Literature DB >> 15631594

What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness.

Steven B Most1, Brian J Scholl, Erin R Clifford, Daniel J Simons.   

Abstract

This article reports a theoretical and experimental attempt to relate and contrast 2 traditionally separate research programs: inattentional blindness and attention capture. Inattentional blindness refers to failures to notice unexpected objects and events when attention is otherwise engaged. Attention capture research has traditionally used implicit indices (e.g., response times) to investigate automatic shifts of attention. Because attention capture usually measures performance whereas inattentional blindness measures awareness, the 2 fields have existed side by side with no shared theoretical framework. Here, the authors propose a theoretical unification, adapting several important effects from the attention capture literature to the context of sustained inattentional blindness. Although some stimulus properties can influence noticing of unexpected objects, the most influential factor affecting noticing is a person's own attentional goals. The authors conclude that many--but not all--aspects of attention capture apply to inattentional blindness but that these 2 classes of phenomena remain importantly distinct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15631594     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  67 in total

Review 1.  Principles of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Jörn Diedrichsen; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Reflexive orienting by central arrows: evidence from the inattentional blindness task.

Authors:  Shai Gabay; Dolev Avni; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

3.  Strategies for Increasing the Accuracy of Interviewer Observations of Respondent Features: Evidence from the U.S. National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Brady T West; Frauke Kreuter
Journal:  Methodology (Gott)       Date:  2018-04-23

4.  Executive working memory load induces inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

5.  Capturing and holding attention: the impact of emotional words in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  Karen J Mathewson; Karen M Arnell; Craig A Mansfield
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

6.  Spatial ensemble statistics are efficient codes that can be represented with reduced attention.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The representation of simple ensemble visual features outside the focus of attention.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-04

8.  The effects of perceptual load on semantic processing under inattention.

Authors:  Mika Koivisto; Antti Revonsuo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

9.  The effects of individual differences and task difficulty on inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Daniel J Simons; Melinda S Jensen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

Review 10.  HOW DO RADIOLOGISTS USE THE HUMAN SEARCH ENGINE?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Karla K Evans; Trafton Drew; Avigael Aizenman; Emilie Josephs
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 0.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.