Literature DB >> 12170375

Bone mineral density measurement over the shoulder region.

A M Doetsch1, J Faber, N Lynnerup, I Wätjen, H Bliddal, B Danneskiold-Samsøe.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to (1). establish a method for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) over the shoulder region; (2). compare the relationship between shoulder BMD levels with hip BMD and body mass index (BMI); and (3). discuss the relevance of the shoulder scan as an early indicator of osteoporosis compared with hip scans, the latter representing a weight-bearing part of the skeleton. We developed a scanning procedure, including a shoulder fixation device, and determined the most appropriate software in order to establish a reference material with the highest possible precision. Duplicate scans of the dominant side shoulder on 80 healthy, non-osteoporotic Danish women revealed a coefficient of variation (CVSD) on BMD measurements of 1.7%, with no difference between young and old subjects. Shoulder BMD values were significantly lower than hip BMD values (P <0.00001). Both hip and shoulder values decreased with age (P <0.001). The difference between hip and shoulder BMD levels increased significantly with increased body mass index (BMI) (P <0.002). The positive relationship between the increased hip/shoulder BMD differential with BMI supports the conclusion that the shoulder is subject to the least relative influence of weight and stress loading because of migration of calcium to weight and stress-bearing areas. Since the effect of this migration could mask local osteoporotic bone loss, shoulder BMD measurement is likely to minimize false indicators of healthy bone in women with high BMI, and might therefore be a relevant early stage indicator of osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12170375     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-001-2082-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  5 in total

1.  The measurement of bone mineral density of bilateral proximal humeri using DXA in patients with unilateral rotator cuff tear.

Authors:  J H Oh; B W Song; S H Kim; J-A Choi; J W Lee; S W Chung; T-Y Rhie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Adaptation of the proximal humerus to physical activity: A within-subject controlled study in baseball players.

Authors:  Stuart J Warden; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Keith G Avin; Mariana E Kersh; Robyn K Fuchs; Roland Krug; Ryan J Bice
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Preoperative assessment of the cancellous bone mineral density of the proximal humerus using CT data.

Authors:  Dietmar Krappinger; Tobias Roth; Martin Gschwentner; Armin Suckert; Michael Blauth; Clemens Hengg; Franz Kralinger
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Age-related changes in proximal humerus bone health in healthy, white males.

Authors:  S M Mantila Roosa; A L Hurd; H Xu; R K Fuchs; S J Warden
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The influence of bone mineral density and cortical index on the complexity of fractures of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  J W A M den Teuling; B S Pauwels; L Janssen; C E Wyers; H M J Janzing; J P W van den Bergh; J W Morrenhof
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.853

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.