Literature DB >> 26112649

Propensity-matched analysis of minimally invasive mitral valve repair using a nationwide surgical database.

Hiroyuki Nishi1, Hiroaki Miyata, Noboru Motomura, Koichi Toda, Shigeru Miyagawa, Yoshiki Sawa, Shinichi Takamoto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the cases of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MICS-mitral) performed using right mini-thoracotomy (RT) with those performed using median sternotomy (MS).
METHODS: Between 2008 and 2012, 6137 patients underwent isolated mitral valve repair at 210 institutions and were registered in the Japan Adult Cardiovascular Surgery Database. We compared 756 who underwent MICS-mitral via RT to 5381 MS patients and performed a one-to-one matched analysis based on the estimated propensity score.
RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality was similar between both groups (RT vs. MS: 0.5 vs. 1.1%). Although the incidence of postoperative stroke, renal failure, and prolonged ventilation was similar, the number of patients with mediastinitis was greater in the MS group (RT vs. MS: 0 vs. 0.7%, p < 0.01). Reexploration for bleeding was more frequent in the RT group (RT vs. MS: 2.9 vs. 1.4%, p < 0.01). Mortality and morbidity occurred at a higher rate in low-volume institutions. The propensity analysis showed that the operation-related times were significantly longer in the RT group, while the length of hospital stay was shorter. In a propensity analysis of patients <60 years of age, there was no in-hospital mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: MICS-mitral via RT was successful without compromising the clinical outcomes. Although the operation time and postoperative bleeding should be improved, an RT approach is safe in appropriately selected patients, especially those <60 years of age or treated in a high-volume center.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26112649     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-015-1210-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  30 in total

1.  Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approaches for mitral reconstruction: comparison of intermediate-term results.

Authors:  E A Grossi; A LaPietra; G H Ribakove; J Delianides; R Esposito; A T Culliford; C C Derivaux; R M Applebaum; I Kronzon; B M Steinberg; F G Baumann; A C Galloway; S B Colvin
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Minimally invasive port access versus conventional mitral valve surgery: prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Selami Dogan; Tayfun Aybek; Petar S Risteski; Farooq Detho; Andrea Rapp; Gerhard Wimmer-Greinecker; Anton Moritz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  J. Maxwell Chamberlain Memorial Paper for adult cardiac surgery. Less-invasive mitral valve operations: trends and outcomes from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.

Authors:  James S Gammie; Yue Zhao; Eric D Peterson; Sean M O'Brien; J Scott Rankin; Bartley P Griffith
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2011: Annual report by The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery.

Authors:  Jun Amano; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Hiroyasu Yokomise
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-10

Review 5.  Minimally invasive valve surgery.

Authors:  Y Joseph Woo; Joerg Seeburger; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007

6.  Minimally invasive versus conventional open mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Davy C H Cheng; Janet Martin; Avtar Lal; Anno Diegeler; Thierry A Folliguet; L Wiley Nifong; Patrick Perier; Ehud Raanani; J Michael Smith; Joerg Seeburger; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2011-03

7.  Minimally invasive versus open mitral valve surgery: a consensus statement of the international society of minimally invasive coronary surgery (ISMICS) 2010.

Authors:  Volkmar Falk; Davy C H Cheng; Janet Martin; Anno Diegeler; Thierry A Folliguet; L Wiley Nifong; Patrick Perier; Ehud Raanani; J Michael Smith; Joerg Seeburger
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2011-03

8.  Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery in patients greater than 70 years old: a propensity-matched comparison.

Authors:  David M Holzhey; William Shi; Michael A Borger; Joerg Seeburger; Jens Garbade; Bettina Pfannmüller; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Robotic minimally invasive mitral valve reconstruction yields less blood product transfusion and shorter length of stay.

Authors:  Y Joseph Woo; Elliot A Nacke
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  The early and mid-term results of mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation in children.

Authors:  Zhaolei Jiang; Ju Mei; Fangbao Ding; Chunrong Bao; Jiaquan Zhu; Min Tang; Nan Ma; Jianbing Huang; Saie Shen
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 2.549

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive cardiac surgery in Japan: history and current status.

Authors:  Kazuma Okamoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-07-17

2.  Stonehenge technique is associated with faster aortic clamp time in group of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right infra-axillary thoracotomy.

Authors:  Masataka Yamazaki; Akihiro Yoshitake; Tatsuo Takahashi; Tsutomu Ito; Naritaka Kimura; Akinori Hirano; Yasunori Iida; Shuichiro Takanashi; Hideyuki Shimizu
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-08-16

Review 3.  Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through a right mini-thoracotomy.

Authors:  Taichi Sakaguchi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-09-16

4.  Transesophageal echocardiography in robot-assisted mitral valve repair for Barlow's disease: usefulness for predicting artificial ring size and artificial chordae length using the loop technique.

Authors:  Musashi Yahagi; Takuma Maeda; Hiroko Kanazawa; Kenji Yoshitani; Yoshihiko Ohnishi
Journal:  JA Clin Rep       Date:  2020-07-25

5.  Economic impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Johannes Petersen; Benjamin Kloth; Johanna Konertz; Jens Kubitz; Leonie Schulte-Uentrop; Gesche Ketels; Hermann Reichenspurner; Evaldas Girdauskas
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Benefits of robotically-assisted surgery for complex mitral valve repair.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Fujita; Takashi Kakuta; Naonori Kawamoto; Yusuke Shimahara; Shin Yajima; Naoki Tadokoro; Soichiro Kitamura; Junjiro Kobayashi; Satsuki Fukushima
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-08

7.  Long-term results after mitral valve surgery using minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach: a propensity matched comparison of a large single-center series.

Authors:  Ayse Cetinkaya; Anna Geier; Karin Bramlage; Stefan Hein; Peter Bramlage; Markus Schönburg; Yeong-Hoon Choi; Manfred Richter
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Robotic mitral valve replacements with bioprosthetic valves in 52 patients: experience from a tertiary referral hospital.

Authors:  Chia-Cheng Kuo; Hsiao-Huang Chang; Chung-Hsi Hsing; Hiong-Ping Hii; Nan-Chun Wu; Chin-Ming Hsu; Chun-I Chen; Bor-Chih Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.191

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.