Literature DB >> 24488224

Post-operative Oxford knee score can be used to indicate whether patient expectations have been achieved after primary total knee arthroplasty.

N D Clement1, D MacDonald, J T Patton, R Burnett.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify threshold values in the post-operative Oxford knee score (OKS) and change in the score for achievement of specific patient expectations and satisfaction, and whether failure to meet specific patient expectations influenced the rate of satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS: Prospectively complied data for 322 primary TKA were used. Patient demographics, and pre- and post-operative (1 year) OKS, and expectation fulfilment were collected. Patient satisfaction was also assessed 1 year post-operatively.
RESULTS: Patient pre-operative expectations varied in prevalence and differed according to gender, age, and severity of knee symptoms according the OKS. Fulfilment of patient expectations was variable and was dependent upon the specific expectation; the majority of patients achieved their expectation of pain relief and improved ability to walk (>70%), however, few fulfilled their expectation to kneel or squat (<25%). The threshold according to the post-operative OKS at which these expectations were achieved varied by more than ten points, ranging from ≥31 for pain relief to ≥42 for kneeling. Failure to fulfil patient expectations, for 15 of the 17 assessed, significantly increased the risk of dissatisfaction at 1 year (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The post-operative OKS can be used to predict the point at which the greatest proportion of patient expectations is achieved. Some expectations, however, are rarely fulfilled after a TKA and patients should be made aware of this pre-operatively which may improve their satisfaction post-operatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24488224     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2865-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  28 in total

1.  Predicting the cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacement: a health economic analysis.

Authors:  P J Jenkins; N D Clement; D F Hamilton; P Gaston; J T Patton; C R Howie
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Patient expectations of arthroplasty of the hip and knee.

Authors:  C E H Scott; K E Bugler; N D Clement; D MacDonald; C R Howie; L C Biant
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-07

3.  Patient expectations of total knee replacement and their association with sociodemographic factors and functional status.

Authors:  J H Yoo; C B Chang; Y G Kang; S J Kim; S C Seong; T K Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-03

4.  Patients' expectations of knee surgery.

Authors:  C A Mancuso; T P Sculco; T L Wickiewicz; E C Jones; L Robbins; R F Warren; P Williams-Russo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients.

Authors:  C E H Scott; C R Howie; D MacDonald; L C Biant
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-09

6.  The effect of surgical factors on early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) following total knee replacement.

Authors:  P N Baker; D J Deehan; D Lees; S Jameson; P J Avery; P J Gregg; M R Reed
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-08

7.  Functional capacity and actual daily activity do not contribute to patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maaike M Vissers; Ingrid B de Groot; Max Reijman; Johannes B Bussmann; Henk J Stam; Jan An Verhaar
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; Bert M Chesworth; Aileen M Davis; Nizar N Mahomed; Kory D J Charron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Randomized trials to modify patients' preoperative expectations of hip and knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Carol A Mancuso; Suzanne Graziano; Lisa M Briskie; Margaret G E Peterson; Paul M Pellicci; Eduardo A Salvati; Thomas P Sculco
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Preoperative function and gender predict pattern of functional recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Deborah M Kennedy; Steven E Hanna; Paul W Stratford; Jean Wessel; Jeffrey D Gollish
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  12 in total

1.  Symptom importance, patient expectations, and satisfaction in chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Jose L Mattos; Luke Rudmik; Rodney J Schlosser; Timothy L Smith; Jess C Mace; Jeremiah Alt; Zachary M Soler
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.858

2.  Patients' expectations about total knee arthroplasty outcomes.

Authors:  Sofia de Achaval; Michael A Kallen; Benjamin Amick; Glenn Landon; Sherwin Siff; David Edelstein; Hong Zhang; Maria E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  [Objectifying results in total knee arthroplasty: Is "patient satisfaction" adequate].

Authors:  C Kopkow; J Schmitt; E Haase; T Lange; K-P Günther; J Lützner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Characterizing patients' expectations in hip and knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Frederique J Hafkamp; Paul Lodder; Jolanda de Vries; Taco Gosens; Brenda L den Oudsten
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Single-stage total knee arthroplasty and osteotomy as treatment of secondary osteoarthritis with severe coronal deviation of joint surface due to extra-articular deformity.

Authors:  Ewout S Veltman; Remco J A van Wensen; Koen C Defoort; Gijs G van Hellemondt; Ate B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Validation of the Chinese (Mandarin) Version of the Oxford Knee Score in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Liangxiao Bao; Jian Wang; Kimie Fujita; Kiyoko Makimoto; Xiaoyan Liao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Longer hospital stay, more complications, and increased mortality but substantially improved function after knee replacement in older patients.

Authors:  Julian F Maempel; Fraser Riddoch; Neville Calleja; Ivan J Brenkel
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Musculoskeletal Multibody Simulation Analysis on the Impact of Patellar Component Design and Positioning on Joint Dynamics after Unconstrained Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maeruan Kebbach; Martin Darowski; Sven Krueger; Christoph Schilling; Thomas M Grupp; Rainer Bader; Andreas Geier
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 9.  Kneeling ability after total knee replacement.

Authors:  Vikki Wylde; Neil Artz; Nick Howells; Ashley W Blom
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2019-07-07

Review 10.  The effect of expectation on satisfaction in total knee replacements: a systematic review.

Authors:  Timothy Barlow; Tamsyn Clark; Mark Dunbar; Andrew Metcalfe; Damian Griffin
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.