Literature DB >> 3558966

High-frequency audiometric assessment of a young adult population.

D M Green, G Kidd, K N Stevens.   

Abstract

The hearing thresholds of 37 young adults (18-26 years) were measured at 13 frequencies (8, 9,10,...,20 kHz) using a newly developed high-frequency audiometer. All subjects were screened at 15 dB HL at the low audiometric frequencies, had tympanometry within normal limits, and had no history of significant hearing problems. The audiometer delivers sound from a driver unit to the ear canal through a lossy tube and earpiece providing a source impedance essentially equal to the characteristic impedance of the tube. A small microphone located within the earpiece is used to measure the response of the ear canal when an impulse is applied at the driver unit. From this response, a gain function is calculated relating the equivalent sound-pressure level of the source to the SPL at the medial end of the ear canal. For the subjects tested, this gain function showed a gradual increase from 2 to 12 dB over the frequency range. The standard deviation of the gain function was about 2.5 dB across subjects in the lower frequency region (8-14 kHz) and about 4 dB at the higher frequencies. Cross modes and poor fit of the earpiece to the ear canal prevented accurate calibration for some subjects at the highest frequencies. The average SPL at threshold was 23 dB at 8 kHz, 30 dB at 12 kHz, and 87 dB at 18 kHz. Despite the homogeneous nature of the sample, the younger subjects in the sample had reliably better thresholds than the older subjects. Repeated measurements of threshold over an interval as long as 1 month showed a standard deviation of 2.5 dB at the lower frequencies (8-14 kHz) and 4.5 dB at the higher frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3558966     DOI: 10.1121/1.394914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Inverse solution of ear-canal area function from reflectance.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Temporary threshold shift after impulse-noise during video game play: laboratory data.

Authors:  C Spankovich; S K Griffiths; E Lobariñas; K E Morgenstein; S de la Calle; V Ledon; D Guercio; C G Le Prell
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels.

Authors:  Natalie N Souza; Sumitrajit Dhar; Stephen T Neely; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar; Rebekah Abel; Renee Banakis; Evan Grolley; Jungwha Lee; Steven Zecker; Jonathan Siegel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Auditory and tactile gap discrimination by observers with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne; Timothy J Villabona
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Ecological cocktail party listening reveals the utility of extended high-frequency hearing.

Authors:  Brian B Monson; Jenna Rock; Anneliese Schulz; Elissa Hoffman; Emily Buss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Are some people suffering as a result of increasing mass exposure of the public to ultrasound in air?

Authors:  T G Leighton
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.704

8.  Spectro-temporal characteristics of speech at high frequencies, and the potential for restoration of audibility to people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone; Christian Füllgrabe; Brian R Glasberg; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  High-frequency click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and behavioral thresholds in humans.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Denis F Fitzpatrick; John C Ellison; Walt Jesteadt; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Extended high-frequency thresholds in college students: effects of music player use and other recreational noise.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Christopher Spankovich; Edward Lobariñas; Scott K Griffiths
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.