Literature DB >> 16928491

Survival advantage and improved durability of mitral repair for leaflet prolapse subsets in the current era.

Rakesh M Suri1, Hartzell V Schaff, Joseph A Dearani, Thoralf M Sundt, Richard C Daly, Charles J Mullany, Maurice Enriquez-Sarano, Thomas A Orszulak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Factors predicting long-term survival and reoperative risk after mitral valve repair for subsets with prolapse involving the anterior leaflet in the current era are unclear.
METHODS: Between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 1999, surgical correction of mitral regurgitation was performed in 2,219 patients. We analyzed a subset of 1,411 patients with isolated mitral regurgitation due to leaflet prolapse undergoing mitral repair or replacement (+/- coronary bypass).
RESULTS: Mean age was 64 years, and 1,003 (71%) were men. Mitral repair was performed in 1,173 (83%) patients. Factors independently predicting overall long-term survival included valve repair, younger age, better functional class, and the absence of significant coronary artery disease. After adjusting for these, smaller preoperative left ventricular end-systolic dimension and greater preoperative ejection fraction were associated with superior survival. Mitral reoperation occurred in 97 patients (75 repairs, 22 replacements), at a mean of 4.8 years after initial procedure. Cumulative risk of reoperation was similar for patients having valve repair or replacement. Factors predictive of need for reoperation after initial repair were younger age, anterior leaflet prolapse, chordal shortening, no leaflet resection, no prosthetic annuloplasty, greater than mild residual mitral regurgitation, and coronary artery disease. After valve replacement, the sole determinant of reoperation was use of a biological prosthesis. The durability of repair for prolapse of the anterior leaflet improved significantly during the second decade of the study.
CONCLUSIONS: Mitral repair affords superior long-term survival, with permanence comparable with mechanical valve replacement. In all categories of mitral leaflet prolapse, durability of valve repair has improved over the past decade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16928491     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  61 in total

1.  Impact of novel intraoperative evaluation for mitral valve regurgitation: the retrograde cardio-protective beating test.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Tachibana; Tetsuya Higami; Yasuko Miyaki; Tomohiro Nakagima; Toshiro Ito; Nobuyuki Takagi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Minimally invasive heart valve surgery: how and why in 2012.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Nassir M Thalji
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Minimally invasive mitral surgery: dangerous to dabble.

Authors:  James Edwards; Annette Mazzone; Gareth Crouch
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-03

4.  Early results of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: initial series in a public hospital in Australia.

Authors:  Tadashi Kitamura; James Edwards; Michael Worthington; Kaushalendra S Rathore; Manoranjan Misra; E K Slimani; G V Ramana Kumar; John Stubberfield; Robert G Stuklis
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-11-11

5.  The expanding role of mitral valve repair in triple valve operations: contemporary North American outcomes in 8,021 patients.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Vinod H Thourani; Brian R Englum; J Scott Rankin; Vinay Badhwar; Lars G Svensson; Gorav Ailawadi; Michael J Mack; Max He; J Matthew Brennan; Hartzell V Schaff; James S Gammie
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Robotic mitral valve repair for all categories of leaflet prolapse: improving patient appeal and advancing standard of care.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Harold M Burkhart; Kent H Rehfeldt; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Richard C Daly; Eric E Williamson; Zhuo Li; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Are patients with mitral regurgitation being referred too late for surgery?

Authors:  Michael A Borger; Thomas Walther; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  When is your surgeon good enough? When do you need a "referent surgeon"?

Authors:  Patrick M McCarthy
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Optimizing outcomes of robotic mitral valve repair for all prolapse anatomy: the Suri-Burkhart technique.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Harold M Burkhart
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-11

Review 10.  Robotically assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Kaushik Mandal; Hazaim Alwair; Wiley L Nifong; W Randolph Chitwood
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.