Literature DB >> 24706816

Physical activity when young provides lifelong benefits to cortical bone size and strength in men.

Stuart J Warden1, Sara M Mantila Roosa, Mariana E Kersh, Andrea L Hurd, Glenn S Fleisig, Marcus G Pandy, Robyn K Fuchs.   

Abstract

The skeleton shows greatest plasticity to physical activity-related mechanical loads during youth but is more at risk for failure during aging. Do the skeletal benefits of physical activity during youth persist with aging? To address this question, we used a uniquely controlled cross-sectional study design in which we compared the throwing-to-nonthrowing arm differences in humeral diaphysis bone properties in professional baseball players at different stages of their careers (n = 103) with dominant-to-nondominant arm differences in controls (n = 94). Throwing-related physical activity introduced extreme loading to the humeral diaphysis and nearly doubled its strength. Once throwing activities ceased, the cortical bone mass, area, and thickness benefits of physical activity during youth were gradually lost because of greater medullary expansion and cortical trabecularization. However, half of the bone size (total cross-sectional area) and one-third of the bone strength (polar moment of inertia) benefits of throwing-related physical activity during youth were maintained lifelong. In players who continued throwing during aging, some cortical bone mass and more strength benefits of the physical activity during youth were maintained as a result of less medullary expansion and cortical trabecularization. These data indicate that the old adage of "use it or lose it" is not entirely applicable to the skeleton and that physical activity during youth should be encouraged for lifelong bone health, with the focus being optimization of bone size and strength rather than the current paradigm of increasing mass. The data also indicate that physical activity should be encouraged during aging to reduce skeletal structural decay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  exercise; intracortical remodeling; osteoporosis; peak bone mass

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24706816      PMCID: PMC3986122          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1321605111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  38 in total

1.  Good maintenance of exercise-induced bone gain with decreased training of female tennis and squash players: a prospective 5-year follow-up study of young and old starters and controls.

Authors:  S Kontulainen; P Kannus; H Haapasalo; H Sievänen; M Pasanen; A Heinonen; P Oja; I Vuori
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Mechanical loading of diaphyseal bone in vivo: the strain threshold for an osteogenic response varies with location.

Authors:  Y F Hsieh; A G Robling; W T Ambrosius; D B Burr; C H Turner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  The effect of mechanical loading on the size and shape of bone in pre-, peri-, and postpubertal girls: a study in tennis players.

Authors:  S L Bass; L Saxon; R M Daly; C H Turner; A G Robling; E Seeman; S Stuckey
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Former college artistic gymnasts maintain higher BMD: a nine-year follow-up.

Authors:  N K Pollock; E M Laing; C M Modlesky; P J O'Connor; R D Lewis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Analysis of the pitching arm of the professional baseball pitcher.

Authors:  J W King; H J Brelsford; H S Tullos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1969 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Musculoskeletal model of the upper limb based on the visible human male dataset.

Authors:  B A Garner; M G Pandy
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.763

7.  Exercise during growth and bone mineral density and fractures in old age.

Authors:  M K Karlsson; C Linden; C Karlsson; O Johnell; K Obrant; E Seeman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-02-05       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Bone loss and bone size after menopause.

Authors:  Henrik G Ahlborg; Olof Johnell; Charles H Turner; Gunnar Rannevik; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Humeral hypertrophy in response to exercise.

Authors:  H H Jones; J D Priest; W C Hayes; C C Tichenor; D A Nagel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study.

Authors:  S L Hui; C W Slemenda; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  61 in total

1.  Focal enhancement of the skeleton to exercise correlates with responsivity of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells rather than peak external forces.

Authors:  Ian J Wallace; Gabriel M Pagnotti; Jasper Rubin-Sigler; Matthew Naeher; Lynn E Copes; Stefan Judex; Clinton T Rubin; Brigitte Demes
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  Bone Homeostasis and Repair: Forced Into Shape.

Authors:  Alesha B Castillo; Philipp Leucht
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Gradual decline in mobility with the adoption of food production in Europe.

Authors:  Christopher B Ruff; Brigitte Holt; Markku Niskanen; Vladimir Sladek; Margit Berner; Evan Garofalo; Heather M Garvin; Martin Hora; Juho-Antti Junno; Eliska Schuplerova; Rosa Vilkama; Erin Whittey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Aging and the muscle-bone relationship.

Authors:  Susan A Novotny; Gordon L Warren; Mark W Hamrick
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-01

5.  Computed tomography shows high fracture prevalence among physically active forager-horticulturalists with high fertility.

Authors:  Jonathan Stieglitz; Benjamin C Trumble; Caleb E Finch; Dong Li; Matthew J Budoff; Hillard Kaplan; Michael D Gurven
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Actin up in the Nucleus: Regulation of Actin Structures Modulates Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation.

Authors:  Janet Rubin; Buer Sen
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2017

Review 7.  In vivo Visualisation and Quantification of Bone Resorption and Bone Formation from Time-Lapse Imaging.

Authors:  Patrik Christen; Ralph Müller
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Meagre effects of disuse on the human fibula are not explained by bone size or geometry.

Authors:  A Ireland; R F Capozza; G R Cointry; L Nocciolino; J L Ferretti; J Rittweger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Associations between exercise, bone mineral density, and body composition in adolescents with anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Jason M Nagata; Jennifer L Carlson; Neville H Golden; Stuart B Murray; Jin Long; Mary B Leonard; Rebecka Peebles
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.652

10.  External bone size identifies different strength-decline trajectories for the male human femora.

Authors:  Morgan W Bolger; Genevieve E Romanowicz; Erin M R Bigelow; Ferrous S Ward; Antonio Ciarelli; Karl J Jepsen; David H Kohn
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.