Literature DB >> 22205387

Testing the semi-explicit assembly solvation model in the SAMPL3 community blind test.

Charles W Kehoe1, Christopher J Fennell, Ken A Dill.   

Abstract

We report here a test of the Semi-Explicit Assembly (SEA) model in the solvation free energy category of the SAMPL3 blind prediction event (summer 2011). We tested how dependent the SEA results are on the chosen force field by performing calculations with both the General Amber and OPLS force fields. We compared our SEA results with full molecular dynamics simulations in explicit solvent. Of the 20 submissions, our SEA/OPLS results gave the second smallest RMS errors in free energies compared to experiments. SEA gives results that are very similar to those of its underlying force field and explicit solvent model. Hence, while the SEA water modeling approach is much faster than explicit solvent simulations, its predictions appear to be just as accurate.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22205387     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-011-9536-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  16 in total

1.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome.

Authors:  N A Baker; D Sept; S Joseph; M J Holst; J A McCammon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls; J Peter Guthrie; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Prediction of Absolute Solvation Free Energies using Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Perturbation and the OPLS Force Field.

Authors:  Devleena Shivakumar; Joshua Williams; Yujie Wu; Wolfgang Damm; John Shelley; Woody Sherman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Estimation of Absolute Free Energies of Hydration Using Continuum Methods:  Accuracy of Partial Charge Models and Optimization of Nonpolar Contributions.

Authors:  Robert C Rizzo; Tiba Aynechi; David A Case; Irwin D Kuntz
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Wei Wang; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.518

8.  Comparison of charge models for fixed-charge force fields: small-molecule hydration free energies in explicit solvent.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Elise Dumont; John D Chodera; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Nonlinear scaling schemes for Lennard-Jones interactions in free energy calculations.

Authors:  Thomas Steinbrecher; David L Mobley; David A Case
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  A blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: introduction and overview.

Authors:  J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

View more
  14 in total

1.  Adapting the semi-explicit assembly solvation model for estimating water-cyclohexane partitioning with the SAMPL5 molecules.

Authors:  Emiliano Brini; S Shanaka Paranahewage; Christopher J Fennell; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Perspective: Alchemical free energy calculations for drug discovery.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Pavel V Klimovich
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Predicting hydration free energies with a hybrid QM/MM approach: an evaluation of implicit and explicit solvation models in SAMPL4.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Frank C Pickard; Ye Mei; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Extended solvent-contact model approach to SAMPL4 blind prediction challenge for hydration free energies.

Authors:  Hwangseo Park
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Testing the semi-explicit assembly model of aqueous solvation in the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  Libo Li; Ken A Dill; Christopher J Fennell
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Calculating distribution coefficients based on multi-scale free energy simulations: an evaluation of MM and QM/MM explicit solvent simulations of water-cyclohexane transfer in the SAMPL5 challenge.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Frank C Pickard; Jing Huang; Andrew C Simmonett; Florentina Tofoleanu; Juyong Lee; Pavlo O Dral; Samarjeet Prasad; Michael Jones; Yihan Shao; Walter Thiel; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Hexahydrated Mg2+ Binding and Outer-Shell Dehydration on RNA Surface.

Authors:  Tao Yu; Shi-Jie Chen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  FreeSolv: a database of experimental and calculated hydration free energies, with input files.

Authors:  David L Mobley; J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Alchemical prediction of hydration free energies for SAMPL.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Shaui Liu; David S Cerutti; William C Swope; Julia E Rice
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  An efficient protocol for obtaining accurate hydration free energies using quantum chemistry and reweighting from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Andrew C Simmonett; Yihan Shao; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.