Literature DB >> 22191386

The Peptic Ulcer Perforation (PULP) score: a predictor of mortality following peptic ulcer perforation. A cohort study.

M H Møller1, M C Engebjerg, S Adamsen, J Bendix, R W Thomsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate and early identification of high-risk surgical patients with perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is important for triage and risk stratification. The objective of the present study was to develop a new and improved clinical rule to predict mortality in patients following surgical treatment for PPU.
DESIGN: nationwide cohort study based on prospectively collected data.
SETTING: thirty-five hospitals in Denmark. PATIENTS: a total of 2668 patients surgically treated for gastric or duodenal PPU between 1 February 2003 and 31 August 2009. OUTCOME MEASURE: 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: We derived a new clinical prediction rule for 30-day mortality and evaluated and compared its prognostic performance with the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) and Boey scores. A total of 708 patients (27%) died within 30 days of surgery. The Peptic Ulcer Perforation (PULP) score - comprised eight variables with an adjusted odds ratio of more than 1.28: 1) age > 65 years, 2) active malignant disease or AIDS, 3) liver cirrhosis, 4) steroid use, 5) time from perforation to admission > 24 h, 6) pre-operative shock, 7) serum creatinine > 130 μM, and 8) the four levels of the ASA score (from 2 to 5). The score predicted mortality well (area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) 0.83). It performed considerably better than the Boey score (AUC 0.70) and better than the ASA score alone (AUC 0.78).
CONCLUSION: The PULP score accurately predicts 30-day mortality in patients operated for PPU and can assist in risk stratification and triage.
© 2011 The Authors Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica © 2011 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22191386     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02609.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  31 in total

1.  Long-Term Mortality in Patients Operated for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Factors Limiting Longevity are Dominated by Older Age, Comorbidity Burden and Severe Postoperative Complications.

Authors:  K Thorsen; J A Søreide; K Søreide
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Low serum albumin may predict the need for gastric resection in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  J G Seow; Y R Lim; V G Shelat
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Triple tube drainage for "difficult" gastroduodenal perforations: A prospective study.

Authors:  Nitin Agarwal; Nishant Kumar Malviya; Nikhil Gupta; Iqbal Singh; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-27

Review 4.  Diagnosis and treatment of perforated or bleeding peptic ulcers: 2013 WSES position paper.

Authors:  Salomone Di Saverio; Marco Bassi; Nazareno Smerieri; Michele Masetti; Francesco Ferrara; Carlo Fabbri; Luca Ansaloni; Stefania Ghersi; Matteo Serenari; Federico Coccolini; Noel Naidoo; Massimo Sartelli; Gregorio Tugnoli; Fausto Catena; Vincenzo Cennamo; Elio Jovine
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  The selective use of laparoscopic repair is safe in high-risk patients suffering from perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh; Philip Wai Yan Chiu; Amy Siu Yan Kok; Simon Kin Hung Wong; Enders Kwok Wai Ng
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Outcomes of Nonoperative Treatment for Gastroduodenal Ulcer Perforation: a Nationwide Study of 14,918 Inpatients in Japan.

Authors:  Takaaki Konishi; Michimasa Fujiogi; Nobuaki Michihata; Ryosuke Kumazawa; Hiroki Matsui; Kiyohide Fushimi; Masahiko Tanabe; Yasuyuki Seto; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Scoring Systems for Outcome Prediction of Patients with Perforation Peritonitis.

Authors:  Murugappan Nachiappan; Manjusha Madhusudhan Litake
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-03-01

8.  Epidemiology of perforated peptic ulcer: age- and gender-adjusted analysis of incidence and mortality.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Jan Terje Kvaløy; Tom Glomsaker; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Validation of prognostic scoring systems for predicting 30-day mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  Shaili Patel; Devanshu Kalra; Samir Kacheriwala; Mihir Shah; Dipesh Duttaroy
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2019-12-16

Review 10.  Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.