Literature DB >> 27074924

Low serum albumin may predict the need for gastric resection in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

J G Seow1, Y R Lim2, V G Shelat3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is a common surgical emergency and treatment involves omental patch repair (PR). Gastric resection (GR) is reserved for difficult pathologies. We audit the outcomes of GR at our institution and evaluate the pre-operative factors predicting the need for GR.
METHODS: This is a single-institution, retrospective study of patients with PPU who underwent surgery from 2004 to 2012. Demographics, clinical presentation and intra-operative findings were studied to identify factors predicting the need for GR in PPU. An audit of clinical outcomes and mortality for all patients with GR is reported.
RESULTS: 537 (89.6 %) patients underwent PR and 62 (10.4 %) patients GR. Old age (p < 0.0001), female sex (p = 0.0123), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) usage (p = 0.0008), previous history of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) (p = 0.0159), low hemoglobin (p < 0.0001), low serum albumin (p < 0.0001), high serum creatinine (p = 0.0030), high urea (p = 0.0006) and large ulcer size (p < 0.0001) predict the need for GR. On multivariate analysis only low serum albumin (OR 5.57, 95 % CI 1.56-19.84, p = 0.008) predicted the need for GR. The presence of Helicobacter pylori infection was protective against GR (OR 0.25, 95 %CI 0.14-0.44, p < 0.0001). Morbidity and mortality of GR was 27.7 and 24.2 %, respectively.
CONCLUSION: GR is needed in one in ten cases of PPU. Low serum albumin predicted the need for GR on multivariate analysis. Morbidity and mortality of GR remains high.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Albumin; Gastric resection; Perforated peptic ulcer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27074924     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-016-0669-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  25 in total

1.  A simplified prognostic scoring system for peptic ulcer perforation in developing countries.

Authors:  Arpan Mishra; Dhananjaya Sharma; V K Raina
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

Review 2.  Surgery for peptic ulcer today. A study on the incidence, methods and mortality in surgery for peptic ulcer in Finland between 1987 and 1999.

Authors:  H Paimela; N K J Oksala; E Kivilaakso
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 2.588

3.  Perforated duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  J Boey; J Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Epidemiology of perforated peptic ulcer: age- and gender-adjusted analysis of incidence and mortality.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Jan Terje Kvaløy; Tom Glomsaker; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Reassessment of Graham-Steele closure in acute perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  M E Fallat; M J White; J D Richardson; L M Flint
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 0.954

6.  [The Mannheim peritonitis index. An instrument for the intraoperative prognosis of peritonitis].

Authors:  M M Linder; H Wacha; U Feldmann; G Wesch; R A Streifensand; E Gundlach
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Ludwik Rydygier--contributor to modern surgery.

Authors:  Radoslaw Pach; Anita Orzel-Nowak; Thecla Scully
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  The management of large perforations of duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  Sanjay Gupta; Robin Kaushik; Rajeev Sharma; Ashok Attri
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2005-06-25       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  A practical scoring system to predict mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Ebru Menekse; Belma Kocer; Ramazan Topcu; Aydemir Olmez; Mesut Tez; Cuneyt Kayaalp
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 10.  An overview of history, pathogenesis and treatment of perforated peptic ulcer disease with evaluation of prognostic scoring in adults.

Authors:  V Prabhu; A Shivani
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2014-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Focus on acute care surgery.

Authors:  F J Turégano
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Marginal ulcer perforation: a single center experience.

Authors:  S K Natarajan; D Chua; K Anbalakan; V G Shelat
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 3.  Perforated peptic ulcer - an update.

Authors:  Kin Tong Chung; Vishalkumar G Shelat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-27

4.  Omental patch repair of large perforated peptic ulcers ≥25 mm is associated with higher leak rate.

Authors:  Yi Liang Wang; Xue Wei Chan; Kai Siang Chan; Vishal G Shelat
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2021-11-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.