Literature DB >> 22198475

Alchemical prediction of hydration free energies for SAMPL.

David L Mobley1, Shaui Liu, David S Cerutti, William C Swope, Julia E Rice.   

Abstract

Hydration free energy calculations have become important tests of force fields. Alchemical free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations provide a rigorous way to calculate these free energies for a particular force field, given sufficient sampling. Here, we report results of alchemical hydration free energy calculations for the set of small molecules comprising the 2011 Statistical Assessment of Modeling of Proteins and Ligands challenge. Our calculations are largely based on the Generalized Amber Force Field with several different charge models, and we achieved RMS errors in the 1.4-2.2 kcal/mol range depending on charge model, marginally higher than what we typically observed in previous studies (Mobley et al. in J Phys Chem B 111(9):2242-2254, 2007, J Chem Theory Comput 5(2):350-358, 2009, J Phys Chem B 115:1329-1332, 2011; Nicholls et al. in J Med Chem 51:769-779, 2008; Klimovich and Mobley in J Comput Aided Mol Design 24(4):307-316, 2010). The test set consists of ethane, biphenyl, and a dibenzyl dioxin, as well as a series of chlorinated derivatives of each. We found that, for this set, using high-quality partial charges from MP2/cc-PVTZ SCRF RESP fits provided marginally improved agreement with experiment over using AM1-BCC partial charges as we have more typically done, in keeping with our recent findings (Mobley et al. in J Phys Chem B 115:1329-1332, 2011). Switching to OPLS Lennard-Jones parameters with AM1-BCC charges also improves agreement with experiment. We also find a number of chemical trends within each molecular series which we can explain, but there are also some surprises, including some that are captured by the calculations and some that are not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22198475      PMCID: PMC3583515          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-011-9528-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  31 in total

1.  Calculation of the water-cyclohexane transfer free energies of neutral amino acid side-chain analogs using the OPLS all-atom force field.

Authors:  Justin L MacCallum; D Peter Tieleman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-11-30       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls; J Peter Guthrie; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Computations of Absolute Solvation Free Energies of Small Molecules Using Explicit and Implicit Solvent Model.

Authors:  Devleena Shivakumar; Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Prediction of Absolute Solvation Free Energies using Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Perturbation and the OPLS Force Field.

Authors:  Devleena Shivakumar; Joshua Williams; Yujie Wu; Wolfgang Damm; John Shelley; Woody Sherman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Wei Wang; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.518

7.  Accurate and efficient corrections for missing dispersion interactions in molecular simulations.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  A blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: introduction and overview.

Authors:  J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  An interpretation of the enhancement of the water dipole moment due to the presence of other water molecules.

Authors:  Daniel D Kemp; Mark S Gordon
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 2.781

10.  Application of Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Molecular Property Prediction I: Density and Heat of Vaporization.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Hou Tingjun
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  32 in total

1.  Calculating Partition Coefficients of Small Molecules in Octanol/Water and Cyclohexane/Water.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; Gaetano Calabró; Daisy Y Kyu; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Lead optimization mapper: automating free energy calculations for lead optimization.

Authors:  Shuai Liu; Yujie Wu; Teng Lin; Robert Abel; Jonathan P Redmann; Christopher M Summa; Vivian R Jaber; Nathan M Lim; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Testing the semi-explicit assembly solvation model in the SAMPL3 community blind test.

Authors:  Charles W Kehoe; Christopher J Fennell; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Predicting the excess solubility of acetanilide, acetaminophen, phenacetin, benzocaine, and caffeine in binary water/ethanol mixtures via molecular simulation.

Authors:  Andrew S Paluch; Sreeja Parameswaran; Shuai Liu; Anasuya Kolavennu; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Is ring breaking feasible in relative binding free energy calculations?

Authors:  Shuai Liu; Lingle Wang; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Perspective: Alchemical free energy calculations for drug discovery.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Pavel V Klimovich
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Comparison of Methods To Reweight from Classical Molecular Simulations to QM/MM Potentials.

Authors:  Eric C Dybeck; Gerhard König; Bernard R Brooks; Michael R Shirts
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  An efficient protocol for obtaining accurate hydration free energies using quantum chemistry and reweighting from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Andrew C Simmonett; Yihan Shao; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Escaping Atom Types in Force Fields Using Direct Chemical Perception.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Caitlin C Bannan; Andrea Rizzi; Christopher I Bayly; John D Chodera; Victoria T Lim; Nathan M Lim; Kyle A Beauchamp; David R Slochower; Michael R Shirts; Michael K Gilson; Peter K Eastman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Parameterization of an effective potential for protein-ligand binding from host-guest affinity data.

Authors:  Lauren Wickstrom; Nanjie Deng; Peng He; Ahmet Mentes; Crystal Nguyen; Michael K Gilson; Tom Kurtzman; Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 2.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.