| Literature DB >> 34829991 |
Xueting Ma1,2, Baohong Liu1,2, Zhenxing Gong1,2, Zigang Qu1,2, Jianping Cai1,2.
Abstract
Protein phosphorylation is an important post-translational modification (PTM) involved in diverse cellular functions. It is the most prevalent PTM in both Toxoplasma gondii and Plasmodium falciparum, but its status in Eimeria tenella has not been reported. Herein, we performed a comprehensive, quantitative phosphoproteomic profile analysis of four stages of the E. tenella life cycle: unsporulated oocysts (USO), partially sporulated (7 h) oocysts (SO7h), sporulated oocysts (SO), and sporozoites (S). A total of 15,247 phosphorylation sites on 9514 phosphopeptides corresponding to 2897 phosphoproteins were identified across the four stages. In addition, 456, 479, and 198 differentially expressed phosphoproteins (DEPPs) were identified in the comparisons SO7h vs. USO, SO vs. SO7h, and S vs. SO, respectively. Gene Ontology (GO) term and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses of DEPPs suggested that they were involved in diverse functions. For SO7h vs. USO, DEPPs were mainly involved in cell division, actin cytoskeleton organization, positive regulation of transport, and pyruvate metabolism. For SO vs. SO7h, they were related to the peptide metabolic process, translation, and RNA transport. DEPPs in the S vs. SO comparison were associated with the tricarboxylic acid metabolic process, positive regulation of ATPase activity, and calcium ion binding. Time course sequencing data analysis (TCseq) identified six clusters with similar expression change characteristics related to carbohydrate metabolism, cytoskeleton organization, and calcium ion transport, demonstrating different regulatory profiles across the life cycle of E. tenella. The results revealed significant changes in the abundance of phosphoproteins during E. tenella development. The findings shed light on the key roles of protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation in the E. tenella life cycle.Entities:
Keywords: Eimeria tenella; differentially expressed phosphoproteins (DEPPs); life cycle; phosphoproteomic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34829991 PMCID: PMC8624187 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222212110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1(A) Distribution of phosphorylation on serine (pSer), threonine (pThr), and tyrosine (pTyr) for all phosphorylation sites. (B) Functional classification of phosphorylated proteins.
Figure 2(A) The number of DEPPs in each comparison. (B) Functional enrichment analysis results for DEPPs in SO7h vs. USO. (C) Functional enrichment analysis results for DEPPs in SO vs. SO7h. (D) Functional enrichment analysis results for DEPPs in S vs. SO.
Figure 3Protein phosphorylation heatmap, time series profiles, and functional enrichment results for (A) Cluster1, (B) Cluster 2, (C) Cluster 3, (D) Cluster 4, (E) Cluster 5, and (F) Cluster 6.
Figure 4Network topology analysis results for PPI networks based on each comparison. (A) SO7h vs. USO. (B) SO vs. SO7h. (C) S vs. SO.
Figure 5PPI networks for DEPPs based on each comparison. (A) SO7h vs. USO. (B) SO vs. SO7h. (C) S vs. SO. The node size represents the node degree in the PPI network; the nodes in the same module are arranged with the same color and nodes in grey represent proteins which are not clustered in any module using MCODE.