Literature DB >> 22222359

Working memory and inattentional blindness.

Keith Bredemeier1, Daniel J Simons.   

Abstract

Individual differences in working memory predict many aspects of cognitive performance, especially for tasks that demand focused attention. One negative consequence of focused attention is inattentional blindness, the failure to notice unexpected objects when attention is engaged elsewhere. Yet, the relationship between individual differences in working memory and inattentional blindness is unclear; some studies have found that higher working memory capacity is associated with greater noticing, but others have found no direct association. Given the theoretical and practical significance of such individual differences, more definitive tests are needed. In two studies with large samples, we tested the relationship between multiple working memory measures and inattentional blindness. Individual differences in working memory predicted the ability to perform an attention-demanding tracking task, but did not predict the likelihood of noticing an unexpected object present during the task. We discuss the reasons why we might not expect such individual differences in noticing and why other studies may have found them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22222359     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0204-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

1.  The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: the importance of working memory capacity.

Authors:  A R Conway; N Cowan; M F Bunting
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  Release of inattentional blindness by high working memory load: elucidating the relationship between working memory and selective attention.

Authors:  Jan W de Fockert; Andrew J Bremner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-09-19

3.  Is inattentional blindness related to individual differences in visual working memory capacity or executive control functioning?

Authors:  Emily M Hannon; Anne Richards
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Visual short-term memory load suppresses temporo-parietal junction activity and induces inattentional blindness.

Authors:  J Jay Todd; Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-12

5.  Attention capture is modulated in dual-task situations.

Authors:  Walter R Boot; James R Brockmole; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

6.  An automated version of the operation span task.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Richard P Heitz; Josef C Schrock; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

7.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Executive working memory load induces inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

9.  Predicting and manipulating the incidence of inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Anne Richards; Emily M Hannon; Nazanin Derakshan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-01-09

10.  What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness.

Authors:  Steven B Most; Brian J Scholl; Erin R Clifford; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  12 in total

1.  Out of Mind, Out of Sight: Unexpected Scene Elements Frequently Go Unnoticed Until Primed.

Authors:  George M Slavich; Philip G Zimbardo
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2013-12-01

2.  Individual differences in fluid intelligence predicts inattentional blindness in a sample of older adults: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Deirdre M O'Shea; Robert A Fieo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-08

3.  An Open-Source Cognitive Test Battery to Assess Human Attention and Memory.

Authors:  Maxime Adolphe; Masataka Sawayama; Denis Maurel; Alexandra Delmas; Pierre-Yves Oudeyer; Hélène Sauzéon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-10

4.  Classification of Electrophysiological Signatures With Explainable Artificial Intelligence: The Case of Alarm Detection in Flight Simulator.

Authors:  Eva Massé; Olivier Bartheye; Ludovic Fabre
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.739

5.  Animacy increases second target reporting in a rapid serial visual presentation task.

Authors:  Guadalupe Guerrero; Dustin P Calvillo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

6.  Executive function deficits associated with current and past major depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Keith Bredemeier; Stacie L Warren; Howard Berenbaum; Gregory A Miller; Wendy Heller
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.839

7.  Some See It, Some Don't: Exploring the Relation between Inattentional Blindness and Personality Factors.

Authors:  Carina Kreitz; Robert Schnuerch; Henning Gibbons; Daniel Memmert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The invisible breast cancer: Experience does not protect against inattentional blindness to clinically relevant findings in radiology.

Authors:  Lauren Williams; Ann Carrigan; William Auffermann; Megan Mills; Anina Rich; Joann Elmore; Trafton Drew
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-11-02

9.  Animacy, perceptual load, and inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Dustin P Calvillo; Russell E Jackson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

10.  Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities.

Authors:  Carina Kreitz; Philip Furley; Daniel Memmert; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.