Literature DB >> 22237829

Minimally invasive heart valve surgery: how and why in 2012.

Rakesh M Suri1, Nassir M Thalji.   

Abstract

Cardiac surgical procedures via traditional sternotomy are safe and effective operations performed by cardiothoracic surgeons worldwide. However, postoperative limitations in upper extremity activity during bone healing are seen as undesirable by some. Percutaneous catheter-based attempts to emulate the outcomes of traditional cardiac surgical procedures have largely fallen short of established standards of efficacy and durability. The field of minimally invasive heart valve surgery thus developed out of a need to offer smaller, better-tolerated incisions to patients while maintaining high-quality clinical outcomes. These operations are safe and effective when performed by proficient surgical teams, allowing patients to resume normal activities more rapidly. We explore current evidence supporting the practice of minimally invasive heart valve surgery in 2012 and analyze the clinical impact of these nascent surgical platforms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22237829     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-011-0244-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  64 in total

1.  Beating heart catheter-based edge-to-edge mitral valve procedure in a porcine model: efficacy and healing response.

Authors:  James I Fann; Frederick G St Goar; Jan Komtebedde; Mehmet C Oz; Peter C Block; Elyse Foster; Jagdish Butany; Ted Feldman; Thomas A Burdon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-08-09       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  J. Maxwell Chamberlain Memorial Paper for adult cardiac surgery. Less-invasive mitral valve operations: trends and outcomes from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.

Authors:  James S Gammie; Yue Zhao; Eric D Peterson; Sean M O'Brien; J Scott Rankin; Bartley P Griffith
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  CABG vs. stenting--clinical implications of the SYNTAX trial.

Authors:  Thomas H Lee; L David Hillis; Elizabeth G Nabel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in octogenarian, high-risk, transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates.

Authors:  Andrew W ElBardissi; Prem Shekar; Gregory S Couper; Lawrence H Cohn
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; Michael J Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; Mathew Williams; Todd Dewey; Samir Kapadia; Vasilis Babaliaros; Vinod H Thourani; Paul Corso; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart J Pocock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Minimally invasive mitral valve operations.

Authors:  J L Navia; D M Cosgrove
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Impact of minimally invasive valvular heart surgery: a case-control study.

Authors:  E A Grossi; A C Galloway; G H Ribakove; P K Zakow; C C Derivaux; F G Baumann; D Schwesinger; S B Colvin
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Survival advantage and improved durability of mitral repair for leaflet prolapse subsets in the current era.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Hartzell V Schaff; Joseph A Dearani; Thoralf M Sundt; Richard C Daly; Charles J Mullany; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Thomas A Orszulak
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Effect of sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis on intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes.

Authors:  Willem Flameng; Marie-Christine Herregods; Hadewich Hermans; Gerry Van der Mieren; Monique Vercalsteren; Gert Poortmans; Jan Van Hemelrijck; Bart Meuris
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Robotic mitral valve repairs in 300 patients: a single-center experience.

Authors:  W Randolph Chitwood; Evelio Rodriguez; Michael W A Chu; Ansar Hassan; T Bruce Ferguson; Paul W Vos; L Wiley Nifong
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  3 in total

1.  Propensity-matched analysis of minimally invasive mitral valve repair using a nationwide surgical database.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nishi; Hiroaki Miyata; Noboru Motomura; Koichi Toda; Shigeru Miyagawa; Yoshiki Sawa; Shinichi Takamoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  The value of routine chest radiographs after minimally invasive cardiac surgery: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Martijn Tolsma; Mohamed Bentala; Peter M J Rosseel; Bastiaan M Gerritse; Homme A J Dijkstra; Paul G H Mulder; Nardo J M van der Meer
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 1.637

3.  Initial experience with percutaneous coronary sinus catheter placement in minimally invasive cardiac surgery in an academic center.

Authors:  Satoshi Hanada; Hajime Sakamoto; Michael Swerczek; Kenichi Ueda
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 2.217

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.