Literature DB >> 25001000

Individual differences in fluid intelligence predicts inattentional blindness in a sample of older adults: a preliminary study.

Deirdre M O'Shea1, Robert A Fieo.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that aging increases susceptibility to inattentional blindness (Graham and Burke, Psychol Aging 26:162, 2011) as well as individual differences in cognitive ability related to working memory and executive functions in separate studies. Therefore, the present study was conducted in an attempt to bridge a gap that involved investigating 'age-sensitive' cognitive abilities that may predict inattentional blindness in a sample of older adults. We investigated whether individual differences in general fluid intelligence and speed of processing would predict inattentional blindness in our sample of older adults. Thirty-six healthy older adults took part in the study. Using the inattentional blindness paradigm developed by Most et al. (Psychol Rev 112:217, 2005), we investigated whether rates of inattentional blindness could be predicted by participant's performance on the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices and a choice-reaction time task. A Mann-Whitney U test revealed that a higher score on the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices was significantly associated with lower incidences of inattentional blindness. However, a t test revealed that choice-reaction times were not significantly associated with inattentional blindness. Preliminary results from the present study suggest that individual differences in general fluid intelligence are predictive of inattentional blindness in older adults but not speed of processing. Moreover, our findings are consistent with previous studies that have suggested executive attention control may be the source of these individual differences. These findings also highlight the association between attention and general fluid intelligence and how it may impact environmental awareness. Future research would benefit from repeating these analyses in a larger sample and also including a younger comparison group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25001000     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0594-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  42 in total

1.  The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.

Authors:  A Miyake; N P Friedman; M J Emerson; A H Witzki; A Howerter; T D Wager
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Lapses of intention and performance variability reveal age-related increases in fluctuations of executive control.

Authors:  Robert West; Kelly J Murphy; Maria L Armilio; Fergus I M Craik; Donald T Stuss
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Transformations in the couplings among intellectual abilities and constituent cognitive processes across the life span.

Authors:  Shu-Chen Li; Ulman Lindenberger; Bernhard Hommel; Gisa Aschersleben; Wolfgang Prinz; Paul B Baltes
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-03

4.  Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005).

Authors:  Michael J Kane; David Z Hambrick; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging.

Authors:  R L West
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  A free, easy-to-use, computer-based simple and four-choice reaction time programme: the Deary-Liewald reaction time task.

Authors:  Ian J Deary; David Liewald; Jack Nissan
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-03

Review 7.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.

Authors:  T A Salthouse
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness.

Authors:  Steven B Most; Brian J Scholl; Erin R Clifford; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Does variability increase with age? An archival study of cognitive measures.

Authors:  C K Morse
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1993-06

10.  EPS Mid-Career Award 2004: brain mechanisms of attention.

Authors:  John Duncan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  3 in total

1.  Personal Audiovisual Aptitude Influences the Interaction Between Landscape and Soundscape Appraisal.

Authors:  Kang Sun; Gemma M Echevarria Sanchez; Bert De Coensel; Timothy Van Renterghem; Durk Talsma; Dick Botteldooren
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-22

2.  Sustained Inattentional Blindness Does Not Always Decrease With Age.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Congcong Yan; Xingli Zhang; Jie Fang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-29

3.  Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities.

Authors:  Carina Kreitz; Philip Furley; Daniel Memmert; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.