| Literature DB >> 22235201 |
Faris Azzouni1, Alejandro Godoy, Yun Li, James Mohler.
Abstract
Despite the discovery of 5 alpha-reduction as an enzymatic step in steroid metabolism in 1951, and the discovery that dihydrotestosterone is more potent than testosterone in 1968, the significance of 5 alpha-reduced steroids in human diseases was not appreciated until the discovery of 5 alpha-reductase type 2 deficiency in 1974. Affected males are born with ambiguous external genitalia, despite normal internal genitalia. The prostate is hypoplastic, nonpalpable on rectal examination and approximately 1/10th the size of age-matched normal glands. Benign prostate hyperplasia or prostate cancer does not develop in these patients. At puberty, the external genitalia virilize partially, however, secondary sexual hair remains sparse and male pattern baldness and acne develop rarely. Several compounds have been developed to inhibit the 5 alpha-reductase isozymes and they play an important role in the prevention and treatment of many common diseases. This review describes the basic biochemical properties, functions, tissue distribution, chromosomal location, and clinical significance of the 5 alpha-reductase isozyme family.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22235201 PMCID: PMC3253436 DOI: 10.1155/2012/530121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Urol ISSN: 1687-6369
Different steroid families.
| Class | Example | Number of carbon atoms |
|---|---|---|
| Steroid backbone | Gonane | 17 |
| Estranes | Estradiol | 18 |
| Androstanes | Testosterone | 19 |
| Pregnanes | Progesterone | 21 |
| Glucocorticoids | Cortisol | 21 |
| Mineralocorticoids | Aldosterone | 21 |
| Cholanes | Cholic acid | 24 |
| Cholestanes | Cholesterol | 27 |
Figure 1Structure of various steroids.
Comparison between finasteride and dutasteride (referenced in text).
| Finasteride | Dutasteride | |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Steroidal 5 | Steroidal 5 |
|
| ||
| IC50 for 5 | 360, 69, 17.4 | 7, 6, 0.33 |
|
| ||
| FDA-approved clinical uses | Male androgenic alopecia | Benign prostatic enlargement |
|
| ||
| Clinical dose | 1 mg daily for male androgenic alopecia | 0.5 mg daily |
|
| ||
| Half-life (T 1/2) | 6–8 hours | 5 weeks |
|
| ||
| Suppression of DHT | ↓Serum DHT by 71% | ↓Serum DHT by 95% |
|
| ||
| ↓Intraprostatic DHT by 85% | ↓Intraprostatic DHT by 97–99% | |
Tissue distribution of 5α-reductase 1–3 according to different authors.
| Author isozymes studied | Tissue type | Materials and methods | 5 | 5 | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Eicheler et al. [ | Epidermis: genital (scrotum) nongenital (Axilla, breast, lip, eyelid) using a semiquantitative visual scale | Protein expression (IHC) using rabbit polyclonal antibodies against synthetic peptides from C-terminus parts of 5 | Nuclear, in epidermis from all sites: (scrotal> axilla> breast> lip> eye lid): | Cytoplasmic, in epidermis from all sites: | 5 |
|
| |||||
|
Aumüller et al. [ | Many tissue types, using a semiquantitative visual scale | Protein expression (IHC) using rabbit polyclonal antibodies against synthetic peptides from C-terminus parts of 5 | Mainly nuclear: Prostate: stroma (+), epithelium (+) | Mainly cytoplasmic: | 5 |
|
| |||||
|
Bayne et al. [ | Scalp biopsies from bald and non-bald men | Protein expression (IHC) using validated mouse monoclonal antibodies against peptides from N-terminus parts of 5 | In balding and non-balding scalp: 5 | In balding and nonbalding scalp: 5 | |
|
| |||||
|
Thigpen et al. [ | Autopsy and surgical tissue samples | Messenger RNA (NB) and protein expression (IHC and WB) using rabbit polyclonal antibodies against peptides from C-terminus parts of 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
|
| |||||
|
Thomas et al. [ | Prostate: BPH (TURP), ASCaP (RP), CaP metastasis in androgen deprivation-treated men (autopsy) | Protein expression (IHC) using rabbit polyclonal antibodies against peptides from N-terminus of 5 | Nuclear in BPH, shifts to cytoplasm in HGPIN and CaP | Mainly cytoplasmic in all specimens Immunostaining intensity: | All differences are statistically significant |
|
| |||||
|
