S M Mantila Roosa1, A L Hurd, H Xu, R K Fuchs, S J Warden. 1. Center for Translational Musculoskeletal Research, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The proximal humerus is a common site for osteoporotic fracture. The current study demonstrates the rate of age-related decline in proximal humerus bone health. The data suggest aging is associated with considerable loss of bone mass, structural deterioration and reduced bone strength at the proximal humerus. INTRODUCTION: The proximal humerus is relatively under investigated despite being the fourth most common site for osteoporotic fracture. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed to assess age-related changes in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) properties of the proximal humerus in a cohort of 170 healthy, white males. RESULTS: Regression models estimated considerable age-related loss of DXA measured bone quantity at the proximal humerus, with areal bone mineral density modeled to decline by 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.5-35.0%) in the 50 years between ages 30 and 80 years (p < 0.001). pQCT measures indicated aging was associated with progressive periosteal and endosteal expansion, with the later occurring more rapidly as indicated by age-related declines in cortical bone mass, area and thickness (all p < 0.01). The net result of the density, mass and structural changes was a 26% (95% CI, 13.5-38.0%) decline in pQCT estimated proximal humerus bone strength in the 50 years between ages 30 and 80 years (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Aging is associated with considerable declines in proximal humeral bone health which, when coupled with a traumatic event such as a fall, may contribute to osteoporotic fracture at this site.
UNLABELLED: The proximal humerus is a common site for osteoporotic fracture. The current study demonstrates the rate of age-related decline in proximal humerus bone health. The data suggest aging is associated with considerable loss of bone mass, structural deterioration and reduced bone strength at the proximal humerus. INTRODUCTION: The proximal humerus is relatively under investigated despite being the fourth most common site for osteoporotic fracture. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed to assess age-related changes in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) properties of the proximal humerus in a cohort of 170 healthy, white males. RESULTS: Regression models estimated considerable age-related loss of DXA measured bone quantity at the proximal humerus, with areal bone mineral density modeled to decline by 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.5-35.0%) in the 50 years between ages 30 and 80 years (p < 0.001). pQCT measures indicated aging was associated with progressive periosteal and endosteal expansion, with the later occurring more rapidly as indicated by age-related declines in cortical bone mass, area and thickness (all p < 0.01). The net result of the density, mass and structural changes was a 26% (95% CI, 13.5-38.0%) decline in pQCT estimated proximal humerus bone strength in the 50 years between ages 30 and 80 years (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Aging is associated with considerable declines in proximal humeral bone health which, when coupled with a traumatic event such as a fall, may contribute to osteoporotic fracture at this site.
Authors: Emilio Calvo; Diana Morcillo; Antonio M Foruria; Enrique Redondo-Santamaría; Fernando Osorio-Picorne; Jose R Caeiro Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2010-12-31 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Stuart J Warden; Sara M Mantila Roosa; Mariana E Kersh; Andrea L Hurd; Glenn S Fleisig; Marcus G Pandy; Robyn K Fuchs Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Stuart J Warden; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Keith G Avin; Mariana E Kersh; Robyn K Fuchs; Roland Krug; Ryan J Bice Journal: Bone Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Christian Spross; Nicola Kaestle; Emanuel Benninger; Jürgen Fornaro; Johannes Erhardt; Vilijam Zdravkovic; Bernhard Jost Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-04-25 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Valentin Neuhaus; Christiaan H J Swellengrebel; Jeroen K J Bossen; David Ring Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: J W A M den Teuling; B S Pauwels; L Janssen; C E Wyers; H M J Janzing; J P W van den Bergh; J W Morrenhof Journal: Bone Joint Res Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 5.853
Authors: Agnieszka Tomczyk-Warunek; Tomasz Blicharski; Jaromir Jarecki; Piotr Dobrowolski; Siemowit Muszyński; Ewa Tomaszewska; Lucio C Rovati Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-02-24 Impact factor: 3.240