PURPOSE: We determined the response rate to and safety of a dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor, dutasteride, in men with castration recurrent prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 28 men with asymptomatic castration recurrent prostate cancer were treated with 3.5 mg dutasteride daily (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone treatment continued), and evaluated monthly for response and toxicity. Eligibility included appropriate duration antiandrogen withdrawal, baseline prostate specific antigen 2.0 ng/ml or greater and a new lesion on bone scan, increase in measurable disease using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, or 2 or more consecutive prostate specific antigen measurements increased over baseline. Outcomes were progression, stable disease, partial response (prostate specific antigen less than 50% of enrollment for 4 or more weeks) or complete response. RESULTS: There were 25 evaluable men with a mean age of 70 years (range 57 to 88), a mean prostate specific antigen of 61.9 ng/ml (range 5.0 to 488.9) and mean Gleason score 8 (range 6 to 10), 15 of whom had bone metastases. Eight men had 10 grade 3 or higher adverse events using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria, all of which were judged to be unrelated to treatment. Of the 25 men 14 had disease progression by 2 months, 9 had stable (2.5, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 8.5, 9 months) disease, 2 had a partial response and none had a complete response. Overall median time to progression was 1.87 months (range 1 to 10, 95% CI 1.15-3.91). CONCLUSIONS: Dutasteride rarely produces biochemical responses in men with castration recurrent prostate cancer. However, further study is warranted given its favorable safety profile.
PURPOSE: We determined the response rate to and safety of a dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor, dutasteride, in men with castration recurrent prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 28 men with asymptomatic castration recurrent prostate cancer were treated with 3.5 mg dutasteride daily (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone treatment continued), and evaluated monthly for response and toxicity. Eligibility included appropriate duration antiandrogen withdrawal, baseline prostate specific antigen 2.0 ng/ml or greater and a new lesion on bone scan, increase in measurable disease using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, or 2 or more consecutive prostate specific antigen measurements increased over baseline. Outcomes were progression, stable disease, partial response (prostate specific antigen less than 50% of enrollment for 4 or more weeks) or complete response. RESULTS: There were 25 evaluable men with a mean age of 70 years (range 57 to 88), a mean prostate specific antigen of 61.9 ng/ml (range 5.0 to 488.9) and mean Gleason score 8 (range 6 to 10), 15 of whom had bone metastases. Eight men had 10 grade 3 or higher adverse events using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria, all of which were judged to be unrelated to treatment. Of the 25 men 14 had disease progression by 2 months, 9 had stable (2.5, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 8.5, 9 months) disease, 2 had a partial response and none had a complete response. Overall median time to progression was 1.87 months (range 1 to 10, 95% CI 1.15-3.91). CONCLUSIONS:Dutasteride rarely produces biochemical responses in men with castration recurrent prostate cancer. However, further study is warranted given its favorable safety profile.
Authors: G J Bubley; M Carducci; W Dahut; N Dawson; D Daliani; M Eisenberger; W D Figg; B Freidlin; S Halabi; G Hudes; M Hussain; R Kaplan; C Myers; W Oh; D P Petrylak; E Reed; B Roth; O Sartor; H Scher; J Simons; V Sinibaldi; E J Small; M R Smith; D L Trump; G Wilding Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J Tan; Y Sharief; K G Hamil; C W Gregory; D Y Zang; M Sar; P H Gumerlock; R W deVere White; T G Pretlow; S E Harris; E M Wilson; J L Mohler; F S French Journal: Mol Endocrinol Date: 1997-04
Authors: Daniel P Petrylak; Catherine M Tangen; Maha H A Hussain; Primo N Lara; Jeffrey A Jones; Mary Ellen Taplin; Patrick A Burch; Donna Berry; Carol Moinpour; Manish Kohli; Mitchell C Benson; Eric J Small; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James L Mohler; Christopher W Gregory; O Harris Ford; Desok Kim; Catharina M Weaver; Peter Petrusz; Elizabeth M Wilson; Frank S French Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: William K Oh; Philip W Kantoff; Vivian Weinberg; Graham Jones; Brian I Rini; Mika K Derynck; Robert Bok; Matthew R Smith; Glenn J Bubley; Robert T Rosen; Robert S DiPaola; Eric J Small Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-08-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mario A Eisenberger; Menachem Laufer; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Oliver Sartor; Donald Thornton; Blake Lee Neubauer; Victoria Sinibaldi; Gary Lieskovsky; Michael A Carducci; Mariana Zahurak; Derek Raghavan Journal: Urology Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Eric J Small; Susan Halabi; Nancy A Dawson; Walter M Stadler; Brian I Rini; Joel Picus; Preston Gable; Frank M Torti; Ellen Kaplan; Nicholas J Vogelzang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Janet K Hess-Wilson; Siobhan L Webb; Hannah K Daly; Yuet-Kin Leung; Joanne Boldison; Clay E S Comstock; Maureen A Sartor; Shuk-Mei Ho; Karen E Knudsen Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Mark A Titus; Yun Li; Olga G Kozyreva; Varun Maher; Alejandro Godoy; Gary J Smith; James L Mohler Journal: Prostate Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 4.104