Literature DB >> 18028282

Rasch analysis of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): a statistical re-evaluation.

J Comins1, J Brodersen, M Krogsgaard, N Beyer.   

Abstract

The knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), is widely used to evaluate subjective outcome in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructed patients. However, the validity of KOOS has not been assessed using Rasch analysis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the viability of KOOS as an outcome measure for ACL reconstruction using the partial credit Rasch model. Rasch analysis was applied to 200 KOOS questionnaires completed by patients consecutively tested 20 weeks after ACL reconstruction and subsequent rehabilitation. Rasch analysis showed that of the five proposed subscales in KOOS, only knee-related quality of life (QoL) and sport and recreational related function (Sport/Rec) fulfilled the criteria of a unidimensional measurement scale when applied to these patients. The three subdomains in KOOS extracted from WOMAC did not fulfill these criteria. While the content of KOOS appears to be relevant for knee patients, the psychometric measurement properties of KOOS are insufficient for use on patients 20 weeks subsequent to ACL reconstruction. A new knee measure targeted for these patients could be developed based on the content of KOOS. This study demonstrates that knee measurement instruments constructed for a specific condition cannot necessarily be used on patients with other similar conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18028282     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2007.00724.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0905-7188            Impact factor:   4.221


  13 in total

Review 1.  Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data.

Authors:  Ola Rolfson; Alastair Rothwell; Art Sedrakyan; Kate Eresian Chenok; Eric Bohm; Kevin J Bozic; Göran Garellick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Different knee joint loading patterns in ACL deficient copers and non-copers during walking.

Authors:  Tine Alkjær; Marius Henriksen; Erik B Simonsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Associations between inadequate knee function detected by KOOS and prospective graft failure in an anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee.

Authors:  Lars-Petter Granan; Valborg Baste; Lars Engebretsen; Maria C S Inacio
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Quadriceps Neuromuscular and Physical Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hunnicutt; Michelle M McLeod; Harris S Slone; Chris M Gregory
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  KNEES-ACL has superior responsiveness compared to the most commonly used patient-reported outcome measures for anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Jonathan David Comins; Volkert Dirk Siersma; Martin Lind; Bent Wulff Jakobsen; Michael Rindom Krogsgaard
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS).

Authors:  Natalie J Collins; Devyani Misra; David T Felson; Kay M Crossley; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.794

7.  Iliotibial band autograft versus bone-patella-tendon-bone autograft, a possible alternative for ACL reconstruction: a 15-year prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Frederik Stensbirk; Kristian Thorborg; Lars Konradsen; Uffe Jørgensen; Per Hölmich
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  A scientific approach to optimal treatment of cruciate ligament injuries.

Authors:  M R Krogsgaard; J Brodersen; J Comins
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  ICRS Recommendation Document: Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients with Articular Cartilage Defects.

Authors:  Ewa M Roos; Luella Engelhart; Jonas Ranstam; Allen F Anderson; Jay J Irrgang; Robert G Marx; Yelverton Tegner; Aileen M Davis
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury scale: validation of the Norwegian language version.

Authors:  Anne Gro Heyn Faleide; Eivind Inderhaug; Willemijn Vervaat; Kyrre Breivik; Bård Erik Bogen; Ingunn Fleten Mo; Ingrid Trøan; Torbjørn Strand; Liv Heide Magnussen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.