N D Clement1, D MacDonald, J T Patton, R Burnett. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK, nickclement@doctors.org.uk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify threshold values in the post-operative Oxford knee score (OKS) and change in the score for achievement of specific patient expectations and satisfaction, and whether failure to meet specific patient expectations influenced the rate of satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Prospectively complied data for 322 primary TKA were used. Patient demographics, and pre- and post-operative (1 year) OKS, and expectation fulfilment were collected. Patient satisfaction was also assessed 1 year post-operatively. RESULTS: Patient pre-operative expectations varied in prevalence and differed according to gender, age, and severity of knee symptoms according the OKS. Fulfilment of patient expectations was variable and was dependent upon the specific expectation; the majority of patients achieved their expectation of pain relief and improved ability to walk (>70%), however, few fulfilled their expectation to kneel or squat (<25%). The threshold according to the post-operative OKS at which these expectations were achieved varied by more than ten points, ranging from ≥31 for pain relief to ≥42 for kneeling. Failure to fulfil patient expectations, for 15 of the 17 assessed, significantly increased the risk of dissatisfaction at 1 year (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The post-operative OKS can be used to predict the point at which the greatest proportion of patient expectations is achieved. Some expectations, however, are rarely fulfilled after a TKA and patients should be made aware of this pre-operatively which may improve their satisfaction post-operatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, Level III.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify threshold values in the post-operative Oxford knee score (OKS) and change in the score for achievement of specific patient expectations and satisfaction, and whether failure to meet specific patient expectations influenced the rate of satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Prospectively complied data for 322 primary TKA were used. Patient demographics, and pre- and post-operative (1 year) OKS, and expectation fulfilment were collected. Patient satisfaction was also assessed 1 year post-operatively. RESULTS:Patient pre-operative expectations varied in prevalence and differed according to gender, age, and severity of knee symptoms according the OKS. Fulfilment of patient expectations was variable and was dependent upon the specific expectation; the majority of patients achieved their expectation of pain relief and improved ability to walk (>70%), however, few fulfilled their expectation to kneel or squat (<25%). The threshold according to the post-operative OKS at which these expectations were achieved varied by more than ten points, ranging from ≥31 for pain relief to ≥42 for kneeling. Failure to fulfil patient expectations, for 15 of the 17 assessed, significantly increased the risk of dissatisfaction at 1 year (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The post-operative OKS can be used to predict the point at which the greatest proportion of patient expectations is achieved. Some expectations, however, are rarely fulfilled after a TKA and patients should be made aware of this pre-operatively which may improve their satisfaction post-operatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, Level III.
Authors: C A Mancuso; T P Sculco; T L Wickiewicz; E C Jones; L Robbins; R F Warren; P Williams-Russo Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Maaike M Vissers; Ingrid B de Groot; Max Reijman; Johannes B Bussmann; Henk J Stam; Jan An Verhaar Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Robert B Bourne; Bert M Chesworth; Aileen M Davis; Nizar N Mahomed; Kory D J Charron Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Carol A Mancuso; Suzanne Graziano; Lisa M Briskie; Margaret G E Peterson; Paul M Pellicci; Eduardo A Salvati; Thomas P Sculco Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2008-01-10 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Deborah M Kennedy; Steven E Hanna; Paul W Stratford; Jean Wessel; Jeffrey D Gollish Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Jose L Mattos; Luke Rudmik; Rodney J Schlosser; Timothy L Smith; Jess C Mace; Jeremiah Alt; Zachary M Soler Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Sofia de Achaval; Michael A Kallen; Benjamin Amick; Glenn Landon; Sherwin Siff; David Edelstein; Hong Zhang; Maria E Suarez-Almazor Journal: Health Expect Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Frederique J Hafkamp; Paul Lodder; Jolanda de Vries; Taco Gosens; Brenda L den Oudsten Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Ewout S Veltman; Remco J A van Wensen; Koen C Defoort; Gijs G van Hellemondt; Ate B Wymenga Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-12-12 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Maeruan Kebbach; Martin Darowski; Sven Krueger; Christoph Schilling; Thomas M Grupp; Rainer Bader; Andreas Geier Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 3.623