Literature DB >> 27134924

Scoring Systems for Outcome Prediction of Patients with Perforation Peritonitis.

Murugappan Nachiappan1, Manjusha Madhusudhan Litake2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Peritonitis continues to be one of the major infectious problems confronting a surgeon. Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI), Physiological and Operative Severity Score for en Umeration of Mortality (POSSUM) and Morbidity and sepsis score of Stoner and Elebute have been devised for risk assessment and for prediction of postoperative outcome. AIM: The aim of this study was to find the accuracy of these scores in predicting outcome in terms of mortality in patients undergoing exploratory laprotomy for perforation peritonitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective study was carried out in 100 diagnosed cases of perforation at our centre in a single unit over a period of 21 months from December 2012 to August 2014. Study was conducted on all cases of peritonitis albeit primary, tertiary, iatrogenic and those with age less than 12 years were excluded from the study. All the relevant data were collected and three scores were computed from one set of data from the patient. The main outcome measure was survival of the patient. The Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) curves were obtained for the three scores. Area Under the Curves (AUC) was calculated. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated at a cut off point obtained from the ROC curves.
RESULTS: POSSUM had an AUC of 0.99, sepsis score had an AUC of 0.98 and MPI had an AUC of 0.95. The cut off point score of 51 for POSSUM had an accuracy of 93.8 and positive predictive value of 70.5, the score of 29 for MPI had an accuracy of 82.8 and positive predictive value of 46 and the score of 22 for sepsis score had an accuracy of 95.9 and positive predictive value of 86.67.
CONCLUSION: POSSUM score was found to be superior in prediction of mortality as compared to sepsis score of Stoner and Elebute and MPI. POSSUM and MPI over predicted mortality in some cases. None of these scores are strictly preoperative.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mannheim peritonitis index; Physiological and Operative Severity Score for enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM); Sepsis score of Stoner and Elebute

Year:  2016        PMID: 27134924      PMCID: PMC4843309          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16260.7338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  16 in total

1.  Risk-adjusted surgical audit with the POSSUM scoring system in a developing country. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity.

Authors:  M K Yii; K J Ng
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Evaluation of Mannheim peritonitis index and multiple organ failure score in patients with peritonitis.

Authors:  Ali Yaghoobi Notash; Javad Salimi; Hosein Rahimian; Mojgan sadat Hashemi Fesharaki; Ali Abbasi
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct

Review 3.  A systematic review of the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity and its Portsmouth modification as predictors of post-operative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Haolu Wang; Tao Chen; Hui Wang; Yanyan Song; Xinxing Li; Jian Wang
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Mortality and perforated peptic ulcer: a case for risk stratification in elderly patients.

Authors:  T T Irvin
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Prediction of outcome using the Mannheim peritonitis index in 2003 patients. Peritonitis Study Group.

Authors:  A Billing; D Fröhlich; F W Schildberg
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  The Peptic Ulcer Perforation (PULP) score: a predictor of mortality following peptic ulcer perforation. A cohort study.

Authors:  M H Møller; M C Engebjerg; S Adamsen; J Bendix; R W Thomsen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.105

Review 7.  A systematic review of POSSUM and its related models as predictors of post-operative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Colin Hewitt Richards; Fiona E Leitch; Paul G Horgan; Donald C McMillan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Prospective evaluation of prognostic scoring systems in peritonitis. Peritonitis Study Group.

Authors:  C Ohmann; D H Wittmann; H Wacha
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1993-05

9.  Risk factors in patients surgically treated for peptic ulcer perforation.

Authors:  Morten Hylander Møller; Kamran Shah; Jørgen Bendix; Anders Gadegaard Jensen; Erik Zimmermann-Nielsen; Sven Adamsen; Ann Merete Møller
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; J E Zimmerman; D P Wagner; E A Draper; D E Lawrence
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  3 in total

1.  Pre and postoperative lactate levels and lactate clearance in predicting in-hospital mortality after surgery for gastrointestinal perforation.

Authors:  Min Kyu Kang; Seung-Young Oh; Hannah Lee; Ho Geol Ryu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Prognostic Significance of Simple Scoring Systems in the Prediction of Diffuse Peritonitis Morbidity and Mortality.

Authors:  Petr Špička; Josef Chudáček; Tomáš Řezáč; Lubomír Starý; Rostislav Horáček; Dušan Klos
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28

3.  Importance of CT-scan predicting clinical outcomes in gastro-intestinal perforation.

Authors:  Roberto Bini; Clemente Ronchetta; Silvia Picotto; Gitana Scozzari; Shailvi Gupta; Simone Frassini; Osvaldo Chiara
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.