Keith Bredemeier1, Stacie L Warren2, Howard Berenbaum3, Gregory A Miller4, Wendy Heller3. 1. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States; University of Pennsylvania, United States. Electronic address: kbred@mail.med.upenn.edu. 2. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States; Palo Alto University, United States. 3. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States. 4. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States; University of California, Los Angeles, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although there has been extensive research showing that depression is associated with executive function (EF) deficits, the nature of these deficits is not clearly delineated. Specifically, previous reviews on this topic have yielded different conclusions about the particular domains of EF that are disrupted in depressed individuals. Further, research on whether these deficits persist after depressed mood has remitted is less prevalent and not consistent. METHODS: In two independent samples of college students, we examined associations between clinical ratings of current and past symptoms of a Major Depressive Episode (MDE) and difficulties in two domains of EF: inhibition and shifting. In Study 1 (n=162), EF was measured using behavioral tasks shown to index these two domains. In Study 2 (n=95), EF was measured using a self-report questionnaire believed to capture EF difficulties experienced in daily life. RESULTS: In both studies, past MDE symptoms were associated with worse shifting. In contrast, current MDE symptoms were associated with worse inhibition, though only on the behavioral measure (in Study 1). LIMITATIONS: Both studies used college samples and retrospective assessments of past symptoms. Further, only two domains of EF were examined, and the EF measures employed in each study have their own unique methodological limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that inhibition deficits vary as a function of current symptoms and thus may be a by-product of distress rather than a causal contributor. In contrast, shifting deficits associated with depression appear to be more enduring, suggesting that they could contribute to risk for depression.
BACKGROUND: Although there has been extensive research showing that depression is associated with executive function (EF) deficits, the nature of these deficits is not clearly delineated. Specifically, previous reviews on this topic have yielded different conclusions about the particular domains of EF that are disrupted in depressed individuals. Further, research on whether these deficits persist after depressed mood has remitted is less prevalent and not consistent. METHODS: In two independent samples of college students, we examined associations between clinical ratings of current and past symptoms of a Major Depressive Episode (MDE) and difficulties in two domains of EF: inhibition and shifting. In Study 1 (n=162), EF was measured using behavioral tasks shown to index these two domains. In Study 2 (n=95), EF was measured using a self-report questionnaire believed to capture EF difficulties experienced in daily life. RESULTS: In both studies, past MDE symptoms were associated with worse shifting. In contrast, current MDE symptoms were associated with worse inhibition, though only on the behavioral measure (in Study 1). LIMITATIONS: Both studies used college samples and retrospective assessments of past symptoms. Further, only two domains of EF were examined, and the EF measures employed in each study have their own unique methodological limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that inhibition deficits vary as a function of current symptoms and thus may be a by-product of distress rather than a causal contributor. In contrast, shifting deficits associated with depression appear to be more enduring, suggesting that they could contribute to risk for depression.
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Kathleen R Merikangas; Ellen E Walters Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-06
Authors: Rebecca Levin Silton; Wendy Heller; Anna S Engels; David N Towers; Jeffrey M Spielberg; J Christopher Edgar; Sarah M Sass; Jennifer L Stewart; Bradley P Sutton; Marie T Banich; Gregory A Miller Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2011-05
Authors: Gillian E Mead; Wendy Morley; Paul Campbell; Carolyn A Greig; Marion McMurdo; Debbie A Lawlor Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2009-07-08
Authors: Stacie L Warren; Laura D Crocker; Jeffery M Spielberg; Anna S Engels; Marie T Banich; Bradley P Sutton; Gregory A Miller; Wendy Heller Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Lauren K White; Tyler M Moore; Monica E Calkins; Daniel H Wolf; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Ellen Leibenluft; Daniel S Pine; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Sara N Rushia; Sophie Schiff; Dakota A Egglefield; Jeffrey N Motter; Alice Grinberg; Daniel G Saldana; Al Amira Safa Shehab; Jin Fan; Joel R Sneed Journal: J Psychiatr Brain Sci Date: 2020-06-19
Authors: Mary Rodríguez-Rabassa; Pablo López; Raphael Sánchez; Cyanela Hernández; Cesarly Rodríguez; Ronald E Rodríguez-Santiago; Juan C Orengo; Vivian Green; Yasuhiro Yamamura; Vanessa Rivera-Amill Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Gabriel G De la Torre; Sandra Doval; David López-Sanz; Manuel García-Sedeño; Miguel A Ramallo; Macarena Bernal; Sara González-Torre Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2021-03-19