Literature DB >> 12793573

The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus.

Markus J Tingart1, Maria Apreleva, Dietrich von Stechow, David Zurakowski, Jon J Warner.   

Abstract

The operative treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus can be complicated by poor bone quality. Our aim was to evaluate a new method which allows prediction of the bone quality of the proximal humerus from radiographs. Anteroposterior radiographs were taken of 19 human cadaver humeri. The cortical thickness was measured at two levels of the proximal humeral diaphysis. The bone mineral density (BMD) was determined for the humeral head (HH), the surgical neck (SN), the greater tuberosity (GT) and lesser tuberosity (LT) using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. The mean cortical thickness was 4.4 +/- 1.0 mm. Specimens aged 70 years or less had a significantly higher cortical thickness than those aged over 70 years. A significant positive correlation was found between cortical thickness and the BMD for each region of interest. The cortical thickness of the proximal diaphysis is a reliable predictor of the bone quality of the proximal humerus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12793573     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.85b4.12843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  46 in total

1.  The Hounsfield value for cortical bone geometry in the proximal humerus--an in vitro study.

Authors:  Daren Lim Fat; Jim Kennedy; Rose Galvin; Fergal O'Brien; Frank Mc Grath; Hannan Mullett
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Mark J Jo; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-09

3.  How to determine the bone mineral density of the distal humerus with radiographic tools?

Authors:  Philippe Clavert; R-M Javier; J L Charrissoux; L Obert; L Pidhorz; F Sirveaux; P Mansat; T Fabre
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 4.  Surgical treatment options in patients with impaired bone quality.

Authors:  Norman A Johanson; Jody Litrenta; Jay M Zampini; Frederic Kleinbart; Haviva M Goldman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Pectoralis major tendon repair: a biomechanical study of suture button versus transosseous suture techniques.

Authors:  William Thomas; Sabina Gheduzzi; Iain Packham
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Haptic assessment of bone quality in orthopedic surgery: no consensus but perspective for high training potential.

Authors:  Sven A F Tulner; Vilijam Zdravkovic; Fabrice Külling; Bernhard Jost; Gabor J Puskas
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2017-12-22

7.  Qualitative Evaluation of Digital Hand X-rays Is Not a Reliable Method to Assess Bone Mineral Density.

Authors:  Andrew J Miller; Christopher Jones; Frederick Liss; Jack Abboudi; William Kirkpatrick; Pedro Beredjiklian
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-01

8.  Three-dimensional analyses of proximal humeral fractures using computed tomography with multiplanar reconstruction: early stability of fixation after osteosynthesis in relation to preoperative bone quality.

Authors:  Koki Ueda; Satoshi Ikemura; Akihisa Yamashita; Takashi Harada; Tetsuya Watanabe; Kenzo Shirasawa
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-09-17

9.  Deltoid Tuberosity Index: A Simple Radiographic Tool to Assess Local Bone Quality in Proximal Humerus Fractures.

Authors:  Christian Spross; Nicola Kaestle; Emanuel Benninger; Jürgen Fornaro; Johannes Erhardt; Vilijam Zdravkovic; Bernhard Jost
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Long-term results after non-plate head-preserving fixation of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Christian Bahrs; Andreas Badke; Bernd Rolauffs; Kuno Weise; Sebastian Zipplies; Klaus Dietz; Christoph Eingartner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.