Literature DB >> 27112561

Animacy increases second target reporting in a rapid serial visual presentation task.

Guadalupe Guerrero1, Dustin P Calvillo2.   

Abstract

Attentional blink occurs when two target items, T1 and T2, are presented within brief moments of each other in a series of rapidly presented items and participants fail to report T2. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of characteristics of T2 on T2 reporting. Participants (N = 67) completed 4 blocks of 40 trials. Each trial consisted of 15 images, two of which were designated as T1 and T2. T2 was manipulated in three ways: animacy (animate or inanimate), threat (threatening or nonthreatening), and lag (200 ms or 400 ms after T1). The results indicated that more T2s were reported at the longer lag and that animate objects were reported more often than inanimate objects at both lags. Threat did not have a significant effect on T2 reporting although it interacted with lag: threatening objects were reported more frequently than nonthreatening objects at lag 2 but this trend reversed at lag 4. The results were consistent with the animate monitoring hypothesis, which claims that animate objects, because of their importance in ancestral environments, attract attention more easily than inanimate objects. Animate objects appear to capture attention more easily than inanimate objects as second targets in a rapid serial visual presentation task. This result is similar to animacy advantages reported with other attention tasks and with memory tasks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animate monitoring; Attentional blink; Threat superiority

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27112561     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1040-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  28 in total

1.  The attentional blink: resource depletion or temporary loss of control?

Authors:  Vincent Di Lollo; Jun-ichiro Kawahara; S M Shahab Ghorashi; James T Enns
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-04-29

2.  Attentional Blink to emotional and threatening pictures in spider phobics: electrophysiology and behavior.

Authors:  Ralf H Trippe; Johannes Hewig; Claudia Heydel; Holger Hecht; Wolfgang H R Miltner
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Adaptive memory: the mnemonic value of animacy.

Authors:  James S Nairne; Joshua E VanArsdall; Josefa N S Pandeirada; Mindi Cogdill; James M LeBreton
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-08-06

4.  Predicting and manipulating the incidence of inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Anne Richards; Emily M Hannon; Nazanin Derakshan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-01-09

5.  The Slow Time-Course of Visual Attention

Authors: 
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Animate Objects are Detected More Frequently than Inanimate Objects in Inattentional Blindness Tasks Independently of Threat.

Authors:  Dustin P Calvillo; Whitney C Hawkins
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2016

7.  Working memory and inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Keith Bredemeier; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

8.  Distinct processing for pictures of animals and objects: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Jiongjiong Yang; Aobing Wang; Ming Yan; Zijian Zhu; Cheng Chen; Yizhou Wang
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2012-01-16

9.  Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise.

Authors:  Joshua New; Leda Cosmides; John Tooby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Evolutionary relevance facilitates visual information processing.

Authors:  Russell E Jackson; Dusti P Calvillo
Journal:  Evol Psychol       Date:  2013-11-03
View more
  8 in total

1.  Adaptive memory: Animacy, threat, and attention in free recall.

Authors:  Juliana K Leding
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-04

2.  Selective Enhancement of Object Representations through Multisensory Integration.

Authors:  David A Tovar; Micah M Murray; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Animals Do Not Induce or Reduce Attentional Blinking, But They Are Reported More Accurately in a Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Task.

Authors:  Thomas Hagen; Bruno Laeng
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-10-16

4.  Cues to intention bias action perception toward the most efficient trajectory.

Authors:  Katrina L McDonough; Matthew Hudson; Patric Bach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Does Threat Have an Advantage After All? - Proposing a Novel Experimental Design to Investigate the Advantages of Threat-Relevant Cues in Visual Processing.

Authors:  Andras N Zsido; Arpad Csatho; Andras Matuz; Diana Stecina; Akos Arato; Orsolya Inhof; Gergely Darnai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-27

6.  Conscious perception of natural images is constrained by category-related visual features.

Authors:  Daniel Lindh; Ilja G Sligte; Sara Assecondi; Kimron L Shapiro; Ian Charest
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Adaptive Education: Learning and Remembering with a Stone-Age Brain.

Authors:  James S Nairne
Journal:  Educ Psychol Rev       Date:  2022-07-30

8.  The verb-self link: An implicit association test study.

Authors:  Patrick P Weis; Jan Nikadon; Cornelia Herbert; Magdalena Formanowicz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-05-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.