Literature DB >> 12811026

Genetics in primary care: a USA faculty development initiative.

Wylie Burke1, Louise Acheson, Jeffery Botkin, Kenneth Bridges, Ardis Davis, James Evans, Jaime Frias, James Hanson, Norman Kahn, Ruth Kahn, David Lanier, Linda E Pinsky, Nancy Press, Michele A Lloyd-Puryear, Eugene Rich, Nancy Stevens, Elizabeth Thomson, Steven Wartman, Modena Wilson.   

Abstract

The Genetics in Primary Care (GPC) project is a USA national faculty development initiative with the goal of enhancing the training of medical students and primary care residents by developing primary care faculty expertise in genetics. Educational strategies were developed for the project by an executive committee with input from an advisory committee, comprising individuals with primary care, medical education and genetics expertise. These committees identified the key issues in genetics education for primary care as (1) considering inherited disease in the differential diagnosis of common disorders; (2) using appropriate counseling strategies for genetic testing and diagnosis, and (3) understanding the implications of a genetic diagnosis for family members. The group emphasized the importance of a primary care perspective, which suggests that the clinical utility of genetic information is greatest when it has the potential to improve health outcomes. The group also noted that clinical practice already incorporates the use of family history information, providing a basis for discussing the application of genetic concepts in primary care. Genetics and primary care experts agreed that educational efforts will be most successful if they are integrated into existing primary care teaching programs, and use a case-based teaching format that incorporates both clinical and social dimensions of genetic disorders. Three core clinical skills were identified: (1) interpreting family history; (2) recognizing the variable clinical utility of genetic information, and (3) acquiring cultural competency. Three areas of potential controversy were identified as well: (1) the role of nondirective counseling versus shared decision-making in discussions of genetic testing; (2) the intrinsic value of genetic information when it does not influence health outcomes, and (3) indications for a genetics referral. The project provides an opportunity for ongoing discussion about these important issues. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 12811026     DOI: 10.1159/000065165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Genet        ISSN: 1422-2795


  13 in total

1.  Giving and withholding of information following genomic screening: challenges identified in a study of primary care physicians in Estonia.

Authors:  Liis Leitsalu; Laura Hercher; Andres Metspalu
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Development of a questionnaire for evaluating genetics education in general practice.

Authors:  Anna Flouris; Graeme Hawthorne; Maryanne Aitken; Clara Gaff; Sylvia A Metcalfe
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2010-10-16

3.  The use of a family history risk assessment tool within a community health care system: views of primary care providers.

Authors:  Carol A Christianson; Karen Potter Powell; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Susan H Blanton; Jessica Bogacik; Vincent C Henrich
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Primary care role in expanded newborn screening: After the heel prick test.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; June C Carroll; Julian Little; Judith Allanson; Jessica P Bytautas; Pranesh Chakraborty; Brenda J Wilson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  A randomized, controlled trial to increase discussion of breast cancer in primary care.

Authors:  Celia P Kaplan; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Jeffrey A Tice; Karla Kerlikowske; Steven E Gregorich; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Rena J Pasick; Alice Chen; Jessica Quinn; Leah S Karliner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  First Responder to Genomic Information: A Guide for Primary Care Providers.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.074

7.  Educational needs of primary care physicians regarding direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Karen P Powell; Carol A Christianson; Whitney A Cogswell; Gaurav Dave; Amit Verma; Sonja Eubanks; Vincent C Henrich
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Clinical use of the Surgeon General's "My Family Health Portrait" (MFHP) tool: opinions of future health care providers.

Authors:  Kailey M Owens; Monica L Marvin; Thomas D Gelehrter; Mack T Ruffin; Wendy R Uhlmann
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Genetic education for primary care providers: improving attitudes, knowledge, and confidence.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Andrea L Rideout; Brenda J Wilson; Judith Md Allanson; Sean M Blaine; Mary Jane Esplen; Sandra A Farrell; Gail E Graham; Jennifer MacKenzie; Wendy Meschino; Fiona Miller; Preeti Prakash; Cheryl Shuman; Anne Summers; Sherry Taylor
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Cancer genetic risk assessment and referral patterns in primary care.

Authors:  Hetal S Vig; Joanne Armstrong; Brian L Egleston; Carla Mazar; Michele Toscano; Angela R Bradbury; Mary B Daly; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2009-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.