Literature DB >> 28421386

Technology assessment and cost-effectiveness in orthopedics: how to measure outcomes and deliver value in a constantly changing healthcare environment.

Jeremy M Burnham1, Fabien Meta2, Vincent Lizzio2, Eric C Makhni2, Kevin J Bozic3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this study is to review the basic concepts of healthcare value, patient outcome measurement, and cost-effectiveness analyses as they relate to the introduction of new surgical techniques and technologies in the field of orthopedic surgery. RECENT
FINDINGS: An increased focus on financial stewardship in healthcare has resulted in a plethora of cost-effectiveness and patient outcome research. Recent research has made great progress in identifying orthopedic technologies that provide exceptional value and those that do not meet adequate standards for widespread adoption. As the pace of technological innovation advances in lockstep with an increased focus on value, orthopedic surgeons will need to have a working knowledge of value-based healthcare decision-making. Value-based healthcare and cost-effectiveness analyses can aid orthopedic surgeons in making ethical and fiscally responsible treatment choices for their patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-effectiveness; Healthcare; Patient-reported outcomes; Technology assessment; Time-driven activity-based cost identification; Value

Year:  2017        PMID: 28421386      PMCID: PMC5435638          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-017-9407-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  30 in total

1.  Understanding Time-driven Activity-based Costing.

Authors:  Alok D Sharan; Gregory D Schroeder; Michael E West; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 2.  Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality.

Authors:  Ann Bowling
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 2.341

3.  Management of End-Stage Ankle Arthritis: Cost-Utility Analysis Using Direct and Indirect Costs.

Authors:  Benedict U Nwachukwu; Alexander S McLawhorn; Matthew S Simon; Kamran S Hamid; Constantine A Demetracopoulos; Jonathan T Deland; Scott J Ellis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Current status of cost utility analyses in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benedict U Nwachukwu; Kevin J Bozic; William W Schairer; Jaime L Bernstein; David S Jevsevar; Robert G Marx; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing for Surgical Episodes.

Authors:  Peter A Najjar; Matt Strickland; Robert S Kaplan
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Trends in orthopedics: an analysis of Medicare claims, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Daniel A Belatti; Phinit Phisitkul
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.390

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of the diagnosis of meniscus tears.

Authors:  Richard C Mather; William E Garrett; Brian J Cole; Kristen Hussey; Michael P Bolognesi; Tally Lassiter; Lori A Orlando
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 8.  Patient-reported outcome measures for the knee.

Authors:  Dean Wang; Morgan H Jones; Mahmoud M Khair; Anthony Miniaci
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Barriers to completion of Patient Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Schamber; Steven K Takemoto; Kate Eresian Chenok; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Collecting Patient-Reported Outcomes: Lessons from the California Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Kate Chenok; Stephanie Teleki; Nelson F SooHoo; James Huddleston; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2015-12-16
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Modifying MSC Phenotype to Facilitate Bone Healing: Biological Approaches.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman; Tzuhua Lin
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-24

2.  The Remote Completion Rate of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Forms Before Scheduled Clinic Visits-A Proof-of-Concept Study Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Computer Adaptive Test Questionnaires.

Authors:  Peter A Borowsky; Omar M Kadri; Jason E Meldau; Jacob Blanchett; Eric C Makhni
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2019-10-02

3.  Advances and innovations in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andreas Fontalis; Jean-Alain Epinette; Martin Thaler; Luigi Zagra; Vikas Khanduja; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2021-04-12

4.  Visual Analog Pain Scores Reported to a Nurse and a Physician in a Postoperative Setting.

Authors:  Trevor J McBride; Aaron Wilke; Jamie Chisholm; Kevin D Martin
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2020-09-24

5.  In-hospital Enrollment Into an Electronic Patient Portal Results in Improved Follow-up After Orthopedic Surgery: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Abhiram R Bhashyam; Mira Bansal; Madeline M McGovern; Quirine M J van der Vliet; Marilyn Heng
Journal:  JMIR Perioper Med       Date:  2022-08-11

6.  Factors Influencing Press Ganey Ambulatory Surgery Scores in Patients Undergoing Upper Extremity Procedures.

Authors:  Tristan B Weir; Tina Zhang; Julio J Jauregui; Ali Aneizi; Patrick M J Sajak; Matheus B Schneider; Mohit N Gilotra; Joshua M Abzug; R Frank Henn; Ngozi M Akabudike
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2021-06-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.