bengt Bergman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Using the health utilities index in routine clinical care: process, feasibility, and acceptability: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Maria-Jose Santana; David H Feeny
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Information Needs of Men with Localized Prostate Cancer During Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Seth E Wolpin; Jason Parks; Mary Galligan; Kenneth J Russell; Donna L Berry
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 5.  [The benefits of using patient-reported outcomes in cancer treatment: an overview].

Authors:  Lisa M Wintner; Johannes M Giesinger; Georg Kemmler; Monika Sztankay; Anne Oberguggenberger; Eva-Maria Gamper; Barbara Sperner-Unterweger; Bernhard Holzner
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Issues in the design of Internet-based systems for collecting patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  James B Jones; Claire F Snyder; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Development of an online library of patient-reported outcome measures in gastroenterology: the GI-PRO database.

Authors:  Puja Khanna; Nikhil Agarwal; Dinesh Khanna; Ron D Hays; Lin Chang; Roger Bolus; Gil Melmed; Cynthia B Whitman; Robert M Kaplan; Rikke Ogawa; Bradley Snyder; Brennan Mr Spiegel
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  A randomized trial of weekly symptom telemonitoring in advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  Susan E Yount; Nan Rothrock; Michael Bass; Jennifer L Beaumont; Deborah Pach; Thomas Lad; Jyoti Patel; Maria Corona; Rebecca Weiland; Katherine Del Ciello; David Cella
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 9.  Renal cell carcinoma: risk assessment and prognostic factors for newly diagnosed patients.

Authors:  Tracy M Downs; Matthew Schultzel; Helen Shi; Catherine Sanders; Zunera Tahir; Georgia Robins Sadler
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 10.  Methods for improving the quality of palliative care delivery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brandyn D Lau; Rebecca A Aslakson; Renee F Wilson; Oluwakemi A Fawole; Colleen C Apostol; Kathryn A Martinez; Daniela Vollenweider; Eric B Bass; Sydney E Morss Dy
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.