Literature DB >> 12824459

The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer.

Ian M Thompson1, Phyllis J Goodman, Catherine M Tangen, M Scott Lucia, Gary J Miller, Leslie G Ford, Michael M Lieber, R Duane Cespedes, James N Atkins, Scott M Lippman, Susie M Carlin, Anne Ryan, Connie M Szczepanek, John J Crowley, Charles A Coltman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Androgens are involved in the development of prostate cancer. Finasteride, an inhibitor of 5alpha-reductase, inhibits the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone, the primary androgen in the prostate, and may reduce the risk of prostate cancer.
METHODS: In the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, we randomly assigned 18,882 men 55 years of age or older with a normal digital rectal examination and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 3.0 ng per milliliter or lower to treatment with finasteride (5 mg per day) or placebo for seven years. Prostate biopsy was recommended if the annual PSA level, adjusted for the effect of finasteride, exceeded 4.0 ng per milliliter or if the digital rectal examination was abnormal. It was anticipated that 60 percent of participants would have prostate cancer diagnosed during the study or would undergo biopsy at the end of the study. The primary end point was the prevalence of prostate cancer during the seven years of the study.
RESULTS: Prostate cancer was detected in 803 of the 4368 men in the finasteride group who had data for the final analysis (18.4 percent) and 1147 of the 4692 men in the placebo group who had such data (24.4 percent), for a 24.8 percent reduction in prevalence over the seven-year period (95 percent confidence interval, 18.6 to 30.6 percent; P<0.001). Tumors of Gleason grade 7, 8, 9, or 10 were more common in the finasteride group (280 of 757 tumors [37.0 percent], or 6.4 percent of the 4368 men included in the final analysis) than in the placebo group (237 of 1068 tumors [22.2 percent], P<0.001 for the comparison between groups; or 5.1 percent of the 4692 men included in the final analysis, P=0.005 for the comparison between groups). Sexual side effects were more common in finasteride-treated men, whereas urinary symptoms were more common in men receiving placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: Finasteride prevents or delays the appearance of prostate cancer, but this possible benefit and a reduced risk of urinary problems must be weighed against sexual side effects and the increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer. Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12824459     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa030660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  672 in total

1.  Adding the Team into T1 Translational Research: A Case Study of Multidisciplinary Team Science in the Evaluation of Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer Risk and Prognosis.

Authors:  Michael T Marrone; Corinne E Joshu; Sarah B Peskoe; Angelo M De Marzo; Christopher M Heaphy; Shawn E Lupold; Alan K Meeker; Elizabeth A Platz
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 2.  Serum markers in prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Ola Bratt; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Calibrating disease progression models using population data: a critical precursor to policy development in cancer control.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Lurdes Inoue; Jeffrey Katcher; William Hazelton; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 4.  An intermittent approach for cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Xiangwei Wu; Scott M Lippman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Musculoskeletal and prostate effects of combined testosterone and finasteride administration in older hypogonadal men: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephen E Borst; Joshua F Yarrow; Christine F Conover; Unyime Nseyo; John R Meuleman; Judyta A Lipinska; Randy W Braith; Darren T Beck; Jeffrey S Martin; Matthew Morrow; Shirley Roessner; Luke A Beggs; Sean C McCoy; Darryl F Cannady; Jonathan J Shuster
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.310

6.  Targeted androgen pathway suppression in localized prostate cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Elahe A Mostaghel; Peter S Nelson; Paul Lange; Daniel W Lin; Mary Ellen Taplin; Steven Balk; William Ellis; Philip Kantoff; Brett Marck; Daniel Tamae; Alvin M Matsumoto; Lawrence D True; Robert Vessella; Trevor Penning; Rachel Hunter Merrill; Roman Gulati; Bruce Montgomery
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Future directions in the prevention of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; April B Cabang; Michael J Wargovich
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Prostate cancer: alcohol, cancer and 5α-reductase inhibitors-is there a link?

Authors:  Leonard G Gomella
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  Prostate-specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna P Ankerst
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  [Hypogonadism in the elderly man. Reliable diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  M Zitzmann; E Nieschlag
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.