Literature DB >> 22262427

Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data.

Ola Rolfson1, Alastair Rothwell, Art Sedrakyan, Kate Eresian Chenok, Eric Bohm, Kevin J Bozic, Göran Garellick.   

Abstract

There is increasing interest in measuring patient-reported outcomes as part of routine medical practice, particularly in fields like total joint replacement surgery, where pain relief, satisfaction, function, and health-related quality of life, as perceived by the patient, are primary outcomes. We review some well-known outcome instruments, measurement issues, and early experiences with large-scale collection of patient-reported outcome measures in joint registries. The patient-reported outcome measures are reviewed in the context of multidimensional outcome assessment that includes the traditional clinical outcome parameters as well as disease-specific and general patient-reported outcome measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22262427      PMCID: PMC3234657          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  28 in total

1.  Total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Poss
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Comparing the standard EQ-5D three-level system with a five-level version.

Authors:  Mathieu F Janssen; Erwin Birnie; Juanita A Haagsma; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.725

3.  An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry.

Authors:  A G Rothwell; G J Hooper; A Hobbs; C M Frampton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-03

4.  Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; A Carr; D Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-03

5.  Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study.

Authors:  O Rolfson; J Kärrholm; L E Dahlberg; G Garellick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-07

6.  Internet-based follow-up questionnaire for measuring patient-reported outcome after total hip replacement surgery-reliability and response rate.

Authors:  Ola Rolfson; Roger Salomonsson; Leif E Dahlberg; Göran Garellick
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.725

7.  Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients.

Authors:  C E H Scott; C R Howie; D MacDonald; L C Biant
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-09

8.  The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Mark C Callanan; Bryan Jarrett; Charles R Bragdon; David Zurakowski; Harry E Rubash; Andrew A Freiberg; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Rasch analysis of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): a statistical re-evaluation.

Authors:  J Comins; J Brodersen; M Krogsgaard; N Beyer
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 4.221

10.  Variables determining outcome in total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  O Rolfson; L E Dahlberg; J-A Nilsson; H Malchau; G Garellick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-02
View more
  29 in total

1.  The PROMIS Global Health Questionnaire Correlates With the QuickDASH in Patients With Upper Extremity Illness.

Authors:  Nicky Stoop; Mariano E Menendez; Jos J Mellema; David Ring
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-02-13

2.  Assessment of the Swedish EQ-5D experience-based value sets in a total hip replacement population.

Authors:  Szilárd Nemes; Kristina Burström; Niklas Zethraeus; Ted Eneqvist; Göran Garellick; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Evaluating quality of life outcomes following joint replacement: psychometric evaluation of a short form of the WHOQOL-Bref.

Authors:  Deborah L Snell; Richard J Siegert; Lois J Surgenor; Jennifer A Dunn; Gary J Hooper
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Technology assessment and cost-effectiveness in orthopedics: how to measure outcomes and deliver value in a constantly changing healthcare environment.

Authors:  Jeremy M Burnham; Fabien Meta; Vincent Lizzio; Eric C Makhni; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

Review 5.  Health policy implications of outcomes measurement in orthopaedics.

Authors:  John Philip Andrawis; Kate Eresian Chenok; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Improved statistical analysis of pre- and post-treatment patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): the applicability of piecewise linear regression splines.

Authors:  M E Greene; O Rolfson; G Garellick; M Gordon; S Nemes
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Joint replacement registries in the United States: a new paradigm.

Authors:  David C Ayers; Patricia D Franklin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Patient-Reported Outcomes: Understanding Surgical Efficacy and Quality from the Patient's Perspective.

Authors:  Jessica I Billig; Erika D Sears; Breanna N Travis; Jennifer F Waljee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in U.S. Total joint replacement registries: rationale, status, and plans.

Authors:  Patricia D Franklin; David Lewallen; Kevin Bozic; Brian Hallstrom; William Jiranek; David C Ayers
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Post-operative Oxford knee score can be used to indicate whether patient expectations have been achieved after primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  N D Clement; D MacDonald; J T Patton; R Burnett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.