Literature DB >> 23267463

Perspective: Alchemical free energy calculations for drug discovery.

David L Mobley1, Pavel V Klimovich.   

Abstract

Computational techniques see widespread use in pharmaceutical drug discovery, but typically prove unreliable in predicting trends in protein-ligand binding. Alchemical free energy calculations seek to change that by providing rigorous binding free energies from molecular simulations. Given adequate sampling and an accurate enough force field, these techniques yield accurate free energy estimates. Recent innovations in alchemical techniques have sparked a resurgence of interest in these calculations. Still, many obstacles stand in the way of their routine application in a drug discovery context, including the one we focus on here, sampling. Sampling of binding modes poses a particular challenge as binding modes are often separated by large energy barriers, leading to slow transitions. Binding modes are difficult to predict, and in some cases multiple binding modes may contribute to binding. In view of these hurdles, we present a framework for dealing carefully with uncertainty in binding mode or conformation in the context of free energy calculations. With careful sampling, free energy techniques show considerable promise for aiding drug discovery.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23267463      PMCID: PMC3537745          DOI: 10.1063/1.4769292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  100 in total

1.  Excess free energy of liquids from molecular dynamics simulations. Application to water models.

Authors:  J Hermans; A Pathiaseril; A Anderson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1988-08-01       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Prediction of Absolute Solvation Free Energies using Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Perturbation and the OPLS Force Field.

Authors:  Devleena Shivakumar; Joshua Williams; Yujie Wu; Wolfgang Damm; John Shelley; Woody Sherman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Alchemical free energy calculations and multiple conformational substates.

Authors:  Martin Leitgeb; Christian Schröder; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Outliers in SAR and QSAR: is unusual binding mode a possible source of outliers?

Authors:  Ki Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Accurate and efficient corrections for missing dispersion interactions in molecular simulations.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 6.  Strategies and tactics for optimizing the Hit-to-Lead process and beyond--a computational chemistry perspective.

Authors:  Charles J Manly; Jayaraman Chandrasekhar; Joseph W Ochterski; Jack D Hammer; Benjamin B Warfield
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 7.851

7.  Specificity of ligand binding in a buried nonpolar cavity of T4 lysozyme: linkage of dynamics and structural plasticity.

Authors:  A Morton; B W Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-07-11       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Energetic origins of specificity of ligand binding in an interior nonpolar cavity of T4 lysozyme.

Authors:  A Morton; W A Baase; B W Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-07-11       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Calculation of relative binding free energy differences for fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase inhibitors using the thermodynamic cycle perturbation approach.

Authors:  M R Reddy; M D Erion
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-07-04       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Multiple and single binding modes of fragment-like kinase inhibitors revealed by molecular modeling, residue type-selective protonation, and nuclear overhauser effects.

Authors:  Keith L Constantine; Luciano Mueller; William J Metzler; Patricia A McDonnell; Gordon Todderud; Valentina Goldfarb; Yi Fan; John A Newitt; Susan E Kiefer; Mian Gao; David Tortolani; Wayne Vaccaro; John Tokarski
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  57 in total

1.  BEDAM binding free energy predictions for the SAMPL4 octa-acid host challenge.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Haoyuan Chen; He Chen; Michael Fitzgerald; Yang Gao; Peng He; Malathi Kalyanikar; Chuan Kao; Beidi Lu; Yijie Niu; Manasi Pethe; Jie Zhu; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Lead optimization mapper: automating free energy calculations for lead optimization.

Authors:  Shuai Liu; Yujie Wu; Teng Lin; Robert Abel; Jonathan P Redmann; Christopher M Summa; Vivian R Jaber; Nathan M Lim; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Toward Fast and Accurate Binding Affinity Prediction with pmemdGTI: An Efficient Implementation of GPU-Accelerated Thermodynamic Integration.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Yuan Hu; Brad Sherborne; Zhuyan Guo; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Is ring breaking feasible in relative binding free energy calculations?

Authors:  Shuai Liu; Lingle Wang; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Separated topologies--a method for relative binding free energy calculations using orientational restraints.

Authors:  Gabriel J Rocklin; David L Mobley; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Comparing Alchemical Free Energy Estimates to Experimental Values Based on the Ben-Naim Formula: How Much Agreement Can We Expect?

Authors:  T Ryan Rogers; Feng Wang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Absolute Binding Free Energies between T4 Lysozyme and 141 Small Molecules: Calculations Based on Multiple Rigid Receptor Configurations.

Authors:  Bing Xie; Trung Hai Nguyen; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  A combined treatment of hydration and dynamical effects for the modeling of host-guest binding thermodynamics: the SAMPL5 blinded challenge.

Authors:  Rajat Kumar Pal; Kamran Haider; Divya Kaur; William Flynn; Junchao Xia; Ronald M Levy; Tetiana Taran; Lauren Wickstrom; Tom Kurtzman; Emilio Gallicchio
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Lin Frank Song; Nupur Bansal; Zheng Zheng; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Sensitivity in Binding Free Energies Due to Protein Reorganization.

Authors:  Nathan M Lim; Lingle Wang; Robert Abel; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.