Thomas et al. [ | Prostate: AS-CaP (RP) with Gleason score <7, 7, >7 | Protein expression (IHC) using validated rabbit polyclonal antibodies, evaluated by visually estimating percent of total tumor area showing low-, moderate, and high-intensity in relation to Gleason score | Mainly nuclear in BPH, nuclear and cytoplasmic in CaP (all grades), and in adjacent benign epithelial tissue Immunostaining intensity: | Mainly cytoplasmic in all samples (benign and malignant) Immunostaining intensity: | Staining in CaP-adjacent benign tissue is not significanty different from low- and high-grade CaP for either isozyme |
|
| |||||
|
Söderstöm et al. [ | Prostate: BPH (TURP) and AS-CaP via RP or RC | Messenger RNA expression (sqRT-PCR) and measurement of 5 | 5 | 5 | |
|
| |||||
|
Lehle et al. [ | BPH and CaP tissue post prostate biopsy or RP frozen in liquid nitrogen, one human liver sample | Messenger RNA expression (ISH, sqRT-PCR) | ISH showed that 5 | ISH showed that 5 | |
|
| |||||
|
Habib et al. [ | BPH tissue (TURP) frozen in liquid nitrogen or in ice-cold RPMI with FBS and archival PE-BPH tissue | Messenger RNA expression (ISH, RT-PCR) and measurement of enzyme activity at pH 5 and 7.5 using 3H-T at 37°C in homogenized pulverized frozen prostate tissue | 5 | 5 | |
|
| |||||
|
Bonkhoff et al. [ | BPH (TURP), AS-CaP (RP), CR-CaP (channeling TUR) | Protein expression (IHC) using polyclonal rabbit antibodies against peptides from C-terminus parts of 5 | Mainly nuclear, in normal prostate and BPH tissue (luminal epithelial > basal) and in stroma 5 | Mainly cytoplasmic (weak), in normal prostate and BPH tissue (basal > luminal epithelial) and stroma. | |
|
| |||||
|
Shirakawa et al. [ | BPH (RC) fixed in formaldehyde and paraffin-embedded | Messenger RNA (qRT-PCR), protein (IHC) expression using polyclonal rabbit antibodies against peptides from C-terminus parts of 5 | 5 | 5 | |
|
| |||||
|
Titus et al. [ | ASBP, AS-CaP and CR-CaP (RP or channeling TURP) tissue that was FFPE or snap frozen in liquid nitrogen | Protein expression (by IHC in TMAs that are quantified by visual scoring and digital image analysis and by WB) and enzyme activity in homogenized pulverized prostate tissue using 3H-ASD at 37°C | 5 | 5 | In all 3 tissues, expression of 5 |
|
| |||||
|
Godoy et al. [ | Benign and malignant human tissue TMAs | Protein expression (IHC) using validated monoclonal mouse antibody against peptide from N-terminus of 5 |
5 | 5 | |
|
| |||||
|
Yamana et al. [ | 20 benign human tissues, CaP, and breast cancer cell lines | 5 |
5 | 5 | |
ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay; IHC: immunohistochemistry; WB: western blot; NB: northern blot; FFPE: formalin fixed paraffin embedded; RS: root sheath; RP: radical prostatectomy; sqRT-PCR: semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; PE: paraffin-embedded; RPMI: Roswell Park Memorial Institute; FBS: fetal bovine serum; PT: proximal tubules; DT: distal tubules; CD: collecting ducts; TURP: transurethral resection of prostate; RC: radical cystectomy; HGPIN: high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia; ISH: in situ hybridization; RCC: renal cell carcinoma; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; adenoCA: adenocarcinoma; CA: carcinoma; YS: yolk sac; TMA: tissue microarray.
Comparison between PCPT and REDUCE.
| PCPT | REDUCE | |
|---|---|---|
| Sponsor | South West Oncology Group | GalxoSmithKline |
| Duration | 7 years | 4 years |
| Risk of CaP in participants | lower | higher |
| No. of participants | 18,882 randomized | 8122 randomized |
| Age | ≥55 years | 50–75 years |
| Entry serum PSA | ≤3.0 ng/mL | 2.5–10 ng/mL |
| Baseline biopsies | No | Yes (6–12 cores) within 6 months prior to enrollment |
| Study-mandated biopsies | Year 7 | Years 2 and 4 |
| Study-mandated biopsy cores | ≥6 (6 cores in nearly 80%) | 10 (83% had at least 1 biopsy) |
| Overall relative risk reduction in CaP versus placebo | 25% | 23% |
| Incidence of Gleason sum ≥7 CaP | ↑26% (6.4% in finasteride versus 5.1% in placebo), | Same (6.7% in dutasteride versus 6.8%: in placebo) |
| Incidence of Gleason sum ≥8 CaP | ↑91% (2.1% in finasteride versus 1.1% in placebo), | Same over 4 years (0.9% in dutasteride versus 0.6% in placebo); however, in years 3-4, there were 12 GS ≥8 CaP in dutasteride group (0.5%) versus 1 in placebo group (<0.1%), |