Literature DB >> 11269456

Impact of minimally invasive valvular heart surgery: a case-control study.

E A Grossi1, A C Galloway, G H Ribakove, P K Zakow, C C Derivaux, F G Baumann, D Schwesinger, S B Colvin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The port access (PA) approach for valvular heart surgery is widely used, but few studies evaluating outcomes compared with the sternotomy approach have been performed.
METHODS: One hundred nine consecutive patients undergoing PA-isolated valve surgery were compared with 88 matched patients who underwent sternotomy-isolated valve surgery before the institution of the PA program. Case matching was performed by age, surgeon, congestive heart failure, position of operated valve, and history of previous surgery.
RESULTS: Analysis revealed that PA was associated with similar hospital mortality (p = 0.62), longer bypass times (p < 0.001), shorter length of stay (p = 0.02), fewer transfusions (p = 0.02), and fewer septic complications (p = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The PA approach for isolated valvular heart surgery provided patients with significantly improved clinical outcomes in their immediate perioperative course. Further studies are required to measure the impact of the PA approach on the patients' recovery after hospitalization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11269456     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02070-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  23 in total

1.  Evolving techniques for mitral valve reconstruction.

Authors:  Aubrey C Galloway; Eugene A Grossi; Costas S Bizekis; Greg Ribakove; Patricia Ursomanno; Julie Delianides; F Gregory Baumann; Frank C Spencer; Stephen B Colvin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Minimally invasive heart valve surgery: how and why in 2012.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Nassir M Thalji
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Port Access (Thru-Port System) video-assisted mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Ilaria Chirichilli; Riccardo D'Ascoli; David Rose; Giacomo Frati; Ernesto Greco
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Interactive translational research model and cadaveric simulation: where minimally invasive cardiac surgery and industry meet.

Authors:  Davida A Robinson; Jessie H Evans; Angelo J Martellaro; Carl A Johnson; Jude S Sauer; Peter A Knight
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-08

5.  Clinical outcomes associated with robotic repair of the mitral valve.

Authors:  Alfredo Trento
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Minimally Invasive Versus Full-Sternotomy Septal Myectomy for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Farah N Musharbash; Matthew R Schill; Vivek H Hansalia; Richard B Schuessler; Jeremy E Leidenfrost; Spencer J Melby; Ralph J Damiano
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug

Review 7.  Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through a right mini-thoracotomy.

Authors:  Taichi Sakaguchi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-09-16

8.  A minimally invasive approach is more cost-effective than a traditional sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Alexander Iribarne; Rachel Easterwood; Mark J Russo; Y Claire Wang; Jonathan Yang; Kimberly N Hong; Craig R Smith; Michael Argenziano
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Is minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery the new benchmark for treating mitral valve disease?

Authors:  Andrew B Goldstone; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-11

Review 10.  Minimally Invasive Cardiovascular Surgery: Incisions and Approaches.

Authors:  Nathaniel B Langer; Michael Argenziano
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.