Literature DB >> 27389801

Thematic knowledge, artifact concepts, and the left posterior temporal lobe: Where action and object semantics converge.

Solène Kalénine1, Laurel J Buxbaum2.   

Abstract

Converging evidence supports the existence of functionally and neuroanatomically distinct taxonomic (similarity-based; e.g., hammer-screwdriver) and thematic (event-based; e.g., hammer-nail) semantic systems. Processing of thematic relations between objects has been shown to selectively recruit the left posterior temporoparietal cortex. Similar posterior regions have also been shown to be critical for knowledge of relationships between actions and manipulable human-made objects (artifacts). Based on the hypothesis that thematic relationships for artifacts rely, at least in part, on action relationships, we assessed the prediction that the same regions of the left posterior temporoparietal cortex would be critical for conceptual processing of artifact-related actions and thematic relations for artifacts. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated processing of taxonomic and thematic relations for artifacts and natural objects as well as artifact action knowledge (gesture recognition) abilities in a large sample of 48 stroke patients with a range of lesion foci in the left hemisphere. Like control participants, patients identified thematic relations faster than taxonomic relations for artifacts, whereas they identified taxonomic relations faster than thematic relations for natural objects. Moreover, response times (RTs) for identifying thematic relations for artifacts selectively predicted performance in gesture recognition. Whole brain Voxel-based Lesion-Symptom Mapping (VLSM) analyses and Region of Interest (ROI) regression analyses further demonstrated that lesions to the left posterior temporal cortex, overlapping with LTO and visual motion area hMT+, were associated both with relatively slower RTs in identifying thematic relations for artifacts and poorer artifact action knowledge in patients. These findings provide novel insights into the functional role of left posterior temporal cortex in thematic knowledge, and suggest that the close association between thematic relations for artifacts and action representations may reflect their common dependence on visual motion and manipulation information.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action knowledge; Artifact concepts; Left posterior temporal cortex; Thematic knowledge; Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27389801      PMCID: PMC4969110          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  62 in total

1.  Objects and their actions: evidence for a neurally distributed semantic system.

Authors:  L K Tyler; E A Stamatakis; E Dick; P Bright; P Fletcher; H Moss
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  EEG theta and alpha responses reveal qualitative differences in processing taxonomic versus thematic semantic relationships.

Authors:  Mandy J Maguire; Matthew R Brier; Thomas C Ferree
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Concept Representation Reflects Multimodal Abstraction: A Framework for Embodied Semantics.

Authors:  Leonardo Fernandino; Jeffrey R Binder; Rutvik H Desai; Suzanne L Pendl; Colin J Humphries; William L Gross; Lisa L Conant; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Functional interactions during the retrieval of conceptual action knowledge: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Ann Assmus; Carsten Giessing; Peter H Weiss; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Elucidating the nature of deregulated semantic cognition in semantic aphasia: evidence for the roles of prefrontal and temporo-parietal cortices.

Authors:  Krist A Noonan; Elizabeth Jefferies; Faye Corbett; Matthew A Lambon Ralph
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  The lateral occipitotemporal cortex in action.

Authors:  Angelika Lingnau; Paul E Downing
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Action concepts in the brain: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christine E Watson; Eileen R Cardillo; Geena R Ianni; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Anatomic constraints on cognitive theories of category specificity.

Authors:  J T Devlin; C J Moore; C J Mummery; M L Gorno-Tempini; J A Phillips; U Noppeney; R S J Frackowiak; K J Friston; C J Price
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Is a single 'hub', with lots of spokes, an accurate description of the neural architecture of action semantics?: Comment on "Action semantics: A unifying conceptual framework for the selective use of multimodal and modality-specific object knowledge" by van Elk, van Schie and Bekkering.

Authors:  Alex Martin; W Kyle Simmons; Michael S Beauchamp; Stephen J Gotts
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain.

Authors:  Svenja Caspers; Karl Zilles; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Jon-Frederick Landrigan; Allison E Britt
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Sensory and semantic activations evoked by action attributes of manipulable objects: Evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Lee; Hsu-Wen Huang; Kara D Federmeier; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  The neurocognitive basis of knowledge about object identity and events: dissociations reflect opposing effects of semantic coherence and control.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jefferies; Hannah Thompson; Piers Cornelissen; Jonathan Smallwood
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Semantic memory for objects, actions, and events: A novel test of event-related conceptual semantic knowledge.

Authors:  Haley C Dresang; Michael Walsh Dickey; Tessa C Warren
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Differential Tuning of Ventral and Dorsal Streams during the Generation of Common and Uncommon Tool Uses.

Authors:  Heath E Matheson; Laurel J Buxbaum; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Learning, remembering, and predicting how to use tools: Distributed neurocognitive mechanisms: Comment on Osiurak and Badets (2016).

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Gesturing tool use and tool transport actions modulates inferior parietal functional connectivity with the dorsal and ventral object processing pathways.

Authors:  Frank E Garcea; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Verb-argument integration in primary progressive aphasia: Real-time argument access and selection.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; M-Marsel Mesulam; Emily J Rogalski; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Doctor, Teacher, and Stethoscope: Neural Representation of Different Types of Semantic Relations.

Authors:  Yangwen Xu; Xiaosha Wang; Xiaoying Wang; Weiwei Men; Jia-Hong Gao; Yanchao Bi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Semantic control deficits impair understanding of thematic relationships more than object identity.

Authors:  Hannah Thompson; James Davey; Paul Hoffman; Glyn Hallam; Rebecca Kosinski; Sarah Howkins; Emma Wooffindin; Rebecca Gabbitas; Elizabeth Jefferies
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.