Literature DB >> 25232081

Joint replacement registries in the United States: a new paradigm.

David C Ayers1, Patricia D Franklin2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25232081      PMCID： PMC4159967          DOI： 10.2106/JBJS.N.00641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN： 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data.

Authors:  Ola Rolfson; Alastair Rothwell; Art Sedrakyan; Kate Eresian Chenok; Eric Bohm; Kevin J Bozic; Göran Garellick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Beyond joint implant registries: a patient-centered research consortium for comparative effectiveness in total joint replacement.

Authors:  Patricia D Franklin; Jeroan J Allison; David C Ayers
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores.

Authors:  D W Murray; R Fitzpatrick; K Rogers; H Pandit; D J Beard; A J Carr; J Dawson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-08

4.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

Authors:  N Bellamy; W W Buchanan; C H Goldsmith; J Campbell; L W Stitt
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in U.S. Total joint replacement registries: rationale, status, and plans.

Authors:  Patricia D Franklin; David Lewallen; Kevin Bozic; Brian Hallstrom; William Jiranek; David C Ayers
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Ke Zhao; Michael Kelly; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ewa M Roos; L Stefan Lohmander
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Anna K Nilsdotter; L Stefan Lohmander; Maria Klässbo; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 2.362
  8 in total
  11 in total

1.  Can an Arthroplasty Registry Help Decrease Transfusions in Primary Total Joint Replacement? A Quality Initiative.

Authors:  David C Markel; Mark W Allen; Nicole M Zappa
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Functional Gain and Pain Relief After Total Joint Replacement According to Obesity Status.

Authors:  Wenjun Li; David C Ayers; Courtland G Lewis; Thomas R Bowen; Jeroan J Allison; Patricia D Franklin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Validation of the HOOS, JR: A Short-form Hip Replacement Survey.

Authors:  Stephen Lyman; Yuo-Yu Lee; Patricia D Franklin; Wenjun Li; David J Mayman; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Trends in revision hip and knee arthroplasty observations after implementation of a regional joint replacement registry.

Authors:  Jas Singh; Angelos Politis; Lynda Loucks; David R Hedden; Eric R Bohm
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Do Aggregate Socioeconomic Status Factors Predict Outcomes for Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Rural Population?

Authors:  Benjamin J Keeney; Karl M Koenig; Nicholas G Paddock; Wayne E Moschetti; Michael B Sparks; David S Jevsevar
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Short term patient outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: Does the implant matter?

Authors:  Ilda B Molloy; Benjamin J Keeney; Michael B Sparks; Nicholas G Paddock; Karl M Koenig; Wayne E Moschetti; David S Jevsevar
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Resident Participation is Not Associated With Worse Outcomes After TKA.

Authors:  Mike H Bao; Benjamin J Keeney; Wayne E Moschetti; Nicholas G Paddock; David S Jevsevar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Trends in hip replacements between 1999 and 2012 in Sweden.

Authors:  Peter Cnudde; Szilard Nemes; Erik Bülow; John Timperley; Henrik Malchau; Johan Kärrholm; Göran Garellick; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Establishing minimum clinically important difference values for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Man Hung; Jerry Bounsanga; Maren W Voss; Charles L Saltzman
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-18

10.  Arthrodesis of the Foot or Ankle in Adult Patients with Congenital Clubfoot.

Authors:  Thompson Zhuang; Ghida El-Banna; Steve Frick
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-12-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.