Literature DB >> 21195633

Nondisplaced proximal humeral fractures: high incidence among outpatient-treated osteoporotic fractures and severe impact on upper extremity function and patient subjective health perception.

Emilio Calvo1, Diana Morcillo, Antonio M Foruria, Enrique Redondo-Santamaría, Fernando Osorio-Picorne, Jose R Caeiro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although most proximal humeral fractures are attributed to osteoporosis, they are usually not considered individually in osteoporotic studies because of their lower incidence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of nondisplaced proximal humeral fractures in comparison with other outpatient-treated osteoporotic fractures, as well as to assess their functional impact and effects on patient-perceived quality of life.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, cross-sectional, prospective study, all osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women aged 50 years or older treated nonoperatively in 358 trauma centers were recorded during a 3-month period. Fractures were considered osteoporotic if caused by a low-energy trauma. Pathologic fractures were excluded. The incidence of proximal humeral fractures in relation to other osteoporotic fractures was calculated. Patients were interviewed by telephone 6 months after the fracture with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and EuroQoL 5D questionnaires.
RESULTS: This study comprised 5,147 women (mean age, 72.6 ± 7.5 years) with 5,268 fractures. Of these, 912 (17.5%) had had proximal humeral fractures. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 26.6 ± 25.7. Of the women, 67.3% had pain or discomfort and disclosed significant reductions in functional capacity, especially with regard to self-care (44.5%), daily life activities (56.5%), and anxiety or depression (32.7%).
CONCLUSION: Nondisplaced proximal humeral fractures are among the most common fractures associated with osteoporosis, and they can be a major cause of functional disability and reduction in subjective patient-perceived health.
Copyright © 2011 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21195633     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  27 in total

1.  Assessment of the restriction of arm elevation after intramedullary fixation for proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Hiroaki Inui; Katsuya Nobuhara
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-02-01

2.  The Axillary View Typically Does Not Contribute to Decision Making in Care for Proximal Humeral Fractures.

Authors:  Marschall B Berkes; Joshua S Dines; Jacqueline F Birnbaum; Lionel E Lazaro; Tristan C Lorich; Milton T M Little; Joseph T Nguyen; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-06-09

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of straight antegrade nailing in proximal humeral fractures: the rationale of the "proximal anchoring point".

Authors:  Simon A Euler; Maximilian Petri; Melanie B Venderley; Grant J Dornan; Werner Schmoelz; Travis Lee Turnbull; Michael Plecko; Franz S Kralinger; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Humeral bone fragility in patients with shoulder prosthesis: a case of humeral periprosthetic refracture.

Authors:  Stefano Giannotti; Vanna Bottai; Giacomo Dell'osso; Daniela Donati; Giulia Bugelli; Gaia De Paola; Giulio Guido
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2012-05-29

5.  Age-related changes in proximal humerus bone health in healthy, white males.

Authors:  S M Mantila Roosa; A L Hurd; H Xu; R K Fuchs; S J Warden
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Comparing Relative Value Units among Shoulder Arthroplasty, Hemiarthroplasty, and ORIF for Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly: Which is Most Worth Your Time?

Authors:  Marine Coste; Vineet Aggarwal; Neil V Shah; David Kim; Omar K Hariri; Louis M Day; Scott C Pascal; Jaydev B Mistry; William P Urban; William R Aibinder; Arvind G Von Keudell; Nishant Suneja
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-07

7.  No change in outcome ten years following locking plate repair of displaced proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Rachel Ranson; Rachel Roller; Nicket Dedhia; Connor P Littlefield; Sanjit Konda; Joseph D Zuckerman; Kenneth Egol
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-08-20

Review 8.  [Reduction techniques for minimally invasive stabilization of proximal humeral fractures].

Authors:  F J P Beeres; O M Quaile; B C Link; R Babst
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 1.154

9.  Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures in Austria between 1989 and 2008.

Authors:  H P Dimai; A Svedbom; A Fahrleitner-Pammer; T Pieber; H Resch; E Zwettler; H Thaler; M Szivak; K Amrein; F Borgström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Custom 3D Printed Jigs in Salvage Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Failed Four-Part Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation: A Case Report.

Authors:  Bharath Thati; Chandrasekhar Bodanki; Vamshi Kiran Badam; M V Reddy; A V Gurava Reddy
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2020
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.