Literature DB >> 22201413

Individual differences in the strength of taxonomic versus thematic relations.

Daniel Mirman1, Kristen M Graziano.   

Abstract

Knowledge about word and object meanings can be organized taxonomically (fruits, mammals, etc.) on the basis of shared features or thematically (eating breakfast, taking a dog for a walk, etc.) on the basis of participation in events or scenarios. An eye-tracking study showed that both kinds of knowledge are activated during comprehension of a single spoken word, even when the listener is not required to perform any active task. The results further revealed that an individual's relative activation of taxonomic relations compared to thematic relations predicts that individual's tendency to favor taxonomic over thematic relations when asked to choose between them in a similarity judgment task. These results indicate that individuals differ in the relative strengths of their taxonomic and thematic semantic knowledge and suggest that meaning information is organized in 2 parallel, complementary semantic systems. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22201413      PMCID: PMC3315601          DOI: 10.1037/a0026451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  33 in total

1.  Causes of taxonomic sorting by adults: a test of the thematic-to-taxonomic shift.

Authors:  G L Murphy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

2.  Food for thought: cross-classification and category organization in a complex real-world domain.

Authors:  B H Ross; G L Murphy
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  An apple is more than just a fruit: cross-classification in children's concepts.

Authors:  Simone P Nguyen; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

4.  Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm.

Authors:  Falk Huettig; Gerry T M Altmann
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-12-23

5.  No right to speak? The relationship between object naming and semantic impairment: neuropsychological evidence and a computational model.

Authors:  M A Lambon Ralph; J L McClelland; K Patterson; C J Galton; J R Hodges
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The differential dependence of abstract and concrete words upon associative and similarity-based information: Complementary semantic interference and facilitation effects.

Authors:  Sebastian J Crutch; Elizabeth K Warrington
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns.

Authors:  Ken McRae; Mary Hare; Jeffrey L Elman; Todd Ferretti
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-10

8.  Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: the role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Charting the progression in semantic dementia: implications for the organisation of semantic memory.

Authors:  J R Hodges; N Graham; K Patterson
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1995 Sep-Dec

10.  Looking for meaning: eye movements are sensitive to overlapping semantic features, not association.

Authors:  Eiling Yee; Eve Overton; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10
View more
  18 in total

1.  Am I looking at a cat or a dog? Gaze in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia is subject to excessive taxonomic capture.

Authors:  Mustafa Seckin; M-Marsel Mesulam; Joel L Voss; Wei Huang; Emily J Rogalski; Robert S Hurley
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Impact of action primes on implicit processing of thematic and functional similarity relations: evidence from eye-tracking.

Authors:  Ewa Pluciennicka; Yannick Wamain; Yann Coello; Solène Kalénine
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-06-16

Review 3.  Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Jon-Frederick Landrigan; Allison E Britt
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Temporal dynamics of activation of thematic and functional knowledge during conceptual processing of manipulable artifacts.

Authors:  Solène Kalénine; Daniel Mirman; Erica L Middleton; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Shared and Distinct Neuroanatomic Regions Critical for Tool-related Action Production and Recognition: Evidence from 131 Left-hemisphere Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Leyla Y Tarhan; Christine E Watson; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The cost of switching between taxonomic and thematic semantics.

Authors:  Jon-Frederick Landrigan; Daniel Mirman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02

7.  Thematic knowledge, artifact concepts, and the left posterior temporal lobe: Where action and object semantics converge.

Authors:  Solène Kalénine; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Damage to temporo-parietal cortex decreases incidental activation of thematic relations during spoken word comprehension.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Kristen M Graziano
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Statistical regularities shape semantic organization throughout development.

Authors:  Layla Unger; Olivera Savic; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-02-01

10.  Automatic and Controlled Semantic Retrieval: TMS Reveals Distinct Contributions of Posterior Middle Temporal Gyrus and Angular Gyrus.

Authors:  James Davey; Piers L Cornelissen; Hannah E Thompson; Saurabh Sonkusare; Glyn Hallam; Jonathan Smallwood; Elizabeth Jefferies
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.