| Literature DB >> 22244352 |
Nadzirah Amiruddin1, Xin-Wei Lee, Damer P Blake, Yutaka Suzuki, Yea-Ling Tay, Lik-Sin Lim, Fiona M Tomley, Junichi Watanabe, Chihiro Sugimoto, Kiew-Lian Wan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Eimeria tenella is an apicomplexan parasite that causes coccidiosis in the domestic fowl. Infection with this parasite is diagnosed frequently in intensively reared poultry and its control is usually accorded a high priority, especially in chickens raised for meat. Prophylactic chemotherapy has been the primary method used for the control of coccidiosis. However, drug efficacy can be compromised by drug-resistant parasites and the lack of new drugs highlights demands for alternative control strategies including vaccination. In the long term, sustainable control of coccidiosis will most likely be achieved through integrated drug and vaccination programmes. Characterisation of the E. tenella transcriptome may provide a better understanding of the biology of the parasite and aid in the development of a more effective control for coccidiosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22244352 PMCID: PMC3315734 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Distribution of GO terms of unique and full-length transcripts of .
Figure 2Length distribution of (A) full-length cDNA sequences, and (B) ORF, (C) 5'UTR and (D) 3'UTR of the full-length cDNA sequences of .
SSR motif distribution in full-length cDNA sequences of Eimeria tenella
| SSR type | 5'UTR | ORF | 3'UTR | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mononucleotide | 8 | 4 | 6 | 18 |
| Dinucleotide | - | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Trinucleotide | 133 | 188 | 134 | 455 |
| Tetranucleotide | - | - | 21 | 21 |
| Hexanucleotide | 1 | 7 | - | 8 |
| Heptanucleotide | 2 | - | - | 2 |
| Nonanucleotide | - | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Decanucleotide | - | - | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 144 | 201 | 170 | 515 |
Codon usage in full-length coding sequences of Eimeria tenella
| AA | Codon | Frequency | Codon Usage Value* | AA | Codon | Frequency | Codon Usage Value* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phe | UUU | 2044 | 16.32 | Tyr | |||
| UUC | 2545 | 20.32 | UAC | 1726 | 13.78 | ||
| Leu | TER | UAA | 121 | 0.97 | |||
| UUG | 2262 | 18.06 | UAG | 114 | 0.91 | ||
| CUU | 2067 | 16.51 | His | ||||
| CUC | 2224 | 17.76 | CAC | 1715 | 13.69 | ||
| Gln | CAA | 2156 | 17.22 | ||||
| CUG | 3595 | 28.71 | |||||
| Ile | AUU | 1949 | 15.56 | Asn | AAU | 1480 | 11.82 |
| AUC | 1592 | 12.71 | AAC | 2301 | 18.37 | ||
| Lys | AAA | 2786 | 22.25 | ||||
| Met | AUG | 2553 | 20.39 | ||||
| Val | GUU | 2001 | 15.98 | Asp | GAU | 2237 | 17.86 |
| GUC | 1886 | 15.06 | GAC | 3588 | 28.65 | ||
| Glu | |||||||
| GUG | 2951 | 23.56 | |||||
| Ser | UCU | 1806 | 14.42 | Cys | |||
| UCC | 1413 | 11.28 | UGC | 1703 | 13.60 | ||
| UCA | 1297 | 10.36 | TER | UGA | 198 | 1.58 | |
| UCG | 1285 | 10.26 | Trp | UGG | 1299 | 10.37 | |
| Pro | CCU | 1777 | 14.19 | Arg | |||
| CCC | 1970 | 15.73 | CGC | 1952 | 15.59 | ||
| CCA | 1719 | 13.73 | |||||
| CCG | 1579 | 12.61 | CGG | 1331 | 10.63 | ||
| Thr | ACU | 1716 | 13.70 | Ser | |||
| ACC | 1263 | 10.09 | AGC | 2825 | 22.56 | ||
| ACA | 1734 | 13.85 | Arg | AGA | 1420 | 11.34 | |
| ACG | 1588 | 12.68 | AGG | 1393 | 11.12 | ||
| Ala | GCU | 3388 | 27.05 | Gly | GGU | 1252 | 10.00 |
| GCC | 2905 | 23.20 | GGC | 3142 | 25.09 | ||
| GGA | 2125 | 16.97 | |||||
| GCG | 2926 | 23.36 | GGG | 2007 | 16.03 |
*Codon usage values given are the frequency per 1000 codons.
Under-represented codons (frequency of usage less than 10 per 1000 codons) are in italics while over-represented codons (frequency of usage more than 30 per 1000 codons) are in bold.
Comparison of Kozak motif consensus sequences between Eimeria tenella, Toxoplasma gondii and higher eukaryotic organisms
| Position | -4 | -3 | -2 | -1 | ATG | +4 | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C/G | A | A | A | ATG | G | In this study | |
| C | A | A | A | ATG | G | [ | |
| Eukaryote | C | A/G | C | C | ATG | G | [ |