Literature DB >> 26609601

Computations of Absolute Solvation Free Energies of Small Molecules Using Explicit and Implicit Solvent Model.

Devleena Shivakumar1, Yuqing Deng1, Benoît Roux1.   

Abstract

Accurate determination of absolute solvation free energy plays a critical role in numerous areas of biomolecular modeling and drug discovery. A quantitative representation of ligand and receptor desolvation, in particular, is an essential component of current docking and scoring methods. Furthermore, the partitioning of a drug between aqueous and nonpolar solvents is one of the important factors considered in pharmacokinetics. In this study, the absolute hydration free energy for a set of 239 neutral ligands spanning diverse chemical functional groups commonly found in drugs and drug-like candidates is calculated using the molecular dynamics free energy perturbation method (FEP/MD) with explicit water molecules, and compared to experimental data as well as its counterparts obtained using implicit solvent models. The hydration free energies are calculated from explicit solvent simulations using a staged FEP procedure permitting a separation of the total free energy into polar and nonpolar contributions. The nonpolar component is further decomposed into attractive (dispersive) and repulsive (cavity) components using the Weeks-Chandler-Anderson (WCA) separation scheme. To increase the computational efficiency, all of the FEP/MD simulations are generated using a mixed explicit/implicit solvent scheme with a relatively small number of explicit TIP3P water molecules, in which the influence of the remaining bulk is incorporated via the spherical solvent boundary potential (SSBP). The performances of two fixed-charge force fields designed for small organic molecules, the General Amber force field (GAFF), and the all-atom CHARMm-MSI, are compared. Because of the crucial role of electrostatics in solvation free energy, the results from various commonly used charge generation models based on the semiempirical (AM1-BCC) and QM calculations [charge fitting using ChelpG and RESP] are compared. In addition, the solvation free energies of the test set are also calculated using Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) and Generalized Born model of solvation (GB), which are two widely used continuum electrostatic implicit solvent models. The protocol for running the absolute solvation free energy calculations used throughout is automated as much as possible, with minimum user intervention, so that it can be used in large-scale analysis and force field optimization.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 26609601     DOI: 10.1021/ct800445x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  48 in total

1.  Multipole electrostatics in hydration free energy calculations.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Chuanjie Wu; Jay W Ponder; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Second-contact shell mutation diminishes streptavidin-biotin binding affinity through transmitted effects on equilibrium dynamics.

Authors:  Loren Baugh; Isolde Le Trong; David S Cerutti; Nital Mehta; Susanne Gülich; Patrick S Stayton; Ronald E Stenkamp; Terry P Lybrand
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Predicting hydration free energies of polychlorinated aromatic compounds from the SAMPL-3 data set with FiSH and LIE models.

Authors:  Traian Sulea; Enrico O Purisima
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Determination of membrane-insertion free energies by molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  James Gumbart; Benoît Roux
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Rapid prediction of solvation free energy. 3. Application to the SAMPL2 challenge.

Authors:  Enrico O Purisima; Christopher R Corbeil; Traian Sulea
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Predictions of hydration free energies from continuum solvent with solute polarizable models: the SAMPL2 blind challenge.

Authors:  Alexandre Meunier; Jean-François Truchon
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 7.  Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity by free energy simulations: assumptions, pitfalls and expectations.

Authors:  Julien Michel; Jonathan W Essex
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Calculating Partition Coefficients of Small Molecules in Octanol/Water and Cyclohexane/Water.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; Gaetano Calabró; Daisy Y Kyu; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  A Continuum Poisson-Boltzmann Model for Membrane Channel Proteins.

Authors:  Li Xiao; Jianxiong Diao; D'Artagnan Greene; Junmei Wang; Ray Luo
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 10.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.